Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:58:06.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic studies on Archigetes Leuckart, 1878 (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. R. Keneedy
C. R. Keneedy
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent experimental work has indicated that species of Archigetes are capable of infecting and maturing in fishes in addition to tubificids.

The genus Archigetes is re-defined on the basis of morphological and biological characters, with particular emphasis on recent life history studies. All species capable of neotenic development have been re-united in a single genus.

A description of all species of Archigetes together with a key for their identification are included. New synonomies are discussed.

The relationship of Archigetes to other genera of the family is briefly considered, and it is concluded that it forms the terminal stage in a series showing the attainment of neotenic development.

I wish to thank Professor R. J. Pumphrey in whose Department the work was carried out, and Dr J. C. Chubb for advice and help in the preparation of this manuscript. I am also grateful to Professor K. Berg and Dr R. L. Calentine for the loan of specimens. The work was carried out during the tenure of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 1965 , pp. 439 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, K. (1948). Biological studies on the River Susaa. Folia limnol. Scand. 4, 40–54.Google Scholar
Brinkhurst, R. O., Chubb, J. C. & Kennedy, C. R. (1962). Occurrence of the genus Archigetes in Britain. Nature, Lond., 196, 494–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calentine, R. L. (1962). Archigetes iowensis sp.n. (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae) from Cyprinus carpio L. and Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri Clap. J. Parasit. 48, 513–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calentine, R. L. (1964). The life cycle of Archigetes iowensis (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae). J. Parasit. 50, 454–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calentine, R. L. (1965). The biology and taxonomy of Biacetabulum (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae). J. Parasit. 51, 243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischthal, J. H. (1950). A new genus and species of Caryophyllaeidae (Cestoda) from fishes. J. Parasit. 36, [Abstract] 6 (2), p. 28.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1927). Notes on the Caryophyllaeidae of North America. J. Parasit. 14, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janiszewska, J. (1950). Biacetabulum sieboldi, est-elle la forme adult d'Archigetes sieboldi Leuck.? Zool. Polon. 5, 57–65.Google Scholar
Janiszewska, J. (1954). Caryophyllaeidae Europejskie ze Szczególnym Uwzgledieniem Polski. Trav. Soc. Sci. Wroclaw B, 66, 1–74.Google Scholar
Janiszewska, J. (1964). Archigetes brachyurus Mr´zek—Paraglaridacris silesiacus Janiszewska. Considerations concerning the genus Archigetes Leuckart, proposal to introduce lower systematic entities (subgenera and subspecies) in Caryophyllaeidae. Wiadom Paraz. 10, 543–4.Google Scholar
Joyeux, C. & Baer, J. G. (1961). Cestoidea. In Traité de Zoologie, 4, 347–560. Ed. P.-P., Grassé. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1965). The life history of Archigetes limnodrili (Yamaguti) (Cestoda: Caryophyllaeidae) and its development in the invertebrate host. Parasitology, 55, 427–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulakowskaya, O. P. (1961). Data on the fauna Caryophyllaeidae (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) in U.S.S.R. (Transl. title). Parazit. Sb. 20, 339–55.Google Scholar
Kulakowskaya, O. P. (1962 a). Progenetic cestodes in the body cavity of Oligochaeta. (Transl. title). Dopov. Akad. Nauk Ukr. RSR. 6, 825–9.Google Scholar
Kulakowskaya, O. P. (1962 b). Development of Caryophyllaeidae (Cestoda) in an intermediate host. (Transl. title). Zool. Zh. 41, 986–92.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1878). Archigetes sieboldi, eine geschlechtsreife Cestodenamme. Z. Wiss. Zool. 30 (suppl.) 593–606.Google Scholar
Mrázek, A. (1898). Archigetes appendiculatus Rátz. Sber. K-böhm. Ges. Wiss. Math.-nat. Kl. Prag. 32, 1–47.Google Scholar
Mrázek, A. (1908). Ueber eine neue Art der Gattung Archigetes. Zentbl. Bakt. 46, 719–23.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1962). Zur Archigetes-Frage. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala. 35, 293–306.Google Scholar
Szidat, L. (1937). Archigetes R. Leuckart, 1878, die progenetische Larve eine für Europa neuen Caryophyllaeiden-Gattung, Biacetabulum Hunter, 1927. Zool. Anz. 119, 166–72.Google Scholar
Szidat, L. (1938). Brachyurus gobii n. gen. n.sp. eine neue Caryophyllaeiden-Art aus dem Gründling, Gobio fluviatilis Cuv. Zool. Anz. 124, 249–58.Google Scholar
Van Cleave, H. J. (1953). Acanthocephala of North American mammals. Illinois biol. Monogr. 23, 1–179.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms, 780 pp. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, L. W. (1928). Archigetes cryptobothrius n.sp. nebst. Angaben die Entwicklung im Genus Archigetes, R. Leuck. Zool. Anz. 77, 113–24.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, L. W. (1930). Das Genus Archigetes R. Leuck. Eine Studie zur Anatomie, Histogenese, Systematik und Biologie. Mem. Acad. pol. sci. ser. B, 2, 1–160.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1934). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Pt. 4, Cestodes of fishes. Jap. J. Zool. 6, 1–112.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1959). Systema Helminthum 2. The Cestodes of Vertebrates, 860 pp. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar