Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:21:04.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Workshop no. 5. Strategies for conserving susceptibility to insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Insecticide resistance is a serious problem in the control of many vector-borne diseases, particularly in developing countries where the possibility of changing to an alternative compound may be restricted. Consequently genes giving susceptibility to insecticides in vector species can be viewed as constituting a valuable resource to be used up with discretion. The exchange of information and thought taking place in the Workshop was centred upon possible ways to conserve this resource, i.e. to slow down the evolution of resistance while maintaining adequate control, so preserving the effective life of available insecticides as long as possible. The subject was treated mainly in relation to insect vectors of disease although niost of the discussion would also be relevant to other insect pests.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 69 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Champ, B. R. & Dyte, C. E. (1970). Report ofthe Fao Global Surveyof Pesticide Susceptibility of Slored QrainFeste. F.A.O., Rome.Google Scholar
Comins, H. N. (1977). Tho developmentof insecticide rosistance in the presence of migration. Journal of Theoretical Biology 64, 177–179.Google Scholar
Cuutis, C. F. (1978). Genetiosex Separation inAnopheles arabiensis and the produetion of sterile hybrids.Bulletin of the World Health Organization 56, 453–456.Google Scholar
Cuutis, C. F. (1980). Possible means of inhibitingthe evolution of insecticide resistance by malaria vectors. Symposium on A Hundred Years of Malaria Research, Calcutta, Jan. 1980. Cuhtis, C. F., Akiyama, J. & Davidson, G. (1976). A genetic sexing System in Anopheles gambiae species A. Mosquito News 36, 492–498.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F., Cook, L. M. & Wood, R. J. (1978). Selection for and against insecticide resistance and possible methods of inhibiting tho evolution of resistance in mosquitoes. Ecological Entomology 3, 273–287.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F. & Rawlings, P. (1980). A preliminary study of dispersal and survival of Anopheles eulieifacies inrelation to tho possibility of inhibiting the spread of insecticide resistance. Ecological Entomology 5, 11–17.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. (1958). The practical implicationof studies on insecticide resistance in Anopheline mosquitoes. Indian Journal of Malariology 12, 413–422.Google Scholar
Falconek, D.S. (1960). Introductionto Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
ÜKoughiou, G. P. & Taylor, C. E. (1977). Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insectieido resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 70, 319–323.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P., Lagunes, A. & Baker, J. D. (1980). A progress report on the impact of Joint, rotational and sequential use of insecticides on the development of resistance by mosquitoes. Proceedings ofthe California Mosquito and Vector Control Association (in Press).Google Scholar
Cjibson, J. (1980). Problems inobtaining a description of the evolution of dimethoate resistance in Danish houseflies. Soc. Chetn. Ind. Symposium-Acquisition of Resistance, London, 28. 4. 1980. Pesticide Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Hadaway, A. B. & Barlow, F. (1949). Further studies on the loss of insecticides by absorption into mud and Vegetation. Bulletin of Entomological Research 40, 323–343.Google Scholar
Hooper, G. H. S. & Brown, A. W. A. (1965). Dieldrin resistant and Ddt resistant strains of the Spotted root maggot apparently restricted to heterozygotes for resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 58, 824–830.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1965). Development of resistance in field populations of houseflies exposed to residual treatments with organophosphorus compounds. Meded. Landb. Hogesch. Gent. 30, 1362–1381.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1974a). Insecticide resistance in houseflies. Pest. Inf. Lab. Ann. Rep. (1973), 34.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (19746). 3rd Int. Congr. Pestic. Chem., Helsinki, 3-9 July 1974 (published as Keiding, 1976).Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1976). Development of resistance to pyrethroids in field populations of Danish houseflies. Pesticide Science 7, 283–291.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1977). Resistance of the housefly in Denmark and elsewhere. In Pesticide Management and Insecticide Resistance, (ed. Watson, D. L. and Brown, A. W. A.), pp. 261–302. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1978). Insecticide resistance in houseflies. Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Rep. (1977), pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
KÜNast, C. (1980). Das Resistenzproblem bei Stubenfliegen. Prakt. Schädl.bek. 32, 13–15.Google Scholar
Malcolm, C. A. & Wood, R. J. (1980). The establishment of a laboratory strain of Aedes aegypti homogeneous for high resistance to permethrin. Soc. Chem. Ind. Symposium —Acquisition of Resistance, London (1980). Pesticide Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Pinniger, D. B. (1975). The behaviour of insects in the presenco of insecticides; the effect of fenitrothion and malathion on resistant and susceptiblestrains of Tribolium castaneum Herbst., Proc. Ist Int. Wkg. Conf. Stored Prod. Ent., Savannah (1974), pp. 301–308.Google Scholar
Rawxings, P., Davidson, G., Sakai, R. K., Rathor, H. R., Aslamkhan, M. & Curtis, C. F. (1981). Field measurement of the effective donünance of an insecticide resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes. (Preprint.)Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. (1975). Effects of sequential resistance on pestieido management. Proc. Sth. Br. Insect. cfc Fung. Conf. pp. 799–811.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. & Keiding, J. (1980). Some observations on the aequisition of resistance to organophosphate insecticides in Danish houseflies. Soc. Chem. Ind. Symposium—Acquisition of Resistance, London (1980). Pesticide Science (in tho Press).Google Scholar
Seawright, J. A., Keiser, P. E., Dame, D. A. & Lofgren, C. S. (1978). Genetio method for preferential elimination of females of Anopheles albimanus. Science, Zv. 1'. 200, 1303–1304.Google Scholar
Skovmand, O. (1979). Dispersal of flies in a village. Danish Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Rep. (1978), 60–61.Google Scholar
Skovmand, O. & Keiding, J. (1980). Chemical fly control and resistance onfarms in North Germany. Danish Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Rep. (1979) (in the Press).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. E. & Georghiou, G. P. (1979). Suppression of insecticide resistanco by alteration of gene dominance and migration. Journal of Economic Entumology 72, 105—109.Google Scholar
Who (1976). Twenty-second Report of the Who Expert Committee on Insecticides. Who Technical Report Series, no. 585.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. & Cook, L. M. (1978). Estimating selection pressures on insectieido resistanco genes (preliminary note). Unpublished Who document, Who/Vbc/78. 683 pp.8.Google Scholar
Wood, R. J. & Mani, G. S. (1980). The effective dominanco of resistanco genes in relation to the evolution of resistance. Soc. Chem. Ind. Symposium-Acquisition of Resistance London (1980). Pesticide Science (in the Press).Google Scholar