Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:50:56.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of parasympathomimetic drugs to stimulate salivation in the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, and the transmission of Theileria parva using saliva obtained by this method from infected ticks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. E. Purnell
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Kabete, Kenya
D. Branagan
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Kabete, Kenya
D. E. Radley
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization, Muguga, P.O. Kabete, Kenya

Extract

Various parasympathomimetic drugs were injected per anus into female R. appendiculatus, previously fed for 5 days on rabbits, in attempts to induce the ticks to salivate. Pilocarpine nitrate and arecoline hydrobromide gave the best results and these drugs were therefore injected into ticks of various weight ranges and at various concentrations of the drug and the diluent, saline. The drugs were most effective at a concentration of 10% in 6% sodium chloride solution. If ticks salivated, the amount of saliva they produced could be positively correlated with their weight.

Sections of salivary glands from 5-day-fed female ticks in the corresponding weight ranges were examined for infection with T. parva. There appeared to be an inverse relationship between the infection rate of the ticks, and the number of infected acini observed, with increase in their weight. It was established that the greatest numbers of infective particles of T. parva should be obtained by the injection of 1 μl of 10% pilocarpine nitrate in 6% sodium chloride solution into ticks weighing between 3.1 and 13.0 mg. Twenty-five infected ticks in this weight range were injected, and the resultant saliva added to concentrated autologous leucocytes in phosphate-buffered saline before injection into a steer. The animal underwent a typical East Coast fever reaction and died, thus indicating that infective particles had been harvested by our methods.

Acknowledgements are due to many colleagues for assistance in a variety of ways. Mr M. P. Cunningham, Mr C. G. D. Brown, Dr J. K. H. Wilde, Dr R. Tatchell, Mr M. L. Burdin and Dr G. H. Freeman have given us a great deal of helpful advice. Mr C. Boarer and Mrs D. Backhurst supervised and carried out the processing and staining of the tick sections. Mr B. Wood carried out the weighing of the ticks and prepared the photographs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, K. P. (1960). Notes on the rearing of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and their infection with Theileria parva for experimental transmission. Bull. epizoot. Dis. Afr. 8, 3343.Google Scholar
Brocklesby, D. W. (1962). The febrile reaction in fatal East Coast fever: a review of 150 cases. Bull. epizoot. Dis. Afr. 10, 4954.Google Scholar
Brocklesby, D. W., Barnett, S. F. & Scott, G. R. (1961). Morbidity and mortality rates in East Coast fever (Theileria parva infection) and their application to drug screening procedures. Br. vet. J. 111, 529–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L. S. & Gilman, A. (1960). The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (2nd ed.), pp. 464–76. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Gregson, J. D. (1953). Review of recent contributions to the study of tick paralysis in North America. Proc. VI Int. Congr. Microbiol. 5, 507–11.Google Scholar
Gregson, J. D. (1957). Experiments on oral secretion of the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni Stiles (Acarina: Ixodidae). Can. Ent. 89, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, C. J. (1966). Collection of salivary gland secretion from the argasid Ornithodorus savignyi Audouin, 1827 by the use of a pharmacological stimulant. J. S. Afr. vet. med. Ass. 37, 236–9.Google Scholar
Joyner, L. P. & Purnell, R. E. (1968). The feeding behaviour on rabbits and in vitro of the Ixodid tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, 1901. Parasitology 58, 715–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, R. (1928). Fonctionnement du vaisseu dorsal de la larve de mouche en milieu artificiel. C. r. Seanc. Soc. Biol. 99, 1482–5.Google Scholar
Martin, H. M., Barnett, S. F. & Vidler, B. O. (1964). Cyclic development and longevity in the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Expl. Parasit. 15, 527–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purnell, R. E. & Joyner, L. P. (1967). Artificial feeding technique for Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and the transmission of Theileria parva from the salivary secretion. Nature, Lond. 216, 484–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, R. E. & Joyner, L. P. (1968). The development of Theileria parva in the salivary glands of the tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Parasitology 58, 725–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. (1967). A modified method for obtaining tick oral secretion. J. Parasit. 53, 1106–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. (1969). Studies on the Na+ and Ci balance of the feeding cattle tick Boophilus microplus together with some notes on other constituents of the haemolymph and saliva. In the Press.Google Scholar