Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:43:23.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the structure and hatching of the eggs of Schistosoma mansoni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. R. Kusel
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

Extract

The structure and function of the vacuoles in the eggs of Schistosoma mansoni is unknown. In this study the eggs have been immersed in serum albumin and examined by phase-contrast optics. Under these conditions the vacuoles exhibit a definite internal structure, suggesting that they may be or may have been cellular. Histochemical staining techniques to detect the nature of the vacuolar contents revealed that the vacuoles stained heavily with iodine and gave a positive PAS reaction. This suggested the presence of carbohydrate. Stains for nucleic acids, protein and lipid were not taken up by the vacuoles. The egg shell stained with o–toluidine blue and with basic fuchsin uniformly, except for a thin irregular band which might indicate a possible line of weakness. The vacuolar membranes seem to be similar to the vitelline membrane in permeability to hydroxyl ions and it is possible that these membranes have a common origin. Plasmolysis studies with salts, urea, glycerol and sucrose showed that the vacuolar membranes have about the same permeability properties to these compounds as the other egg membranes. Glycerol treatment of the eggs until equilibrium is attained, followed by transfer of the eggs to water or saline results in a hatching of the eggs. In this, a dead mira-cidium is extruded from the shell. Similar treatment of eggs equilibrated with sucrose does not result in this hatching process. It is postulated that glycerol solubilizes a factor which aids the hatching process.

I should like to thank the following: Dr S. A. Ibrahim, in whose department this work was carried out; Dr S. Dawood of the Stack Laboratory, Khartoum, who kindly made his microscope available for use; Mr J. R. Lauder for valuable discussions and suggestions; and many young patients in Khartoum Civil Hospital for stool samples and smiles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barer, R. (1964). In Cytology and Cell Physiology, 3rd ed. Ed. Bourne, G. H.. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eames, A. J. & MacDaniels, L. H. (1947). An Introduction to Plant Anatomy, 2nd ed.McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Lengy, J. (1962). Studies on Schistosoma bovis in Israel. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, 10 E, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1961). Histochemistry, 2nd ed.London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google ScholarPubMed
Rowan, W. B. (1956). The mode of hatching of the egg of Faseiola hepatica. Experimental Parasitology 5, 118–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowan, W. B. (1962). Permeability of the egg shell of Faseiola hepatica. Journal of Parasitology 48, 499.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1966). The Physiology of the Trematodes. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1947). Physiological and histochemical observations on the adult liver fluke, Faseiola hepatica L. III. Egg shell formation. Parasitology 38, 128–39.Google Scholar
Watson, J. M. (1960). Medical Helminthology. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox Ltd.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1967). The structure and permeability of the egg shell and vitelline membrane of the egg of Faseiola hepatica. Parasitology 57, 4758.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1968). The hatching mechanism of the egg of Faseiola hepatica. Parasitology 58, 7989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed