Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:46:51.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the haemocytic reaction of Gammarus spp., and its relationship to Polymorphus minutus (Acanthocephala)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. W. T. Crompton
D. W. T. Crompton
Affiliation:
The Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The haemocytes of Gammarus, which are part of the environment of P. minutes, have been found to react by encapsulation, against a variety of foreign bodies, wounded tissues and interspecific transplants. Cuticular wounds appear to present the most urgent stimulus to the haemocytes. The haemocytic reaction is not suppressed by X-irradiation. Differences in haemolymph salt concentration between G. pulex and G. duebeni do not appear to be responsible for the failure of transplants of tissue from G. pulex to G. duebeni. It is concluded that the haemocytic reaction of Gammarus is very similar in response and nature to that of insects.

Healthy P. minutus does not stimulate the haemocytic reactions of its hosts, but wounded or damaged parasites are encapsulated. The capsule of connective tissue, which surrounds the parasite during its development in the haemocoele of the intermediate host, appears to be essential for the parasite's survival.

I am most grateful to Dr P. Tate for helpful discussions, and Dr George Salt, F.R.S., for his advice and criticism of the manuscript. I also wish to thank Drs H. Laser and B. E. B. Moseley for irradiating the amphipods for me.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , May 1967 , pp. 389 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crompton, D. W. T. (1964). The envelope surrounding Polymorphic minutus (Goeze, 1782) (Acanthocephala) during its development in the intermediate host, Gammarus pulex. Parasitology 54, 721–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, M. F. (1952). Wound healing in the gut of the cockroach Periplaneta. Aust. J. scient. Res. B, 5, 282–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodey, J. B. (1957). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech. Bull. Min. Agric. Fish. Food, no. 2. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Goodrich, H. P. (1928). Reactions of Gammarus to injury and disease, with notes on some microsporidial and fungoid diseases. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 72, 325–53.Google Scholar
Hardy, W. B. (1892). The blood corpuscles of Crustacea, together with a suggestion as to the origin of the crustacean fibrin-ferment. J. Physiol. 13, 165–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N. & Nicholas, W. L. (1957). The development of Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) (Acanthocephala) in the intermediate host. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 51, 380–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hynes, H. B. N. & Nicholas, W. L. (1958). The resistance of Gammarus spp. to infection by Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782) (Acanthocephala). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52, 376–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, A. P. M. (1961 a). The urine of Gammarus duebeni and G. pulex. J. exp. Biol. 38, 647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, A. P. M. (1961 b). ‘Ringer’ solutions and some notes on the physiological basis of their chemical composition. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2, 241–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A. (1959). Notes on Microscopical Technique for Zoologists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed.London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1955). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. VIII. Host reactions following artificial parasitization. Proc. R. Soc. B 144, 380–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. (1956). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. IX. The reactions of a stick insect to an alien parasite. Proc. R. Soc. B 146, 93–108.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1957). Experimental studies in insect parasitism X. The reactions of some endopterygote insects to an alien parasite. Proc. R. Soc. B 147, 167–84.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1960 a). Surface of a parasite and the haemocytic reaction of its host. Nature, Lond. 188, 162–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. (1960 b). Experimental studies in insect parasitism. XI. The haemocytic reaction of a caterpillar under varied conditions. Proc. R. Soc. B 151, 446–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. (1961). The haemocytic reaction of insects to foreign bodies. In The Cell and the Organism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1963). The defence reactions of insects to metazoan parasites. Parasitology 53, 527–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed