Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:45:45.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival of Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Monogenea) under controlled environmental conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Tocque  and
R. C. Tinsley
K. Tocque
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road, London El 4NS
R. C. Tinsley
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road, London El 4NS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Populations of Pseudodiplorchis americanus infecting the desert toad, Scaphiopus couchii, have previously been shown to be remarkably stable from year to year, despite wide variation in conditions promoting invasion. The present study aimed to document the survival of both first-year and pre-existing adults under controlled laboratory temperatures. First-year worm survival in experimentally infected toads was shown to be very high for the first 5 months after migration to the definitive site, and there was no difference in survival at 25 °C or 15–20 °C. There was also no density-dependent survival during the same period: 20% of worms were recovered from the host urinary bladder, irrespective of initial intensities. After the first 5 months, there was a progressive loss of worms in toads maintained at 25 °C but not at 15–20 °C. Pre-existing adult populations were shown to be virtually identical to those under natural conditions for the first 4 months after toad capture. Following this, at 25 °C, populations declined and no pre-existing adults were recovered after 11–14 months. There was no such loss of pre-existing adults at 15–20 °C for up to 14 months. A diurnal temperature cycle of 20–34 °C (simulating temperatures during the desert summer) did not lead to a significant loss of worms. These observations suggest that during one annual cycle in the desert, when temperatures remain above 20 °C for less than 6 months, most adult worms established in the host urinary bladder will survive to the next transmission opportunity. However, the similar longevity of first-year and pre-existing adults in laboratory maintained toads shows that loss of worms cannot be due solely to parasite ageing. Temperature-dependent survival of P. americanus is suggestive of a host immune response. Low temperatures, which inhibit parasite growth and development, are essential for the survival of P. americanus.

Keywords

MonogeneaPseudodiplorchis americanusparasite population dynamicsScaphiopus couchiitemperature-dependent survival
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , February 1994 , pp. 185 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. & Gordon, D. M. (1982). Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers with special emphasis on host mortalities. Parasitology 85, 373–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1978). Regulation and stability of hostparasite population interactions. I. Regulatory processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, J. & Tinsley, R. C. (1992 a). Unique ultrastructural adaptations of Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Polystomatidae: Monogenea) to a sequence of hostile conditions following host invasion. Parasitology 105, 229–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable, J. & Tinsley, R. C. (1992 b). Microsporidean hyperparasites and bacteria associated with Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Monogenea: Polystomatidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 228, 41–50.Google Scholar
Combes, C. (1968). Biologie écologie des cycles et biogéographie de digènes et monogènes d'amphibiens dans l'est des Pyrénées. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris), série A Zoologie 51, 1–195.Google Scholar
Combes, C. (1972). Écologie des Polystomatidae (Monogenea): Facteurs influençant le volume et le rhythme de la ponte. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1971 a). A quantitative approach to parasitism. Parasitology 62, 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, H. D. (1971 b). A model for host–parasite relationships. Parasitology 63, 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. C. & Tinsley, R. C. (1988). Environmental influences on egg production by the monogenean Protopolystoma xenopodis. Parasitology 97, 115–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G. W., Holmes, J. C., Kuris, A. M. & Schad, G. A. (1982). The use of ecological terms in parasitology. (Report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists). Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, L. Jr. (1967). Adaptations of the spadefoot toad Scaphiopus couchi to desert environments. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 20, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. (1983). Ovoviviparity in platyhelminth life-cycles. Parasitology 86, 161–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinsley, R. C. (1984). Pulsed parasite transmission between desert-adapted amphibians. Parasitology 89, vi.Google Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. (1989). The effects of host sex on transmission success. Parasitology Today 5, 192–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinsley, R. C. (1990). The influence of parasite infection on mating success in spadefoot toads, Scaphiopus couchii. American Zoologist 30, 313–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. (1993). The population biology of polystomatid monogeneans. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 328, 120–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. & Jackson, H. C. (1986). Intestinal migration in the life-cycle of Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Monogenea). Parasitology 93, 451–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. & Jackson, H. C. (1988). Pulsed transmission of Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Monogenea) between desert hosts (Scaphiopus couchii). Parasitology 97, 437–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocque, K. (1990). The reproductive strategy of a monogenean parasite in a desert environment. Ph.D. thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Tocque, K. (1993). The relationship between parasite burden and host resources in the desert toad (Scaphiopus couchii), under natural environmental conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 683–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocque, K. & Tinsley, R. C. (1991 a). Asymmetric reproductive output by the monogenean Pseudodiplorchis americanus. Parasitology 102, 213–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tocque, K. & Tinsley, R. C. (1991 b). Influence of desert temperature cycles on the reproductive biology of the monogenean Pseudodiplorchis americanus. Parasitology 103, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocque, K. & Tinsley, R. C. (1994). The relationship between Pseudodiplorchis americanus (Monogenea) density and host resources under controlled environmental conditions. Parasitology 108, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed