Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:42:50.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrastructural studies on microfilariae (Nematoda: Filarioidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Diane J. McLaren
Diane J. McLaren
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, London, NW7 1AA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ultrastructural morphology of selected microfilariae from four genera is described and compared. 1. The sheath is composed of a thick layer of material not limited by membranes. 2. The cuticle is composed of a trilaminate membrane, a dense cortical layer and an inner fibrous layer. The outer leaflet of the trilaminate membrane is covered with a dense surface layer. 3. The hypodermis is formed of four components, and the outer membrane of each component is castellated. 4. Muscle cells are located in the four quadrants of the worm; each cell is divided into a contractile and a non-contractile region. Anterior muscle cells are probably involved in the movement of the hook. 5. A buccal capsule is situated at the anterior tip of the microfilaria; it is connected to the pharyngeal thead. The thread is already surrounded by the future oesophageal cells. It is not yet known whether these structures are functional in the microfilaria. 6. Three kinds of sensory organelle have been identified; they all contain modified cilia. The hook is associated with one of the amphids. 7. The excretory vesicle opens through a pore in the cuticle and is surrounded at its base by an elongate cell. The apparatus may possibly have an excretory, secretory or osmoregulatory function. 8. The inner body is composed of dense, granular material; it is already surrounded by the future intestinal cells. The inner body is thought to represent some kind of reserve material. 9. Apart from its size the G1 cell shows no unusual characteristics. 10. The anal vesicle opens through a pore in the cuticle and is surrounded at its base by the three R cells. The anal apparatus may be instrumental in the removal of waste materials, or it may be involved in some secretory activity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 317 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D. R., (1965). A method of preparing peripheral leukocytes for electron microscopy. Journal of infrastructure Research 13, 263–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Bain, O., (1970). La cellule R1 des microfilaires (Nematoda) initiate du mésenchyme. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 45, 227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R. G., (1970). Trichinella spiralis: fine structure of body wall with special reference to formation and moulting of cuticle. Experimental Parasitology 28, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chitwood, B. G., & Chitwood, M. B., (1940). In An Introduction to Nematology, Section II, p. 180. Baltimore: Monumental Printing Co.Google Scholar
Collin, W. K., (1971). Ultrastructural morphology of the oesophageal region of the infective larva of Brugia pahangi (Nematoda: Filarioidea). The Journal of Parasitology 57, 449–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fülleborn, F., (1913). Beiträge zur morphologie und differentialdiagnose der Mikrofilarien. Beihefte zum Archiv für Schiffs-und Tropenhygiene 17, (1), 7–72.Google Scholar
Gibbons, I. R., & Grimstone, A. V., (1960). On flagellar structure in certain flagellates. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 7, 697–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawking, F., (1967). The 24-hour periodicity of microfilariae: biological mechanisms responsible for its production and control. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B) 169, 59–76.Google Scholar
De Harven, E., (1967). Methods in Electron Microscopic Cytology. In Methods in Cancer Research (ed. Busch, H.), 1, pp. 3–44. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. H., & Bemrick, W. J., (1969). Diroftlaria immitis microfilariae: Electron microscopic examination of cuticle and muscle cells. American Journal of Veterinary Research 30, 1443–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Kozek, W. J., (1968). Unusual cilia in the microfllaria of Diroftlaria immitis. The Journal of Parasitology 54, 838–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, B. R., & Simpson, M. G., (1968). Cephalic and pharyngeal structures in microfilariae revealed by staining. Journal of Helminthology 42, 309–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, B. R., & Simpson, M. G., (1969). Staining microfilariae for structures other than nuclei. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 63, 801–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurence, B. R., & Simpson, M. G., (1971). The microfilaria of Brugia: a first stage nematode larva. Journal of Helminthology 45, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P. R., & Shute, C. C. D., (1966). The distribution of cholinesterase in cholinergic neurones demonstrated with the electron microscope. Journal of Cell Science 1, 381–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., (1969). Ciliary structures in the microfilaria of Loa loa. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 63, 290–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., (1970). Preliminary observations on the sensory structures in adult Filariae. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 64, 191–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., (1971). Ultrastructural studies on filarial worms. Ph.D. thesis, Brunei University.Google Scholar
Millonig, G., (1961). Advantages of a phosphate buffer for osmium tetroxide solutions in fixation. Journal of Applied Physiology 32, 1637.Google Scholar
Penel, R., (1904). Les filaires du sang de l'homme. Thesis, Paris.Google Scholar
Rodenwaldt, E., (1908). Die verteilung der Mikrofilarien im Körper und die Ursachen des turnus bei Mf. nocturna und diurna. Studien zur morphologie der Mikrofilarien. Beihefte zum Archiv für Schiffs- und Tropenhygiene 12, (10), 393–418.Google Scholar
Schardein, J. L., Lucas, J. A., & Dickerson, C. W., (1968). Ultrastructural changes in Litomosoides carinii microfilariae in gerbils treated with diethylcarbamazine. The Journal of Parasitology 54, 351–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheffield, H. G., (1963). Electron microscopy of the bacillary band and stichosome of Trichuris muris and T. vulpis. The Journal of Parasitology 49, 993–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. E. R., (1960). Studies on the microfilariae of Loa loa, Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, Diroftlaria immitis, D. repens and D. aethiops. Journal of Helminthology 34, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venable, J. H., & Coggleshall, R., (1965). A simplified lead citrate stain for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 25, 407–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, P., (1960). Studies on Ethiopian Chrysops as possible vectors of Loiasis. I. Chrysops silacea Austen and Human Loiasis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 54, 439–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, K. A., (1968). Structure of the bacillary band of Trichuris myocastoris. The Journal of Parasitology 54, 1106–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar