Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:49:21.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the Functional morphology of the Scolex and of the Genitalia in Echinobothrium brachysoma Pintner and E. affine Diesing from Raja clavata L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Gwendolen Rees
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Extract

1. Echinobothrium brachysoma Pintner and E. affine Diesing have been found in the spiral valve of Raja clavata L. off the coast of Britain.

2. The spiral valve is lined by tubular crypts into which the scolices of the worms are thrust, the strobila, with one gravid proglottid, being free in the lumen.

3. The functional morphology of the scolex of E. brachysoma has been described. That of E. affine appears to be similar.

4. The scolex adheres, mainly, by the apical hooks which can be raised by inner and outer elevator muscles attached to their roots and closely associated with the rostellum.

5. The rostellum can be protruded by the contraction of a dorsal and a ventral protractor muscle. Movements of the rostellum elongate the scolex in a dorsoventral direction, forcing the apical hooks against the crypt wall and supporting them.

6. The peduncle hooks are not often embedded in the epithelium. Both series of hooks damage the epithelial lining of the crypt.

7. The remaining musculature, excretory and nervous systems are described.

8. The genitalia are essentially the same in both species. The number of testes varies from one proglottid to another in the same worm. In E. brachysoma the mid-ventral genital atrium is near the posterior end which affects the course of the vagina. The eggs in both species include two yolk cells which are similar to those of the Digenea and Pseudophyllidea.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beauchamp, M. de (1905). Études sur les cestodes Sélaciens. Arch. Parasit. 9, 463539.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1849). Notice sur un nouveau genre d'helminthe cestoide. Bull. acad. roy. soc. sci. Belg. 16, 182–93.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1861). Mémoire sur les vers intestinaux. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Suppl. 2, 1376.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1871). Les poissons des côtes de Belgique et leur parasites. Nouv. Mém. Acad. roy. Bruxelles, 38, 98.Google Scholar
Diesing, K. M. (1863). Revision du Cephalocotyleen. Abtheilung: Paramecocotyleen. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Abt. 1, 48, 200345.Google Scholar
Euzet, L. (1951). Echinobothrium Mathiasi n.sp. (Cestode diphyllidea) parasite d'une Raie: (Leiobatis aquila, L.). Bull. soc. zool. Fr. 76, no. 3, 182–8.Google Scholar
Heller, A. F. (1949). Parasites of cod and other marine fish from the Baie de Chaleur region. Canad. J. Res. 27 (5), Sect. D, 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. & Baer, J. G. (1936). Cestodes. Faune Fr. 30.Google Scholar
LespÈs, M. Ch. (1957). Une nouvelle espèce du genre Echinobothrium. Ann. Sci. Nat. (zoologie), 7, 118–19.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. & Pagenstecher, A. (1858). Untersuchungen über niedere Seethiere: Echinobothrium typus. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Lpz., 15, 600–9.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1866-7). Entozoa iakttagna hos Scandinavian Hafsfiskar. Acta. Univ. Lundensis math. o. naturv. Vetensk. 3 (3), 151.Google Scholar
Pintner, Th. (1889). Neue Untersuchungen über den Bau des Bandwurmkörpers. 1. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Echinobothrium. Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, 8, 371420.Google Scholar
Ruszkowski, J. S. (1927). Études sur le cycle évolutif et sur la structure des cestodes de mer. 1. Echinobothrium Benedeni n.sp., ses larves et sur l'hôte intermédiaire Hipppolyte varians, Leach. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Let., Série B, 719–38.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. & Hornell, J. (1906). Report on cestode and nematode parasites from the marine fishes of Ceylon. Herdman's Pearl Oyster Report, Pt. 5, 4396.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1925). A monograph on the Tetraphyllidea. Mem. Lpool Sch. Trop. Med. (N.S.), 2, 1368.Google Scholar
Wagener, G. R. (1854). Die Entwicklung der Cestoden. Nova. Acta. Acad. nat. curios., 24, Suppl. 2191.Google Scholar