Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:34:20.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Myxosporidia found in certain freshwater fishes water fishes in Quebec province, Canada1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. B. Fantham ,
Annie Porter  and
L. R. Richardson
H. B. Fantham
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, McGill University, Montreal
Annie Porter
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, McGill University, Montreal
L. R. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, McGill University, Montreal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Province of Quebec provides a magnificent field for fresh-water faunistic and ecological research on account of its numerous rivers and lakes. Investigations in ecology and ecological parasitology by the authors have revealed a rich fauna in the areas described herein.

Examinations of fourteen species of fresh-water fish have produced twenty-eight species of Myxosporidia, of which twenty-five are new and three have been already described. The existence of races or strains or varieties of some of the forms is demonstrated.

Descriptions and illustrations are given of twenty-eight Myxosporidia found by the authors in fresh-water fishes of Quebec Province. The new species include: Sphaerospora notropis, Myxidium percae, Zschokkella salvelini, Myxosoma notropis, M. commersonii, M. orbitalis, M. pfrille, M. media, M. ellipticoides, M. parellipticoides, Myxobolus poecilichthidis, M. dentium, M. percae, M. rhinichthidis, M. notropis, M. catostomi, M. couesii, M. hybo-rhynchi, M. subcircularis, M. transversalis, M. grandis, Henneguya fontinalis, H. fontinalis var. notropis, H. percae, H. salmonis and H. esocis. Myxosoma catostomi Kudo, Myxobolus conspicuus Kudo and M. ovoidalis Fantham are described from Canadian fishes. Details are given of a series of races, strains or varieties of Thelohanellus notatus Mavor, of Myxobolus catostomi, of M. notropis and of Henneguya fontinalis from other than the original host fish.

The pathology of the myxosporidian infections from the many different situations in the hosts is discussed. Unusual sites of infection are the palatine teeth of Esox maskinongy with Myxobolus dentium and the iris of the eye of Couesius plumbeus with Myxobolus couesii.

In connexion with the economic importance of the Myxosporidia found in Quebec fishes, the destruction of young fish, alteration of the character of the fauna dependent on the same, human food supply, possible epizootics in hatcheries and possible cross-infection of game fishes and other fishes of economic importance are considered. The immediate danger is not great; it is the future that may be imperilled.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 1939 , pp. 1 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerbach, M. (1906). Ein Myxobolus im Kopf von Gadus aeglefini L. Zool. Anz. 30, 568–70.Google Scholar
Auerbach, M. (1909). Bemerkung über Myxosporidien. Zool. Anz. 34, 65–82.Google Scholar
Auerbach, M. (1910). Die Cnidosporidien (Myxosporidien, Actinosporidien, Microsporidien). 261 pp. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, M. (1912). Studien über die Myxosporidien der norwegischen Seefische und ihre Verbreitung. Zool. Jb. Abt. Syst. 33, 1–50.Google Scholar
Awerinzew, S. (1913). Myxobolus magnus nov.spec. Zool. Anz. 42, 75–6.Google Scholar
Balbiani, G. (1883). Myxosporidies ou psorospermies des poissons. J. Micrograph. 7, 143–7, 197–204, 270–81.Google Scholar
Balbiani, G. (1884). Leçons sur les Sporozoaires. IV. Les Psorospermies des Poissons ou Myxosporidies, pp. 420–49. Paris.Google Scholar
Bütschli, O. (1882–1889). Protozoa. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs. I (Myxosporidia, pp. 590–603).Google Scholar
Cépède, C. (1906). Myxosporidies des poissons des Alpes françaises. Ann. Univ. Grenoble, 18, 57–68.Google Scholar
Da Cunha, A. & Fonseca, O. (1917). Sobre os Myxosporidios dos peixes brasileiros (nota previa). Brazil-med. 31, 321.Google Scholar
Davis, H. S. (1917). The Myxosporidia of the Beaufort Region. A systematic and biologic study. Bull. Bur. Fish., U.S.A., Document no. 855, 201–43.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1898). Studien zur Naturgeschichte der Protozoen. III. Über Myxosporidien. Zool. Jb. Abt. Anat. 11, 281–350.Google Scholar
Ellis, Marjorie F. (1930). Investigations on the protozoan fish parasites of the St Andrew's Region. Trans. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci. 17, 268–75.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (1919 a). Some parasitic Protozoa found in South African fishes and amphibians. S. Afr. J. Sci. 15, 337–8.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (1919 b). Some parasitic Protozoa found in South Africa. II. S. Afr. J. Sci. 16, 185–91.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (1930). Some parasitic Protozoa found in South Africa. XIII. S. Afr. J. Sci. 27, 376–90.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. & Porter, Annie (1912 a). “Some effects of the occurrence of Myxosporidia in the gall bladder of fishes.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 6, 467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, H. B. & Porter, Annie (1937). Some effects of the invasion of Myxosporidia on certain Canadian fishes. J. Parasit. 23, 565.Google Scholar
Gurley, R. R. (1893). On the classification of the Myxosporidia. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. for 1891, 11, 407–20.Google Scholar
Gurley, R. R. (1894). The Myxosporidia or psorosperms of fishes and the epidemics produced by them. Rep. U.S. Fish. Comm. 26, 65–304.Google Scholar
Herrick, A. (1936). Two new species of Myxobolus from fishes of Lake Erie. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 50, 194–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, S. (1915). Myxosporidiosis of Nipponese eel. J. Zool. 27, 372–82.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. P. (1929). Myxosporidia from Californian fishes. J. Parasit. 16, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, A. P. (1931). Notes on Californian Myxosporidia. J. Parasit. 18, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Bancroft, M. J. (1919). Some new sporozoon parasites of Queensland fresh-water fish. J. Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S.W. 52, 520–8.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. & Woodcock, H. M. (1907). On a myxosporidian infection of Gadus esmarkii. Trans. Lpool Biol. Soc. 21, 304–6.Google Scholar
Klokacewa, S. (1914). Über die Myxosporidien der Karausche. Zool. Anz. 44, 182–6.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. (1916). “Contributions to the study of parasitic Protozoa. III. Notes on Myxosporidia found in some fresh-water fishes of Japan, with the description of three new species.” J. Parasit. 3, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. (1917). Contributions to the study of parasitic Protozoa. II. Myxobolus toyamai nov.spec., a new myxosporidian parasite in Cyprinus carpio. J. Parasit. 3, 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. (1918). Contributions to the study of parasitic Protozoa. IV. Note on some Myxosporidia from certain fish in the vicinity of Wood's Hole. J. Parasit. 5, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. (1920). Studies on Myxosporidia. A synopsis of genera and species of Myxosporidia. Ill. Biol. Monogr. 5, 239–503. Independent pagination, 1–265.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. (1926). Development of a myxosporidian, Myxosoma catostomi nov.spec. Anat. Rec. 24, 369.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. (1929). Histozoic Myxosporidia found in fresh-water fishes of Illinois, U.S.A. Arch. Protistenk. 65, 364–78.Google Scholar
Kudo, R. (1933). A taxonomic consideration of Myxosporidia. Trans. Amer. micr. Soc. 52, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, R. (1934). Studies on some protozoan parasites of fishes of Illinois. Ill. Biol. Monogr. 13, 7–44.Google Scholar
Labbé, A. (1899). Sporozoa. 180 pp. Das Thierreich.Google Scholar
Léger, L. (1930). Sphaerospora pernicialis n.sp., nouvelle Myxosporidie pathogène pour la tanche. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 190, 849–51.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1891). Notice of the occurrence of protozoan parasites (psorosperms) on cyprinoid fishes in Ohio. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 9, 359–61.Google Scholar
Mavor, J. W. (1916 a). Studies on the protozoan parasites of the Georgian Bay. Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, ser. 3, 10, 63–73.Google Scholar
Mavor, J. W. (1916 b). On the occurrence of a parasite of the pike in Europe, Myxidium lieberkuhni Bütschli, in the pike on the American Continent. Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole, 31, 373–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavor, J. W. & Strasser, W. (1916). On a new myxosporidian, Henneguya wisconsinensis n.sp., from the urinary bladder of the yellow perch, Perca flavescens. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 18, 676–82.Google Scholar
Meglitsch, P. A. (1937). On some new and known Myxosporidia of the fishes of Illinois. J. Parasit. 23, 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeczek, A. (1911). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Myxo- und Microsporidie der Fische. Arch. Protistenk. 22, 143.Google Scholar
Nemeczek, A. (1922). Über Zschokkella rovignensis spec.nov. Arch. Protistenk. 45, 390–400.Google Scholar
Nemeczek, A. (1926). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Myxosporidien Brasiliens. Arch. Protistenk. 54, 137–49.Google Scholar
Parisi, B. (1912). Primo contributo alla Distribucione geografica dei Myxosporidi in Italia. Atti Soc. ital. Sci. nat. 50, 283–99.Google Scholar
Pinto, C. (1928). Henneguya wenyoni n.sp., Myxosporidie parasite des branchies de poisson d'eau douce de Brésil. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 98, 1580.Google Scholar
Plehn, Marianne (1924). Prakticum der Fischkrankheiten, pp. 301–479. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuss, R. (1906). Neue Myxoboliden von Süsswasserfischen. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. Petersb. ser. 5, 25, 199–205.Google Scholar
Schuberg, A. & Schröder, O. (1905). Myxosporidien aus dem Nervensystem und der Haut der Bachforelle (Myxobolus neurobius n.sp. und Henneguya nüsslini n.sp.). Arch. Protistenk. 6, 45–60.Google Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1920 a). Die Gattung Myxobolus. Arch. Protistenk. 41, 330–40.Google Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1920 b). Myxosporidienstudien. II. Die multiplikative und propagative Entwicklung der Myxosporidien. Arch. Protistenk. 41, 250–307.Google Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1920 c). Über einige Myxosporidien des Stichlings. Arch. Protistenk. 41, 321–9.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. & Prashad, B. (1918). Notes from the Bengal Fisheries Laboratory. No. 5. Parasites of Indian fishes, with a note on carcinoma in the climbing perch. Rec. Indian Mus. 15, 341–55.Google Scholar
Thélohan, P. (1895). Recherches sur les Myxosporidies. Bull. Sci. Fr. Belg. 26, 109–394.Google Scholar
Trojan, E. (1909). Ein Myxobolus im Auge von Leuciscus rutilus. Zool. Anz. 34, 679–82.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1920). Notes on North American Myxosporidia. J. Parasit. 6, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandt, F. (1923). Über ein Myxosporid des Seesaiblings (Salmo salvelinus L.). Zool. Anz. 57, 21–4.Google Scholar
Zandt, F. (1924). Fischparasiten des Bodensees. Zbl. Bakt. Abt. I, 92, 225–71.Google Scholar