Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:33:34.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure and function of the adhesive organ in strigeid trematodes

Part II. Diplostomum spathaceum Braun, 1893

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Christina Öhman
Christina Öhman
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A short account of the biology and life-cycle of Diplostomum spathaceum is given.

The morphology of the forebody is described in some detail. The lappets are well developed and function as organs of attachment as well as being reservoirs for the secretion from the forebody gland cells. The adhesive organ is variable in form and the muscles facilitating the movements are described in detail. Pressure changes in the excretory system are thought to assist in evaginating the adhesive organ.

The histochemical tests gave the following results. The phosphatases present in the adhesive organ and the forebody gland cells are of the acid variety, the alkaline phosphatase is only present in the cuticle, traces of it occur in the lappets and forebody gland cells. No leucine aminopeptidase activity was observed. The esterase present is either a pseudocholinesterase or a non-specific B-esterase. The presence of RNA is confined to areas of enzyme formation.

The in vitro studies confirmed the absence of alkaline phosphatase and the presence of acid phosphatase and esterase in the forebody. They also showed a secretion of acid phosphatase and esterase to the exterior of the parasite.

Diplostomum spathaceum has very little effect on the host mucosa, but some lysis of the host tissues in contact with the forebody and especially the lappets, is observed. The response of the host to the parasite is likewise very small.

The source of nutrients for D. spathaceum is believed to be the contents of the host alimentary tract, host mucus secretions and to a small extent disintegrated host tissues.

I am very grateful to Dr D. A. Erasmus for advice and encouragement during this study and to Professor J. Brough for his interest and for provision of excellent working facilities. The work was conducted during the tenure of a Rotary Foundation Scholarship for International Understanding and a grant from Nylands Nation (Helsingfors, Finland).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 1965 , pp. 481 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvy, L. (1954). Distomatose cêrébro-rachidienne due à Diplostomulum phoxini (Faust), Hughes 1920, chez Phoxinus laevis AG. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 29, 510–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. G. (1933). Contribution a l'étude de la faune helminthologique africaine. Rev. suisse Zool. 40, 31–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1939). A larval trematode (Diplostomulum volvens) in the lens of the eye of a rainbow trout. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 151, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, G. (1890). Die Familie der Holostomiden. Zool. Jber. 5, 553–604.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1894). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holostomiden. Zool. Anz. 17, 165–7.Google Scholar
Bueding, E. (1952). Acetylcholinesterase activity of Schistosoma mansoni. Br. J. Pharmac. Chemother. 7, 563–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bueding, E. (1962). Comparative biochemistry of parasitic helmiths. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 4, 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. (1963). Morphological and histochemical observations on Polymorphus minutus (Goeze, 1782), with special reference to the body wall. Parasitology, 53, 663–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, B. (1952). Trematode life-cycle enacted in a London pond. Nature, Lond., 170, 72–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, G. (1953). Systématique des Strigeida CompléAment de la monographie. Mém. Soc. neuchât. Sci. nat. 8, 1–141.Google Scholar
Erasmus, D. A. (1958). Studies on the morphology, biology and development of a strigeid cercaria (Cercaria X, Baylis, 1930). Parasitology, 48, 312–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erasmus, D. A. (1962). Studies on the adult and metacercaria of Holostephanus lühei Szidat, 1936. Parasitology, 52, 353–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, D. A. & Öhman, C. (1963). The structure and function of the adhesive organ in strigeid trematodes. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 113, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farner, O. S. (1960). Digestion and digestive system. In Biology and Comparative Physiology of Birds, vol. 1. Ed. Marshall, A. J.. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. B. (1962). Further studies on feeding and digestion in triclad Turbellaria. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 123, 571–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, R. (1914). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hemistominen. Z. wiss. Zool. 112, 93–238.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1962). Studies on the function of the pseudosuckers and holdfast organ of Diplostomum phoxini Faust (Strigeida, Trematoda). Parasitology, 52, 103–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, R. D. & Glenner, G. G. (1957). Aldehyde blockade by aniline in glacial acetic acid. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 5, 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linstow, O. von (1877). Enthelminthologica. Arch. Naturgesch. 43, 173–98.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. J. & Miller, A. T. (1963). Acid and alkaline phosphatase changes associated with feeding, starvation and regeneration in planarians. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 3, 285–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed.998 pp. London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. M. & Ditzion, B. (1963). Enzymic histochemistry of granular components in digestive gland cells of the roman snail Helix pomatia. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 124, 211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. M. & Rolon, C. I. (1960). Intracellular digestion and hydrolytic enzymes in the phagocytes of planarians. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 118, 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, R. M. & Wittner, M. (1962). Intracytoplasmic particles and enzymes associated with feeding and digestion in Paramecium caudatum. The possible role of the neutral red granules. Arch. Protistenk. 106, 223–40.Google Scholar
Szidat, L. (1924). Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holostomiden. II. Zool. Anz. 61, 249–66.Google Scholar
Szidat, L. (1929). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Strigeida. I. Z. Parasitenk. 8, 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Duijn, P. (1961). Acrolein-Schiff a new staining method for proteins. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 9, 234–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Haitsma, J. P. (1931). Studies on the trematode family Strigeidae. XXIII. Diplostomum flexicaudum (Cort & Brooks) and stages in its life-history. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci., 13, 483–516.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1958). The distribution of esterase in the nervous system and other tissues of the insect Rhodnius prolixus. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 99, 441–50.Google Scholar
Williams, G. & Jackson, D. S. (1956). Ethanol aminoacridine hydrochloric acid fixative for acid mucopolysaccharides. Stain Tech. 31, 189–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1958). Systema Helminthum. Vol. 1. The Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates. 1575 pp. New York: Interscience Publishers Inc.Google Scholar