Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:57:36.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segregation and co-occurrence of larval cestodes in freshwater fishes in the Bothnian Bay, Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. I. Andersen  and
E. T. Valtonen
K. I. Andersen
Affiliation:
Zoological Museum, University of Oslo, Norway
E. T. Valtonen
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Jyväskylä, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two autogenic (Triaenophorus crassus and T. nodulosus) and four allogenic (Diphyllobothrium latum, D. dendriticum, D. ditremum and Schistocephalus solidus) larval cestode species were found in 13 out of 31 fish species studied from the Bothnian Bay, NE Baltic. Gasterosteus aculeatus was the most heavily infected fish with 4 larval cestode species; for two of them (D. ditremum and S. solidus) the three-spined stickleback was found to be the required fish intermediate host. Among allogenic cestode species, those restricted to different definitive host species segregated their larval population in relation to the fish host, while, for example, D. ditremum and S. solidus, both maturing in fish-eating birds, had the highest percentage of co-occurrences. D. dendriticum, which had the widest range of definitive hosts, was found in the greatest number (8) of fish species and co-occurred with all other species found except T. crassus. The two autogenic species totally segregated their larval population from each other although they both require pike as definitive host. The ecological and evolutionary relationships behind the patterns found for larval cestodes are discussed.

Keywords

larval cestodessegregationco-occurrencefish
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 161 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alasaarela, E. (1979). Phytoplankton and environmental conditions in central and coastal areas of the Bothnian Bay. Annales Botanici Fennici 16, 241–74.Google Scholar
Andersen, K. (1979). Abnormal growth pattern of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) in Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Journal of Helminthology 53, 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K., Ching, H. & Vik, R. (1988). A review of freshwater species of Diphyllobothrium with redescriptions and the distribution of D. dendriticum (Nitzsch, 1824) and D. ditremum (Creplin, 1825) from North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 2216–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. I. & Valtonen, E. T. (1990). On the infracommunity structure of adult cestodes in freshwater fishes. Parasitology 101, 257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasson, S. & Petersson, B. (1982). The fish fauna of the Gulf of Bothnia. In Coastal Research in the Gulf of Bothnia: Monographiae Biologicae, Vol. 45 (ed. Müller, K.) pp. 301–15. The Hague, Boston and London: Dr W. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. E. & Margolis, L. (1987). Comparison of parasite fauna of juvenile sockey salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) from southern British Columbian and Washington State lakes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 420–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esch, G. W. (1971). Impact of ecological succession on the parasite fauna in centralchids from oligotrophic and eutrophic ecosystems. American Midland Naturalist 86, 160–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esch, G. W., Kennedy, C. R., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M. (1988). Patterns in helminth communities in freshwater fish in Great Britain: alternative strategies for colonization. Parasitology 96, 519–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halvorsen, O. (1970). Studies on the helminth fauna of Norway. XV. On the taxonomy and biology of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from north-western Europe. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 18, 114–74.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Andersen, K. (1974). Observations of Diphyllobothrium ditremum in an ecosystem. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 23, 201–2.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Andersen, K. (1984). The ecology of the interactions between arctic char Salvelinus alpinus and the plerocercoid stage of Diphyllobothrium ditremum. Journal of Fish Biology 25, 305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorsen, O. & Wissler, K. (1973). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway, XXVIII. An experimental study of the ability of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.), D. dendriticum (Nitzsch) and D. ditremum (Creplin) (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) to infect paratenic hosts. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 21, 201–10.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1973). Site selection by parasitic helminths: interspecific interactions, site segregation, and their importance to the development of helminth communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51, 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1979). Parasite populations and host community structure. In Host–Parasite Interfaces (ed. Nickol, B. B.). New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuperman, B. I. (1981). Tapeworms of the Genus Triaenophorus, Parasites of Fishes. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Mcgeorge, J., Valtonen, E. T. & Chubb, J. C. (1990). Studies on adult Schistocephalus (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from Phoca hispida (ringed seals) and plerocercoid larvae from Gasterosteus aculeatus (three-spined sticklebacks) from the Bothnian Bay, Finland. The British Society for Parasitology Spring Meeting 1990, Abstracts p. 18.Google Scholar
Miller, R. B. (1943). A review of the Triaenophorus problem in Canadian Lakes. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 95, 1–42.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (1979). A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction in parasites. American Naturalist 114, 648–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, J. (1989). The influence of Schistocephalus solidus and other helminth parasites on the anti-predator behaviour of the three-spined stickleback. The British, Netherlands and Belgian Societies for Parasitology with the Belgian Society of Protozoology, Joint Spring Meeting 1989, Abstract, 208.Google Scholar
Valtonen, E. T. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1990). Acanthocephala in fish from the Bothnian Bay, Finland. Journal of Zoology 220, 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valtonen, E. T., Rintamäki, P. & Lappalainen, M. (1989). Triaenophorus nodulosus and T. crassus in fish from northern Finland. Folia Parasitologica 36, 351–70.Google Scholar
Vik, R., Halvorsen, O. & Andersen, K. (1969). Observations on Diphyllobothrium plerocercoids in three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., from the River Elbe. Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 17, 75–80.Google Scholar
Von Bondsdorf, B. (1977). Diphyllobothriasis in Man. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & Mcleod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar