Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:24:04.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successful control of Echinococcosis in Argentina and Chile through a One Health approach, including vaccination of the sheep intermediate host

Part of: XXIX World Congress on Echinococcosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2024

Thelma Veronica Poggio Open the ORCID record for Thelma Veronica Poggio [Opens in a new window] ,
Tomas Chacon  and
Edmundo Larrieu Open the ORCID record for Edmundo Larrieu [Opens in a new window]
Thelma Veronica Poggio*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología “César Milstein”- Fundación Cassara – CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Tomas Chacon
Affiliation:
Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Dirección Regional Aysén, Aysen, Chile
Edmundo Larrieu
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, General Pico, Argentina Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro, Escuela de Veterinaria, Choele Choel, Argentina
*
Corresponding author: Thelma Veronica Poggio; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis control in South American countries requires a comprehensive integrative ‘One Health’ approach. While insular nations have seen successful in their elimination programmes, South American countries face persistent challenges in hostile environments, with Echinococcus granulosus s.l., posing a significant public health concern. Vaccination of intermediate hosts has demonstrated the efficacy of the EG95 vaccine in reducing transmission rates. For example, since 2009, Rio Negro Province in Argentina has added, with marked success, the EG95 vaccine to the control programme, supplementing dog deworming. The Aysen Region of Chile has also reported encouraging preliminary results in reducing cyst prevalence in vaccinated sheep after 3 years of vaccination. The challenges in aligning control strategies with socio-cultural factors, especially in indigenous communities, underlines the need for context-specific strategies. The Rio Negro programme demonstrated commendable compliance, underlining the importance of community engagement in achieving lasting success. The most promising strategies for effective echinococcosis control involved dog deworming and the routine vaccination of sheep and/or goats, underscoring the importance of sustained implementation until all grazing animals have been replaced. For lasting success, these interventions need to be combined with a robust surveillance system.

Keywords

Cystic echinococcosiscontrolSouth Americavaccine
Type
Review Article
Information
Parasitology , First View , pp. 1 - 5
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The control of cystic echinococcosis (CE) involves the participation of Animal Health, Public Health, Social Sciences and Research & Technology Organizations and remains one of the best comprehensive strategies of ‘One Health’ approach.

Elimination of echinococcosis have been successful only in insular countries, for example in Tasmania and New Zealand (Craig and Larrieu, Reference Craig and Larrieu2006; Larrieu and Zanini, Reference Larrieu and Zanini2012). In South American countries such as Peru, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay and Argentina, Echinococcus granulosus s.l poses a significant public health concern (Pavletic et al., Reference Pavletic, Larrieu, Guarnera, Casas, Irabedra, Ferreira, Sayes, Gavidia, Caldas, Lise, Maxwell, Arezo, Navarro, Vigilato, Cosivi, Espinal and Vilas2017). Several control programmes have been developed in these countries, with varying levels of success and, in some cases, facing challenges for their continuity (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Gavidia and Lightowlers2019a). Therefore, there is an imperative need to validate new models and strategies supporting the ‘One Health’ approach that might be effectively replicated in different South American countries.

The vaccination of intermediate hosts reduces the transmission rate of E. granulosus s.l., consequently leading to a reduction in human infections even when control programmes face many practical difficulties (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Herrero, Mujica, Labanchi, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Ruesta, Perez, Gatti, Santillán, Cabrera, Arezzo, Seleiman, Cavagión, Cachau, Alvarez Rojas, Gino, Gauci, Heath, Lamberti and Lightowlers2013; Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Saravia, Nuñez, Boado, Gómez and Heath2022b).

The recombinant EG95 vaccine has been shown to induce specific antibodies against oncosphere proteins and demonstrated its efficacy in protecting intermediate hosts during trials conducted in New Zealand, Australia, China and Argentina (Lightowlers et al., Reference Lightowlers, Jensen, Fernandez, Iriarte, Woollard, Gauci, Jenkins and Heath1999; Heath et al., Reference Heath, Jensen and Lightowlers2003; Heath and Koolaard, Reference Heath and Koolaard2012; Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Mossello, Iriarte, Avila, Gertiser, Serafino, Romero, Echenique, Dominguez, Barrios and Heath2016).

In 2011, Providean Hidatec EG95® became the first approved recombinant vaccine for use in sheep, goats, cattle, and South American camelids (Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Mossello, Iriarte, Avila, Gertiser, Serafino, Romero, Echenique, Dominguez, Barrios and Heath2016; Jensen, Reference Jensen, Elissondo, Dopchiz and Denegri2019). Subsequently, all vaccination programmes in Latin America have incorporated this formulation providing valuable insights into the overall control strategy against the disease in different epidemiological environments.

The EG95 recombinant vaccine trials have used a standardized protocol administering 2 injections, spaced 1 month apart, and annual booster in sheep, goats, and llamas at an early age (Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Mossello, Iriarte, Avila, Gertiser, Serafino, Romero, Echenique, Dominguez, Barrios and Heath2016). However, some programmes have included adult animals, such as breeding females, in their vaccination strategy (Jensen, Reference Jensen and Jensen2021).

As the vaccine is equivalent in composition and presentation to the original New Zealand/Australian formula (Lightowlers et al., Reference Lightowlers, Lawrence, Gauci, Young, Ralston, Maas and Heath1996) it has been considered suitable and has been used in control programmes: in Argentina, Chubut Province, 2007–2013 (Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Saravia, Nuñez, Boado, Gómez and Heath2022b) and Río Negro Province, from 2009 – to date (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Herrero, Mujica, Labanchi, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Ruesta, Perez, Gatti, Santillán, Cabrera, Arezzo, Seleiman, Cavagión, Cachau, Alvarez Rojas, Gino, Gauci, Heath, Lamberti and Lightowlers2013, Reference Larrieu, Mujica, Gauci, Vizcaychipi, Seleiman, Herrero, Labanchi, Araya, Sepúlveda, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Poggio, Crowley, Cespedes, Santillán, García Cachau, Lamberti, Gino, Donadeu and Lightowlers2015, Reference Larrieu, Poggio, Mujica, Gauci, Labanchi, Herrero, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Crowley, Santillán, Vizcaychipi, Seleiman, Sepulveda, Arezo, Cachau, Lamberti, Molina, Gino, Donadeu and Lightowlers2017, Reference Larrieu, Mujica, Araya, Labanchi, Arezo, Herrero, Santillán, Vizcaychipi, Uchiumi, Salvitti, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Sepulveda, Galvan, Cabrera, Seleiman, Crowley, Cespedes, García Cachau, Gino, Molina, Daffner, Gauci, Donadeu and Lightowlers2019b; Labanchi et al., Reference Labanchi, Poggio, Gutiérrez, Mujica, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Crowley, Arezo, Seleiman, Herrero, Sepulveda, Talmon, Diaz and Larrieu2022); in Chile, Alto Biobio, 2016–2020 (Gädicke et al., Reference Gädicke, Heath, Medina-Brunet, Siva-de la Fuente, Espinoza-Rojas, Villaguala-Pacheco, Rubilar, Cerda, Quezada, Rojas, Henríquez, Loyola and Landaeta-Aqueveque2022) and Aysen, from 2020 – to date (Ministerio de Agricultura Chile, 2023) and in Peru 2015–2019 (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Gavidia and Lightowlers2019a; MINSA–SENASA, 2021).

EG95 vaccine as a new control tool in the South American context

The geographic zone where the programmes are active includes the Patagonian region, shared by Argentina and Chile. The 2 currently ongoing programmes that include vaccination of sheep are located in the Rio Negro Province (Argentina) and in the Aysen Region (Chile).

The Rio Negro Province is home to Mapuche native communities living in communal lands overseen by a religious-political leader known as the ‘Lonco’. The area lacks road infrastructure, animal-handling facilities are basic, and communication technologies are limited to radio as Wi-Fi is unavailable. People often rely on natural water sources for drinking and frequently interact closely with dogs, sometimes sharing sleeping spaces with them. The veterinary and technical teams involved in the control programme have demonstrated impressive non-verbal communication skills and understanding of the culture, customs, and rituals of the local communities, fostering trust. Additionally, in Argentina, a native health worker has served as a crucial intermediary, facilitating communication with residents.

In Chile, the Aysen vaccination area is located in one of the most endemic regions, with very limited knowledge on the transmission of the disease, but the highest rates of hospital admissions and highest incidence rates in children under 15 years of age (Vivanco Concha et al., Reference Vivanco Concha, Wanga, Sanhueza Aguilera, Zagmutt Méndeza and Vrsalovic Santibáñez2021). This is particularly worrying, considering the significant (and common) underreporting of CE cases and the elevated death rates in certain parts of the region (Colombe et al., Reference Colombe, Togami, Gelaw, Antillon, Fuentes and Weinberger2017; Medina et al., Reference Medina, Martínez, Ayala and Canals2021). In this region, the rural population are mostly settlers of mixed origin and land ownership is individual rather than communal.

Rio Negro province- Argentina vaccination control programme

Since 1980 the Rio Negro control programme for echinococcosis has been based on dog treatment (deworming) with praziquantel (PZQ), carrying out 4 rounds of home visits annually.

Surveillance included serological studies and abdominal ultrasound surveys for children. The programme has been successful in reducing the incidence of echinococcosis in humans and in dogs but not sufficiently to prevent continued transmission of the parasite and the continued incidence of human disease (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Del Carpio, Mercapide, Salvitti, Sustercic, Moguilensky, Panomarenko, Uchiumi, Herrero, Talmon, Volpe, Araya, Mujica, Mancini, Labanchi and Odriozola2011, Reference Larrieu, Uchiumi, Salvitti, Sobrino, Panomarenko, Tissot, Mercapide, Sustercic, Arezo, Mujica, Herrero, Labanchi, Grizmado, Araya, Talmon, Galvan, Sepulveda, Seleiman, Cornejo, Echenique and Del Carpio2019c; Larrieu and Zanini, Reference Larrieu and Zanini2012). For this reason, since 2009 Rio Negro province has implemented the vaccine as an additional control measure in endemic rural areas covering approximately 1054 km2. The vaccination programme involved 79 farms with vaccinated sheep (10 to 100 sheep per farm), 71 farms as a non-vaccinated control group, and 311 dogs, considering transboundary movement of sheep and dogs. Goats were excluded from the vaccination schedule.

In 2009 and subsequent years, thirty-day old lambs received 2 initial immunizations 1 month apart before weaning and a final booster immunization at approximately 1–1.5 years of age. PZQ treatment to dogs 4 times per year covered both the vaccinated and control areas, and 2 extra deworming rounds were introduced in 2018 (Labanchi et al., Reference Labanchi, Poggio, Gutiérrez, Mujica, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Crowley, Arezo, Seleiman, Herrero, Sepulveda, Talmon, Diaz and Larrieu2022). It should be noted that the Rio Negro programme faced 2 major challenges: (a) Dogs remain infected despite PZQ treatment every 3 months and (b) dogs roam between the vaccinated and control area (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Herrero, Mujica, Labanchi, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Ruesta, Perez, Gatti, Santillán, Cabrera, Arezzo, Seleiman, Cavagión, Cachau, Alvarez Rojas, Gino, Gauci, Heath, Lamberti and Lightowlers2013).

The programme included the EG95 vaccine provided by Melbourne University until 2017, and from 2018 to date, Tecnovax's vaccine is being used. The programme-maintained vaccination coverage was close to 80% for the initial, second, and third vaccination rounds every year from 2009 to 2022 (Labanchi et al., Reference Labanchi, Poggio, Gutiérrez, Mujica, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Crowley, Arezo, Seleiman, Herrero, Sepulveda, Talmon, Diaz and Larrieu2022).

Following 12 years of using the EG95 vaccine, results showcase the substantial impact of the vaccination programme in reducing the prevalence of the disease, and a sustained increase in EG95 antibody levels in the sheep population (Table 1), (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Poggio, Mujica, Gauci, Labanchi, Herrero, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Crowley, Santillán, Vizcaychipi, Seleiman, Sepulveda, Arezo, Cachau, Lamberti, Molina, Gino, Donadeu and Lightowlers2017).

Table 1. Assessment of echinococcosis prevalence during 12 year of control programme including dog deworming and vaccination in sheep in Rio Negro Province-Argentina

Statistically significant results were considered as P value <0.05; a vs b (P = 0.0016); b vs c (P = 0.23); a vs c (P = 0.0016); d vs e (P = 0.0004); e vs f P = 0.254); d vs f (P = 0.0013)

Human prevalence also decreased from 5.6% in 2009 to 0.12% in 2015 in the area. Ultrasonography screening showed no symptomatic cases nor any new cases in the period (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Uchiumi, Salvitti, Sobrino, Panomarenko, Tissot, Mercapide, Sustercic, Arezo, Mujica, Herrero, Labanchi, Grizmado, Araya, Talmon, Galvan, Sepulveda, Seleiman, Cornejo, Echenique and Del Carpio2019c). Assessing echinococcosis prevalence in different hosts after 15 years would allow the evaluation of the impact of vaccination.

Aysen-Chile vaccination control programme

From 1982 to 2001 the Agricultural Livestock Service (SAG) conducted a successful dog deworming programme every 45 days. Unfortunately, funding was not renewed thereafter (Catalán Carvajal, Reference Catalán Carvajal2007). In 2016, a Livestock Recomposition Transfer Programme started with sheep vaccination in Galera Chico-Balmaceda and El Maitén. After a great drought and the poor general condition of sheep, the programme was discontinued (Jensen, Reference Jensen and Jensen2021).

The SAG of the Aysén Region has been leading a CE control programme, which includes sheep vaccination, since 2020. It is financed by the Regional Government of Aysén and executed jointly with the Ministry of Health, being a milestone in the fight against CE.

This control programme promotes regional sheep repopulation, by enhancing herd immunity and improving the productivity of farms (Chacon, Reference Chacon2023). It involves the following components:

  1. 1. Registration and identification of vaccinated sheep and dogs, linked to epidemiologic units (EU).

  2. 2. Administering 1 dose to pregnant sheep and 2 doses for lambs, 1 month apart, in accordance with dental chronometry, clostridial vaccination and deworming.

  3. 3. Rigorous slaughter controls.

  4. 4. Monitoring EG95 antibody levels.

  5. 5. Necropsy on vaccinated sheep.

  6. 6. Parasitological diagnostic and quarterly dosing (deworming) implemented directly in the mouth of the dog.

  7. 7. A baseline survey about health education among the local population.

The reference population included 23 000 sheep, 1500 dogs, and 1500 goats in 312 EU that correspond to local peasant family farms. The number of EG95 vaccinations administered across the 3 years of the programme demonstrates high vaccination coverage at 89.9% (Table 2).

Table 2. Strategies of management in Aysen Region echinococcosis control programme including vaccination and dog dosing. Number of doses received by sheep and dogs and UE concerned (2020–2023).

It is noteworthy that while the programme aims to include 1500 dogs with 4 deworming treatments per year, achieving this target has proven challenging (Table 2).

The baseline health education survey showed a good knowledge of sheep–dog transmission, but a low level of knowledge of the dog–sheep transmission. Feeding dogs with viscera is common for economic reasons, underlining the importance of further health education and awareness efforts (Sepulveda Valenzuela, Reference Sepulveda Valenzuela2023). The cultural patterns and structure of peasant family farming in the region highlights the importance of engaging the women who own the house for the periodic deworming of dogs.

After 3 years of programme, encouraging preliminary results after the examination of animal viscera suggests a drastic decrease in the presence of cysts in vaccinated sheep, with the baseline prevalence in old animals as high as 70%. Besides, measurement of vaccine antibody levels has yielded results consistent with the references (Larrieu et al., Reference Larrieu, Poggio, Mujica, Gauci, Labanchi, Herrero, Araya, Grizmado, Calabro, Talmon, Crowley, Santillán, Vizcaychipi, Seleiman, Sepulveda, Arezo, Cachau, Lamberti, Molina, Gino, Donadeu and Lightowlers2017).

Considering a replacement rate of 20%, as older animals are gradually removed by vaccinated ones, and given that the programme is expected to continue for at least 9 or 10 years, it is well placed to achieve comprehensive and sustained success in reducing the prevalence of the disease. (Torgerson, Reference Torgerson2006; Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Saravia, Nuñez, Boado, Gómez and Heath2022b).

Discontinued vaccination programmes

The discontinued programmes from Chubut Province – El Chalia Colony (Argentina) and Alto Biobio Region (Chile) left lessons on the receptiveness of rural communities to vaccinating their flocks, and emphasized the importance of assessing the potential negative impacts of stopping these programmes, including the effect on public health goals. Indeed, in the aftermath prevalence can return to high levels when flock immunity is not persistent, and there can extensive social ramifications in different areas (cultural, beliefs, customs, community, rights, security, well-being, fears) that are usually not considered.

In this regard, the underfunded control programme from Alto Biobío Region (2016–2020) included a substantial Pehuenche population engaged in agricultural activities, particularly in breeding sheep and goat flocks. An innovative approach involving veterinarians who provided training to indigenous people-built trust between farmers and the healthcare teams. This training was conducted through a hands-on experiential learning process within the Alto Biobio community (Gädicke et al., Reference Gädicke, Heath, Medina-Brunet, Siva-de la Fuente, Espinoza-Rojas, Villaguala-Pacheco, Rubilar, Cerda, Quezada, Rojas, Henríquez, Loyola and Landaeta-Aqueveque2022; Poggio et al., Reference Poggio, Jensen, Saravia, Nuñez, Boado, Gómez and Heath2022b).

Therefore, vaccination programmes must consider not only the technical-epidemiological dimension, but also sociocultural understanding and analysis of the context in which they are operating.

Conclusion

The challenge of implementing straightforward instructions, such as avoiding feeding raw viscera to dogs and ensuring regular dosing, is rooted in complex socio-cultural factors, especially among autochthonous communities (Iriarte, Reference Iriarte, Elissondo, Dopchiz and Denegri2019). These cultural patterns are often overlooked in control programmes, highlighting the difficulty in effectively engaging these populations.

Despite these challenges, the Rio Negro programme demonstrated commendable compliance with the sheep vaccination schedule, even under adverse conditions. However, it is essential to recognize that while the vaccine prevents new infections, it does not affect established echinococcal cysts. Therefore, maintaining the vaccination schedule until all grazing animals are replaced is crucial for lasting disease control, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts and community engagement.

‘One Health Programs’ aiming to eliminate CE recognizes that even with the vaccine, it may take 10 years or more to succeed. Once the vaccination programme is over, health education and deworming efforts should be continued. The vaccine, now widely available and produced in Argentina, could be instrumental in potentially eliminating E. granulosus s.l. from South America.

The most promising strategies for effective disease control involve dog dosing and routinely vaccinating sheep and goats. However, maintaining the vaccination schedule until all grazing animals are replaced is critical for a comprehensive approach to disease management.

Data availability statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Joaquin Prada for proofreading the manuscript and Dr Paul Torgerson for kindly inviting us to write this contribution to this Special Issue from the XXIX Congress on Echinococcosis.

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Financial support

This work was supported by the National Research Council (CONICET) ‘Proyectos Unidades Ejecutoras’ PUE 22920180100014CO ICT – MILSTEIN (2018–2022).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this review.

Ethical standards

None.

References

Catalán Carvajal, FJ (2007) Análisis de casos y estimación de los costos de resolución quirúrgica en pacientes con hidatidosis en Hospital Regional de Coyhaique, 2001–2006. Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile. Available at http://cybertesis.uach.cl/tesis/uach/2007/fvc357a/doc/fvc357a.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Chacon, T (2023) Estado de situación sobre Hidatidosis en Chile y la región de Aysen. Marco Acuña Briones, SEREMI de Salud, Región de Aysen. Paper presented at the “Seminario de hidatidosis: Una Salud, Presente y Futuro”, 8 November, Coyhaique Alto Regional Museum, Aysén, Chile. Available at https://hidatidosis.ar/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Coyhaique-Tomas-Chacon.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Colombe, S, Togami, E, Gelaw, F, Antillon, M, Fuentes, R and Weinberger, DM (2017) Trends and correlates of cystic echinococcosis in Chile: 2001–2012. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11, e0005911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, PS and Larrieu, E (2006) Control of cystic echinococcosis/hydatidosis: 1863–2002. Advances in Parasitology 61, 443–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gädicke, P, Heath, D, Medina-Brunet, A, Siva-de la Fuente, MC, Espinoza-Rojas, H, Villaguala-Pacheco, C, Rubilar, M, Cerda, C, Quezada, M, Rojas, D, Henríquez, A, Loyola, M and Landaeta-Aqueveque, C (2022) Assessment of the vaccination program against cystic echinococcosis in sheep in the Pehuenche community of central Chile. Animals (Basel) 12, 679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, DD and Koolaard, J (2012) Serological monitoring of protection of sheep against Echinococcus granulosus induced by the EG95 vaccine. Parasite Immunology 34, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, DD, Jensen, O and Lightowlers, MW (2003) Progress in control of hydatidosis using vaccination--a review of formulation and delivery of the vaccine and recommendations for practical use in control programmes. Acta Tropica 85, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iriarte, J (2019) Importancia de la comunicación social. In Elissondo, MC, Dopchiz, MC and Denegri, GM (eds), La hidatidosis en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial de la UNRN-Eudem, pp. 271–290.Google Scholar
Jensen, O (2019) La vacuna EG95 en hospedadores intermediarios. In Elissondo, MC, Dopchiz, MC and Denegri, GM (eds), La hidatidosis en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial de la UNRN-Eudem, pp. 375–389.Google Scholar
Jensen, O (2021) Los ensayos realizados en Argentina y Chile. Su aplicación en programas de control en Chile. In Jensen, (ed.), La vacuna recombinante EG95 en hospederos intermediarios. Republic of Moldova, Europe: Editorial Académica Española, pp. 60–70.Google Scholar
Labanchi, JL, Poggio, TV, Gutiérrez, A, Mujica, G, Araya, D, Grizmado, C, Calabro, A, Crowley, P, Arezo, M, Seleiman, M, Herrero, E, Sepulveda, L, Talmon, G, Diaz, O and Larrieu, E (2022) Analysis of vaccination strategy against cystic echinococcosis developed in the Province of Río Negro, Argentina: 12 years of work. Veterinary Parasitology 310, 109790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E and Zanini, F (2012) Critical analysis of cystic echinococcosis control programs and praziquantel use in South America, 1974–2010. Revista panamericana de salud publica=Pan American Journal of Public Health 31, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Del Carpio, M, Mercapide, CH, Salvitti, JC, Sustercic, J, Moguilensky, J, Panomarenko, H, Uchiumi, L, Herrero, E, Talmon, G, Volpe, M, Araya, D, Mujica, G, Mancini, S, Labanchi, JL and Odriozola, M (2011) Programme for ultrasound diagnoses and treatment with albendazole of cystic echinococcosis in asymptomatic carriers: 10 years of follow-up of cases. Acta Tropica 117, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Herrero, E, Mujica, G, Labanchi, JL, Araya, D, Grizmado, C, Calabro, A, Talmon, G, Ruesta, G, Perez, A, Gatti, A, Santillán, G, Cabrera, M, Arezzo, M, Seleiman, M, Cavagión, L, Cachau, MG, Alvarez Rojas, CA, Gino, L, Gauci, CG, Heath, D, Lamberti, R and Lightowlers, MW (2013) Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: early impact and preliminary data. Acta Tropica 127, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Mujica, G, Gauci, CG, Vizcaychipi, K, Seleiman, M, Herrero, E, Labanchi, JL, Araya, D, Sepúlveda, L, Grizmado, C, Calabro, A, Talmon, G, Poggio, TV, Crowley, P, Cespedes, G, Santillán, G, García Cachau, M, Lamberti, R, Gino, L, Donadeu, M and Lightowlers, MW (2015) Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: second study of impact. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0004134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Poggio, TV, Mujica, G, Gauci, CG, Labanchi, JL, Herrero, E, Araya, D, Grizmado, C, Calabro, A, Talmon, G, Crowley, P, Santillán, G, Vizcaychipi, K, Seleiman, M, Sepulveda, L, Arezo, M, Cachau, MG, Lamberti, R, Molina, L, Gino, L, Donadeu, M and Lightowlers, MW (2017) Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: humoral response to the vaccine. Parasitology International 66, 258–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Gavidia, CM and Lightowlers, MW (2019a) Control of cystic echinococcosis: background and prospects. Zoonoses and Public Health 66, 889–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrieu, E, Mujica, G, Araya, D, Labanchi, JL, Arezo, M, Herrero, E, Santillán, G, Vizcaychipi, K, Uchiumi, L, Salvitti, JC, Grizmado, C, Calabro, A, Talmon, G, Sepulveda, L, Galvan, JM, Cabrera, M, Seleiman, M, Crowley, P, Cespedes, G, García Cachau, M, Gino, L, Molina, L, Daffner, J, Gauci, C, Donadeu, M and Lightowlers, MW (2019b) Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: 8 years of work. Acta Tropica 191, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrieu, E, Uchiumi, L, Salvitti, JC, Sobrino, M, Panomarenko, O, Tissot, H, Mercapide, CH, Sustercic, J, Arezo, M, Mujica, G, Herrero, E, Labanchi, JL, Grizmado, C, Araya, D, Talmon, G, Galvan, JM, Sepulveda, L, Seleiman, M, Cornejo, T, Echenique, H and Del Carpio, M (2019c) Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and follow up of cystic echinococcosis in asymptomatic carriers. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 113, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightowlers, MW, Lawrence, SB, Gauci, CG, Young, J, Ralston, MJ, Maas, D and Heath, DD (1996) Vaccination against hydatidosis using a defined recombinant antigen. Parasite Immunology 18, 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1996.tb01029.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightowlers, MW, Jensen, O, Fernandez, E, Iriarte, JA, Woollard, DJ, Gauci, CG, Jenkins, DJ and Heath, DD (1999) Vaccination trials in Australia and Argentina confirm the effectiveness of the EG95 hydatid vaccine in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 531–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, N, Martínez, P, Ayala, S and Canals, M (2021) Distribución y factores de riesgo de equinococosis quística humana en Aysén 2010–2016. Revista Chilena De Infectologia 38, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministerio de Agricultura Chile (2023) Available at https://minagri.gob.cl/noticia/programa-ovino-minagri-y-sag-destacan-trabajo-realizado-para-el-control-de-la-hidatidosis-en-la-region/ (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
MINSA–SENASA (2021) Gestión de las Zoonosis, un enfoque integrado Available at http://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/tools/teleconferencia/2021/SE272021/04.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Pavletic, CF, Larrieu, E, Guarnera, EA, Casas, N, Irabedra, P, Ferreira, C, Sayes, J, Gavidia, CM, Caldas, E, Lise, MLZ, Maxwell, M, Arezo, M, Navarro, AM, Vigilato, MAN, Cosivi, O, Espinal, M and Vilas, VJDR (2017) Cystic echinococcosis in South America: a call for action. Revista panamericana de salud publica=Pan American Journal of Public Health 41, e42.Google ScholarPubMed
Poggio, TV, Jensen, O, Mossello, M, Iriarte, J, Avila, HG, Gertiser, ML, Serafino, JJ, Romero, S, Echenique, MA, Dominguez, DE, Barrios, JR and Heath, D (2016) Serology and longevity of immunity against Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and llama induced by an oil-based EG95 vaccine. Parasite Immunology 38, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poggio, TV, Gómez, JM, Boado, LA, Vojnov, AA, Larrieu, E, Mujica, GB, Jensen, O, Gertiser, ML, Prada, JM and Basáñez, MG (2022a) Immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis in livestock: development and validation dataset of an ELISA test using a recombinant B8/2 subunit of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Data in Brief 42, 108255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggio, TV, Jensen, O, Saravia, TC, Nuñez, AP, Boado, LA, Gómez, JM and Heath, D (2022b) Past and future methods for controlling Echinococcus granulosus in South America. International Journal of Echinococcoses 1, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepulveda Valenzuela, N (2023) Seminario de hidatidosis en Aysen, Chile. “Una Salud, Presente y Futuro” (2023). Conocimiento y prácticas de riesgo sobre equinococosis quística en la población de la provincia Capitán Prat, región de Aysén. Available at https://hidatidosis.ar/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Coyhaique-Nicole-Sepulveda.pdf (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Torgerson, PR (2006) Mathematical models for the control of cystic echinococcosis. Parasitology International 55 Suppl, S253–S258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vivanco Concha, F, Wanga, Y, Sanhueza Aguilera, C, Zagmutt Méndeza, T and Vrsalovic Santibáñez, J (2021) Descripción epidemiológica de la hidatidosis hepática en Chile. Revista Confluencia 4, 35–39.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Assessment of echinococcosis prevalence during 12 year of control programme including dog deworming and vaccination in sheep in Rio Negro Province-Argentina

Figure 1

Table 2. Strategies of management in Aysen Region echinococcosis control programme including vaccination and dog dosing. Number of doses received by sheep and dogs and UE concerned (2020–2023).