Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:08:06.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on ascaridoid nematodes in pythons: redefinition of Ophidascaris filaria and Polydelphis anoura

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. A. Sprent
J. F. A. Sprent
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Host records, geographical distribution, and the taxonomy and synonymy, of the ascaridoid nematodes recorded as occurring in the python family, are presented. The evidence indicates that, besides Amplicaecum robertsi, which is so far reported only from Australian pythons, and possibly Hexametra quadricornis, there are two other distinct species which can be regarded as natural parasites of pythons, namely Ophidascaris filaria and Polydelphis anoura; these two species are described from specimens from Queensland pythons and compared with specimens from Africa and India. Perhaps it may eventually be established that further distinct species, or subspecies can be differentiated among the ascaridoid nematodes of pythons in different geographic areas, in addition to the above-named species. But it is suggested that the existing criteria for differentiation of other previously named species are not valid. Accordingly, it is proposed that the following specific names be reduced to synonymy within these two species respectively. Under O. filaria: rubicunda (male), infundibulicola, baylisi, and amucronata; ajgaris is a doubtful species. Under P. anoura: attenuata rubicunda (female), oculata, and bicornuta; mucronata is a doubtful species.

Grateful acknowledgement is made of help, advice and co-operation on various aspects of this work which have been received from the following: Dr W. W. Becklund, Beltsville, Md.; Dr A. G. Chabaud, Museum National d'Histoire naturelle, Paris; Mr H. G. Cogger, The Australian Museum, Sydney; Dr G. Hartwich, Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Zoologisches Museum, Der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Dr W. G. Inglis, British Museum (Natural History); London; Dr P. Tate, University of Cambridge.

The invaluable technical assistance of Ann McKeown and Marian Hollis is also gratefully acknowledged.

This work was financed by a grant from the Australian Research Grants Committee.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 129 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, L. R. & Beaver, P. C. (1963). Redeseription of Ophidascaris labiatopapillosa Walton, 1927, an ascarid parasite of North American snakes. J. Parasit. 49, 765–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baylis, H. A. (1920). On the classification of the Ascaridae. II. The Polydelphis group; with some account of other ascarids parasitic in snakes. Parasitology 12, 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1936). The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and, Burma. Nematoda. Vol. 1. Ascaroidea and Strongyloidea, 408 pp. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. & Daubney, R. (1923). A further report on parasitic nematodes in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India. Rec. Indian Mus. 25, 551–78.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. & Daubney, R. (1926). A Synopsis of the Families and Genera of Nematoda, 277 pp. London: printed by order of the trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux, 654 pp. Paris: Librairie encyclopédique de Roret.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedoelst, L. (1916). Notes sur la faune parasitaire du Congo Beige. Rev. zool afr. 5, 1–90.Google Scholar
Hamerton, A. E. (1936). Report on the deaths occurring in the Society's gardens during the year 1935. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 3, 659–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, C. M. (1939). Parasites obtained from animals in the collection of the New York zoological park during 1938. Zoologica, N.Y. 24, 481–5.Google Scholar
Hsü, H. F. & Hoeppli, R. J. C. (1931). Parasitic nematodes mostly from snakes collected in China. Natn. med. J. China 17, 567–88.Google Scholar
Hsü, H. F. & Hoeppli, R. J. C. (1938). Miscellaneous observations on ten species of parasitic nematodes. Chin. med. J. Suppl. 2, 451–60.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Mawson, P. M. (1948). Some new records of nematodes from Australian snakes. Rec. S. Aust. Mus. 9, 101–6.Google Scholar
Khera, S. (1954). Nematode parasites of some Indian vertebrates. Indian J. Helminth. 6, 27–113.Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A. (1940). Beiträge zur Kenntnis parsitischer Nematoden. IX. Parsitische Nematoden aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum Basel. Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitKde 145, 63–208.Google Scholar
Kutzer, E. P. & Grünberg, W. (1965). Parsitologie und pathologie der spulwurmkrankheit der schlangen. Zentbl. Vet Med. 12, 155–75.Google Scholar
Kutzer, E. & Lamina, J. (1965). Zur biologie einiger schlangenascariden. Z. Parasit Kde 25, 211–30.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1891). Notice of some entozoa. Proc. Acad. natn. Sci. Philad. [v. 43, 3s., v. 21], 234–6.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. F. B. von (1899). Nematoden aus der berliner zoologischen Sammlung. Mitt. zool. Samml. Mus. Naturk. Berl. 1, 3–28.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. F. B. von (1903). Parsiten, meistens Helminthen, aus Siam. Arch. mikrosk. Anat. Entw Mech. 62, 108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mawson, P. M. (1955). Some parasites of Australian vertebrates. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 78, 1–7.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1858). Prospectus helminthum, quae in prodromo faunae helminthologicae Venetiae continentur. Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien 30, 127–58.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1861). Prodromus faunae helminthologicae venetae adjectis disquisitionibus anatomicis et criticis. Denkschr. Akad. Wiss., Wien, Math. Nat. Kl. 19, 2 Abt., 189–338.Google Scholar
Mozgovoi, A. A. (1953). Fundamentals of Nematodology. Vol. 2. Ascaridata of Animals and Man and the Diseases they cause. Pts. 1 and II, 351 + 616 pp. Moscow.Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J. (1922). On the hatching and migration in a mammalian host of larvae of ascarids normally parasitic in cold-blooded vertebrates. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 25, 97–100.Google Scholar
Osche, G. (1958). Beiträge zur Morphologie, Okologie und Phylogenie der Ascaridoidea (Nematoda) Parallelen in der Evolution von Parasit und Wirt. Z. ParasitKde 18, 479–572.Google Scholar
Panagia, A. (1933). Su die una nuova specie del Gen. Polydelphis (P. mucronata). Annali Med. nav. colon. Year 39, 1, 76–88.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1898). Elminti raccolti dal Dott. Elio Modigliani alle isole Mentawei, Engano e Sumatra. Annali Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Giacomo Doria 39, 2s., 19, 102–24.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. & Henry, A. C. (1910). Sur quelques helminthes du ‘Python sebae’ (Gmelin) Bull. Soc. Path exot. 3, 94–8.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. A. (1830). Beskrifning ofver en ny art Spolmask, funnen hos Python bivittatus jemte anatomiska anmärkningar. K. Vetensk. Acad. Handl., Stockholm (1829) (1), pp. 103–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, V. C. (1934). On a collection of parasitic worms from Malay. I. Nematodes (super-families Ascaroidea and Oxyuroidea). Parasitology 26, 481–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K. P. & Inger, R. F. (1957). Living Reptiles of the World, 287 pp. London: Hamish Hamilton Ltd.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. F. (1866). Monographie der nematoden, 357 pp. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1937). Parasitic nematoda. Explor. Pare. natn. Albert Miss. G. F. de Witte, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1903). On the ento-parasites collected by the ‘Skeat Expedition’ to Lower Siam and the Malay Peninsula in the years 1899–1900. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 2, 145–56.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J. (1908). Synopsis of studies in metazoan parasitology in McManes laboratory of pathology, University of Pennsylvania. Med. Bull. Univ., Pa. 20, 262–82.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1963). The life history and development of Amplicaecum robertsi, an ascaridoid nematode of the carpet python (Morelia spilotes variegatus). I. Morphology and functional significance of larval stages. Parasitology 58, 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. & Mines, J. J. (1960). A new species of Amplicaecum (Nematoda) from the carpet snake (Morelia argus variegatus): with a re-definition and a key for the genus. Parasitology 50, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, C. W. & Hassall, A. (1920). Index-Catalogue of Medical and Veterinary Zoology. Subjects: Roundworms, 886 pp. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1895). Notizie elmintologiche. Boll. Soc. adriat. Sci. nat. 16, 33–46.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1896). Il genere Ascaris Linne. Lavoro monografico. Boll. Soc. adriat. Sci. nat. 17, 9–120.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1920). Contribuicao para a sistematica dos Ascaroidea. Archos Esc. sup. Agric. Med. vet. Pinheiro 4, 15.Google Scholar
Wallace, F. G. (1936). Polydelphis attenuate (Nematoda: Ascaridae) from a Hainan python. Lingnan Sci. J. 15, 309–10.Google Scholar
Walton, A. C. (1927). A revision of the nematodes of the Leidy collections. Proc. Acad. natn. Sci. Philad. 27, 49–163.Google Scholar
Wedl, C. (1862). Zur helminthenfauna Ägyptens. Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien. 44, 1 Abt. [(9)], 463–82.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1961). Systema helminthum. Vol. 3. The Nematodes of Vertebrates, 1261 pp. New York: Interscience Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., Fujimoto, Y. & Ohbayashi, M. (1953). On three species of parasites collected from the intestine of a reticulated python. Mem. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido Univ. 1, 509–12.Google Scholar
Yorke, W. & Maplestone, P. A. (1926). The Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates, 536 pp. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar