Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:04:33.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trypanosoma rangeli infection increases the exposure and predation endured by Rhodnius prolixus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2021

Newmar Pinto Marliére
Affiliation:
Vector Behavior and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo
Affiliation:
Vector Behavior and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Alessandra Aparecida Guarneri*
Affiliation:
Vector Behavior and Pathogen Interaction Group, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Alessandra Aparecida Guarneri, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Trypanosoma rangeli is a protozoan that infects triatomines and mammals in Latin America, sharing hosts with Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas disease. Trypanosoma rangeli does not cause disease to humans but is strongly pathogenic to its invertebrate hosts, increasing mortality rates and affecting bug development and reproductive success. We have previously shown that this parasite is also capable of inducing a general increase in the locomotory activity of its vector Rhodnius prolixus in the absence of host cues. In this work, we have evaluated whether infection impacts the insect–vertebrate host interaction. For this, T. rangeli-infected and uninfected R. prolixus nymphs were released in glass arenas offering single shelters. After a 3-day acclimatization, a caged mouse was introduced in each arena and shelter use and predation rates were evaluated. Trypanosoma rangeli infection affected all parameters analysed. A larger number of infected bugs was found outside shelters, both in the absence and presence of a host. Infected bugs also endured greater predation rates, probably because of an increased number of individuals that attempted to feed. Interestingly, mice that predated on infected bugs did not develop T. rangeli infection, suggesting that the oral route is not effective for these parasites, at least in our system. Finally, a smaller number of infected bugs succeeded in feeding in this context. We suggest that, although T. rangeli is not transmitted orally, an increase in the proportion of foraging individuals would promote greater parasite transmission rates through an increased frequency of very effective infected-bug bites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Añez, N and East, JS (1984) Studies on Trypanosoma rangeli Tejera, 1920. II. Its effect on feeding behaviour of triatomine bugs. Acta Tropica 41, 9395.Google ScholarPubMed
Coura, JR (2015) The main sceneries of Chagas disease transmission. The vectors, blood and oral transmissions – a comprehensive review. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 110, 277282.10.1590/0074-0276140362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Alessandro-Bacigalupo, A and Gore-Saravia, N (1999) Trypanosoma rangeli. In Gilles, HM (ed.), Protozoal Diseases. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 398412.Google Scholar
Dario, MA, Pavan, MG, Rodrigues, MS, Lisboa, CV, Kluyber, D, Desbiez, AL, Herrera, HM, Roque, ALR, Lima, L, Teixeira, MMG and Jansen, AM (2021) Trypanosoma rangeli genetic, mammalian hosts, and geographical diversity from five Brazilian biomes. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 10, 736.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Lorenzo, MG, Elliot, SL and Guarneri, AA (2010) A standardizable protocol for infection of Rhodnius prolixus with Trypanosoma rangeli, which mimics natural infections and reveals physiological effects of infection upon the insect. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 105, 9197.10.1016/j.jip.2010.05.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Pereira, MH and Guarneri, AA (2015) Revisiting Trypanosoma rangeli transmission involving susceptible and non-susceptible hosts. PLoS ONE 10, e0140575.10.1371/journal.pone.0140575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, RC, Teixeira, CF, de Sousa, VF and Guarneri, AA (2018) Effect of temperature and vector nutrition on the development and multiplication of Trypanosoma rangeli in Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology Research 117, 17371744.10.1007/s00436-018-5854-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, RA, Guarneri, AA and Lorenzo, MG (2019) Activity and shelter-related behavior in Rhodnius prolixus: the role of host odours. Acta Tropica 196, 150154.10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.05.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, LL, Araújo, FFD, Martinelli, PM, Teixeira-Carvalho, A, Alves-Silva, J and Guarneri, AA (2020) New features on the survival of human-infective Trypanosoma rangeli in a murine model: parasite accumulation is observed in lymphoid organs. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0009015.10.1371/journal.pntd.0009015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, ES, Mello, CB, Azambuja, P and Ribeiro, JMC (1994) Rhodnius prolixus: salivary antihemostatic components decrease with Trypanosoma rangeli infection. Experimental Parasitology 78, 287293.10.1006/expr.1994.1030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisard, EC, Steindel, M, Guarneri, AA, Eger-Mangrich, I, Campbell, DA and Romanha, AJ (1999) Characterization of Trypanosoma rangeli strains isolated in Central and South America: an overview. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 94, 203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarneri, AA and Lorenzo, MG (2017) Triatomine physiology in the context of trypanosome infection. Journal of Insect Physiology 97, 6676.10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.07.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarneri, AA and Schaub, GA (2021) Interaction of triatomines with their bacterial microbiota and trypanosomes. In Guarneri, A and Lorenzo, M (eds), Triatominae – The Biology of Chagas Disease Vectors. Cham, CH: Springer Nature, pp. 345386.10.1007/978-3-030-64548-9_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, H (2003) Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 141161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, AM, das Chagas Xavier, SC and Roque, AL (2018) Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in the wild and its most important reservoir hosts in Brazil. Parasites & Vectors 11, 125.10.1186/s13071-018-3067-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazzari, CR (1992) Circadian organization of locomotion activity in the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans. Journal of Insect Physiology 38, 895903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, MG and Lazzari, CR (1998) Activity pattern in relation to refuge exploitation and feeding in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Tropica 70, 163170. doi:10.1016/S0001-706X(98)00025-4. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marliére, NP, Latorre-Estivalis, JM, Lorenzo, MG, Carrasco, D, Alves-Silva, J, Rodrigues, JO, Ferreira, LL, Lara, LM, Lowenberger, C and Guarneri, AA (2015) Trypanosomes modify the behavior of their insect hosts: effects on locomotion and on the expression of a related gene. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marliére, NP, Lorenzo, MG, Villegas, LEM and Guarneri, AA (2020) Co-existing locomotory activity and gene expression profiles in a kissing-bug vector of Chagas disease. Journal of Insect Physiology 122, 104021.10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marliére, NP, Lorenzo, MG and Guarneri, AA (2021) Trypanosoma cruzi-infected Rhodnius prolixus endure increased predation facilitating parasite transmission to mammal hosts. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, e0009570.10.1371/journal.pntd.0009570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosquera, KD and Lorenzo, MG (2020) Triatomines of the genus Rhodnius do not mark shelters with feces. Journal of Chemical Ecology 46, 865870.10.1007/s10886-020-01199-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paim, RM, Pereira, MH, Araújo, RN, Gontijo, NF and Guarneri, AA (2013) The interaction between Trypanosoma rangeli and the nitrophorins in the salivary glands of the triatomine Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera; Reduviidae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 43, 229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisenman, CE and Lazzari, C (2006) Spectral sensitivity of the photonegative reaction of the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera: Reduviidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 192, 3944.10.1007/s00359-005-0045-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisenman, CE, Lazzari, CR and Giurfa, M (1998) Circadian control of photonegative sensitivity in the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 183, 533541.10.1007/s003590050279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reithinger, R, Ceballos, L, Stariolo, R, Davies, CR and Gürtler, RE (2005) Chagas disease control: deltamethrin-treated collars reduce Triatoma infestans feeding success on dogs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 99, 502508.10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.11.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, JD, Lorenzo, MG, Martins-Filho, OA, Elliot, SL and Guarneri, AA (2016) Temperature and parasite life-history are important modulators of the outcome of Trypanosoma rangeli–Rhodnius prolixus interactions. Parasitology 143, 14591468. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016001062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottelius, J (1987) Neuraminidase fluorescence test for the differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma rangeli. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 38, 323327.Google ScholarPubMed
Shikanai-Yasuda, MA and Carvalho, NB (2012) Oral transmission of Chagas disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases 54, 845852.10.1093/cid/cir956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallon, AK, Lorenzo, MG, Moreira, LA, Martinez Villegas, LE, Hill, SR and Ignell, R (2020) Dengue infection modulates locomotion and host seeking in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0008531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, F, Poulin, R and Brodeur, J (2010) Host manipulation by parasites: a multidimensional phenomenon. Oikos 119, 12171223.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18077.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marliére et al. supplementary material

Marliére et al. supplementary material 1

Download Marliére et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 11.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Marliére et al. supplementary material

Marliére et al. supplementary material 2

Download Marliére et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.8 KB