Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:35:39.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the olfactory responses of insect parasites to the food plant of their host

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. H. Thorpe
Affiliation:
From the Department of Entomology, Zoological Laboratory, Cambridge
H. B. Caudle
Affiliation:
From the Department of Entomology, Zoological Laboratory, Cambridge

Extract

1. Pimpla ruficollis is a parasite of the pine shoot moth Rhyacionia (Evetria) buoliana Schiff. (Eucosmidae) which emerges from its host a considerable time before the next generation of larvae are ready for oviposition. It seems that during this period the parasites leave the pine trees and feed on the flowers of certain Umbelliferae and probably other plants. Only after 3 or 4 weeks do they return to the pine trees where the shoots now contain larvae ready for egg laying.

2. It has been shown by means of olfactometer experiments that during this first period of the adult life, the parasites are repelled by the odour of oil of Pinus sylvestris. At this time the ovaries are very small and are probably not ready for the production of eggs. After the third or fourth week of life the females become attracted by the oil of P. sylvestris and the ovaries are now relatively large.

3. Since Geraniol is known to be a constituent of certain conifers, this substance was also tested. It was, however, found to be invariably repellent to the parasites.

4. There is some evidence that conclusions reached as a result of experiments with P. ruficollis also apply to the ophionine ichneumonid Eulimneria rufifemur.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gildemeister, E. & Hoffmann, F. (1928). Die Ätherischen Öle. 3 vols. 3rd ed.Leipzig: Schimmel.Google Scholar
Laing, J. (1937). J. Anim. Ecol. 6, 298317.Google Scholar
Picard, F. & Rabaud, E. (1914). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. pp. 266–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1930). Bull. ent. Res. 21, 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. & Jones, F. G. W. (1937). Proc. roy. Soc. B, 124, 5681.Google Scholar