Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:57:32.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Digenetic Trematodes of Marine Fishes of Beaufort, North Carolina1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. W. Manter
H. W. Manter
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1928, a collection of marine fish trematodes was made at the United States Bureau of Fisheries Station at Beaufort, North Carolina; thirty-six of fifty-one species of fishes examined contained trematodes; only one or two specimens of some species were examined. Only Monogenea were collected from Elasmo branchs. The following report includes the digenetic forms identified. Type specimens of all new species are deposited in the United States National Museum.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1931 , pp. 396 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Linton, Edwin (1898). Notes on Trematode parasites of fishes. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 20, 507–548, 15 p15.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1900). Fish parasites collected at Woods Hole in 1898. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. for 1899, 267–304, pis. 33–43.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1901). Parasites of fishes of the Woods Hole Region. Bull. U.S. Fish Comm. for 1899, 405–492, 34 pls.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1905). Parasites of fishes of Beaufort, North Carolina. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 24, 321–428, 33 pis.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1907). Notes on parasites of Bermuda fishes. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 33, 85–126, 15 pls.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1910). Helminth fauna of the Dry Tortugas. II. Trematodes. Papers from the Tort wja.s Lab, of the Carnegie Inst. of Wanhingion, 4, 11–98, 28 pls.Google Scholar
Linton, Edwin (1911). Trernatodes of the Dry Tortugas. Sci. N.S. 33, 303.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1907). Beitrage zur Systematik der Distomen. Zool. Jahr. Syst. 26, 63–180, 9 pls.Google Scholar
MacCallum, W. G. (1895). On the anatomy of two Distome parasites of fresh-water fish. Vet. Mag. 2, 1–12, 8 figs.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. A. (1921). Studies in Helminthology. Zoopathologica, 1, 137–284.Google Scholar
Nicoll, WM. (1909). Studies on the structure and classification of the digeneticTrematodes. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 53, 391–487, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Nicoll, WM. (1915). The Trematode parasites of North Queensland. Ill. Parasitology, 8, 22–40, 2 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, T. (1905). Die Trematoden des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica, 4 (2), 291–372, 3Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1911). Zum natürlichen System der digenen Trematoden. II. Zool. Anz. 37, 237–253.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1911 a). Zum naturlichen System der digenen Trematoden. III. Zool. Anz. 38, 97–117.Google Scholar
Ozaki, Y. (1928). Some Gasterostomatous Trematodes of Japan. Jap. Jour. Zool. 2, 35–60.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1926). Das System der Platodaria. Arch. f. Naturg. 96 (A), 112–244.Google Scholar
Simer, Park. H. (1929). Fish Trematodes from the Lower Tallahatchie River. Amer. Midland Nat. 11, 563–588.Google Scholar