Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:17:03.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The spatial organization and extraction of the wall-forming bodies of Eimeria maxima

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2013

SONJA FRÖLICH ,
MICHAEL JOHNSON ,
MICHELLE ROBINSON ,
ROLF ENTZEROTH  and
MICHAEL WALLACH
SONJA FRÖLICH
Affiliation:
The iThree Institute, School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Affiliation:
The iThree Institute, School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
MICHELLE ROBINSON
Affiliation:
The iThree Institute, School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
ROLF ENTZEROTH
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstraße 10, 01062 Dresden, Germany
MICHAEL WALLACH*
Affiliation:
The iThree Institute, School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: The iThree Institute, School of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia. Tel.: +61-2-9514-4082. Fax: +61-2-9514-4026. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eimeria maxima has been used as a model apicomplexan parasite to study sexual stage development and oocyst wall formation. A complete understanding of the wall's biochemical and biophysical properties is of great interest in research on all apicomplexan parasites. Purified gametocytes, zygotes and oocysts were analysed by three-dimensional confocal microscopy, and wide-field fluorescent microscopy was used to investigate the appearance and spatial organization of the 2 types of wall-forming bodies (WFBs). In addition, a variety of staining procedures and immunoassays were used to assess the biosynthesis, metabolic activity, intactness and molecular composition of the WFBs in situ. WFBs were extracted from gametocytes/zygotes and their composition was assessed by microscopy and SDS-PAGE analysis. It was concluded that isolated gametocytes are intact and metabolically active. Additionally, it was observed that the Type 1 WFBs are aligned at the periphery of the parasite and fuse together producing neutral lipid rich patches that appear to be inserted into the space between 2 parasite-specific membranes. Finally, it was shown that the WFBs extracted from purified gametocytes had the same shape, size and staining properties as those observed in situ, and contained the major glycoprotein antigens known to be present in these organelles.

Keywords

Eimeria maximagametocyteswall-forming bodiesthree-dimensional confocal microscopylipid patchesoocyst wall
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 140 , Issue 7 , June 2013 , pp. 876 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belli, S. I., Lee, M., Thebo, P., Wallach, M. G., Schwartsburd, B. and Smith, N. C. (2002 a). Biochemical characterisation of the 56 and 82 kDa immunodominant gametocyte antigens from Eimeria maxima. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belli, S. I., Witcombe, D., Wallach, M. G. and Smith, N. C. (2002 b). Functional genomics of Gam56: characterisation of the role of a 56 kilodalton sexual stage antigen in oocyst wall formation in Eimeria maxima. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 1727–1737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belli, S. I., Wallach, M. G., Luxford, C., Davies, M. J. and Smith, N. C. (2003). Roles of tyrosine-rich precursor glycoproteins and dityrosine- and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-mediated protein cross-linking in development of the oocyst wall in the coccidian parasite Eimeria maxima. Eukaryotic Cell 2, 456–464. doi: 10.1128/ec.2.3.456-464.2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, D. J. P., Belli, S. I., Smith, N. C. and Wallach, M. G. (2003). The development of the macrogamete and oocyst wall in Eimeria maxima: immuno-light and electron microscopy. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1329–1340. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00185-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, S. D. and Greenspan, P. (1985). Application of nile red, a fluorescent hydrophobic probe, for the detection of neutral lipid deposits in tissue sections – comparison with oil red O. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 33, 833–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, M., Mencher, D., Sarshalom, O. and Wallach, M. (1992). Developmental gene-expression of 230-kilodalton macrogamete-specific protein of the avian coccidial parasite, Eimeria maxima. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 51, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frolich, S., Entzeroth, R. and Wallach, M. (2012). Comparison of protective immune responses to apicomplexan parasites. Journal of Parasitology Research 2012, 852591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenspan, P., Mayer, E. P. and Fowler, S. D. (1985). Nile red – a selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. Journal of Cell Biology 100, 965–973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mai, K., Sharman, P. A., Walker, R. A., Katrib, M., De Souza, D., McConville, M. J., Wallach, M. G., Belli, S. I., Ferguson, D. J. P. and Smith, N. C. (2009). Oocyst wall formation and composition in coccidian parasites. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 104, 280–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mai, K., Smith, N. C., Feng, Z.-P., Katrib, M., Slapeta, J., Slapetova, I., Wallach, M. G., Luxford, C., Davies, M. J., Zhang, X., Norton, R. S. and Belli, S. I. (2011). Peroxidase catalysed cross-linking of an intrinsically unstructured protein via dityrosine bonds in the oocyst wall of the apicomplexan parasite, Eimeria maxima. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehlhorn, E. S. A. H. (1971). Fine structure of macrogametes and oocysts of coccidia and related organisms. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 37, 1–43.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, H. (1972). Fine structural study on developmental stages of Eimeria maxima parasitic in common fowl. Differentiation of microgametes with special reference to nuclear divisions. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 40, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencher, D., Pugatsch, T. and Wallach, M. (1989). Antigenic properties of Eimeria maxima gametocytes. Cell free translation and detection with recovered chicken serum. Experimental Parasitology 68, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouafo, A. N., Weck-Heimann, A., Dubremetz, J. F. and Entzeroth, R. (2002). Monoclonal antibodies specific for the two types of wall-forming bodies of Emeria tenella macrogametes (Coccidia, Apicomplexa). Parasitology Research 88, 217–224. doi: 10.1007/s00436-001-0524-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S. and Marshak, D. R. (1999). Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittilo, R. M. and Ball, S. J. (1979). Fine structure of the developing macrogamete and oocyst wall formation in Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 79, R34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittilo, R. M. and Ball, S. J. (1980). The ultrastructural development of the oocyst wall of Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 81, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugatsch, T., Mencher, D. and Wallach, M. (1989). Eimeria maxima: isolation of gametocytes and their immunogenicity in mice, rabbits and chickens. Experimental Parasitology 68, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N. C., Wallach, M., Petracca, M., Braun, R. and Eckert, J. (1994). Maternal transfer of antibodies induced by infection with Eimeria maxima partially protects chickens against challenge with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 109, 551–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallach, M., Pillemer, G., Yarus, S., Halabi, A., Pugatsch, T. and Mencher, D. (1990). Passive immunization of chickens aganst Eimeria maxima infection with a monoclonal antibody developed against a gametocyte antigen. Infection and Immunity 58, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M., Halabi, A., Pillemer, G., Sarshalom, O., Mencher, D., Gilad, M., Bendheim, U., Danforth, H. D. and Augustine, P. C. (1992). Maternal immunization with gametocyte antigens as a means of providing protective immunity against Eimeria maxima in chickens. Infection and Immunity 60, 2036–2039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallach, M. G., Ashash, U., Michael, A. and Smith, N. C. (2008). Field application of a subunit vaccine against an enteric protozoan disease. PLoS ONE 3, e3948.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003948CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2010) World Health Report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar