Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:01:31.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Structure and Biology of Haemaphysalis punctata, Canestrini and Fanzago. I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

The importance of various species of ticks in relation to the propagation of protozoal diseases, is so generally recognised that it has appeared to us eminently desirable to make a detailed study of one of the common species. Such a study has seemed to us specially necessary for the reason that our knowledge of these parasites is very imperfect, in spite of the fact that they possess an economic interest of the first order. Some of the diseases which ticks transmit, notably those due to the haematozoal parasites belonging to the genus Piroplasma, are among the most devastating affections of domesticated animals in many parts of the world, the useful animals which suffer from piroplas-mosis being cattle, sheep, goats, horses, and dogs. The disease known as “Heart-water,” occurring in South Africa and affecting sheep, goats and cattle, is likewise tick-transmitted. A disease of the domesticated fowl, analogous to relapsing fever in man, likewise of economic importance and occurring in different parts of the world, has also been demonstrated to be transmitted from animal to animal through the agency of ticks. The fowl disease is due to a Spirochaeta which is conveyed by ticks; the same holds for human “tick fever” and a spirochaete infection in cattle occurring in parts of Africa. Recent investigation appears to have clearly established the fact that a tick conveys spotted or Rocky Mountain Fever to man. Moreover it has been claimed that a Nematode worm, the Filaria perstans, parasitic in man, undergoes its development in a tick which is capable of conveying the parasite from one human host to another. There can be no doubt but that ticks will be found, upon further investigation, to be associated in the transmission of an increasing number of diseases in animals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlese, A. (1889 and 1891). Acari, Myriapoda, et Scorpiones in Italia reperta. Fasc. lv. No. 1, 1889 (nymph). Fasc. lviii. No. 10, 1891 (adult).Google Scholar
Cambridge, O. Pickard (1889). On a new species of Haemaphysalis, C. L. Koch, imported into England by Syrrhaptes paradoxus. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist. (London), (6), iii. p. 406, 2 Text Figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canestrini, G. and Fanzago, F. (1877). Intorno agli acari italiani. Atti del reale Institute Veneto (5), iv. p. 189.Google Scholar
Canestrini, G. (1890). Prospetto dell' Acarofauna italiana, iv. pp. 523526. Pl. XLI, Figs. 6 and 6a.Google Scholar
Haller, G. (1882). Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Milbenfauna Württembergs. Jahreshefte des Vereins für vaterländische Naturkunde in Württemberg, 38. Jahrgang, pp. 293325, Plate V, Figs. 4 and 5.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1844). Systematische Uebersicht ueber die Orduung der Zecken. Arch. f. Naturgeschichte, (1), x. pp. 217239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1847). Uebersicht des Arachnidensystems. Nürnberg. Heft 2, p. 123, Plate XXVI, Fig. 97.Google Scholar
Koch, L. (1877). Verzeichniss der bei Nürnberg bis jetzt beobachteten Arachniden. Abhandl. der Naturh. Ges. zu Nürnberg, vi. p. 196.Google Scholar
Mégnin, P. (1880). Les Parasites et les Maladies parasitaires chez l'homme, les animaux domestiques, et les animaux avec lesquels ils peuvent ĉtre en contact. Insectes, Arachnides, Crustacés, Paris, p. 132.Google Scholar
Murray, A. (1877). Economic Entomology, i. (Aptera), p. 192.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G. (1897). Révision de la famille des Ixodidés, 2me Mém. Mém. de la Soc. zool. de France, X. p. 327.Google Scholar
Neumann, L. G. (1901). Révision de la famille des Ixodidés, 2me Mém. Mém. de la Soc. zool. de France 4me Mém. xiv. 240.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F., Cooper, W. F. and Smedley, R. D. (1905). The Buccal Apparatus of a tick (Haemaphysalis punctata, C. and F.). Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1905, Section D.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. (1900). Rare English Ticks. Zoologist, (4), iv. pp. 326, 327.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1895). Traité de Zoologie médicale et agricole, 2me éd. p. 714.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1892). Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Milben. Zool. Anzeiger, xv. p. 316.Google Scholar
Wheler, E. G. (1906). British Ticks. Journ. Agric. Science, i. p. 400, Plate X, Figs. 30—32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar