Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:30:24.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schistosoma mansoni: ability of Con A to protect in vitro mechanically transformed schistosomula against the lethal effect of immune serum plus complement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Thea A. van Pijkeren ,
C. A. P. Tavares  and
G. Gazzinelli
Thea A. van Pijkeren
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioquimica-Imunologia, Institute de Ciências Biológicas, UFMG
C. A. P. Tavares
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioquimica-Imunologia, Institute de Ciências Biológicas, UFMG
G. Gazzinelli
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, C.P. 1743, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Concanavalin A added to a defined culture medium renders schistosomula more resistant to the lethal effect of antibody plus complement. The Con A dose-dependent acquisition of protection reached a plateau at a concentration of 4 μg Con A/ml. α-Methylmannoside was not able to reverse the Con A-induced protection but excess methylmannoside, added to the incubation medium together with Con A partially prevented the effect of the lectin. Binding of anti-parasite antibody to the schistosomula surface did not change after pre-incubation with Con A. In the presence of puromycin (100 μg/ml) Con A is still able to confer protection. Incorporation of labelled amino acid into the tegumental proteins was not affected by Con A. Furthermore, a progressive reduction of protection was observed as the time of culture preceding Con A addition increased.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 239 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, J. L. & Seed, J. L. (1977). Characterization and isolation of Concanavalin A binding sites from the epidermis of S. mansoni. Journal of Parasitology 63, 250–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brink, L. H., McLaren, D. J. & Smithers, S. R. (1977). Schistosoma mansoni: a comparative study of artificially transformed schistosomula and schistosomula recovered after cercarial penetration of isolated skin. Parasitology 74, 73–86.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. A. (1965). In vitro cultivation of Schistosoma mansoni. Experimental Parasitology 16, 133–47.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. A. & Smithers, S. R. (1972). The effects of immune rhesus monkey serum on schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni during cultivation in vitro. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, J. A., Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R.J. (1971). Acquisition of human antigens by Schistosoma mansoni during cultivation in vitro. Nature, London 232, 653–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crabtree, J. E. & Wilson, R. A. (1980). Schistosoma mansoni: a scanning electron microscope study of the developing schistosomulum. Parasitology 81, 553–64.Google Scholar
Dean, D. A. (1977). Decreased binding of cytotoxic antibody by developing Schistosoma mansoni. Evidence for a surface change independent of host antigen adsorption and membrane turnover. Journal of Parasitology 63, 418–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, D. A. & Sell, K. W. (1972). Surface antigens on Schistosoma mansoni. II. Adsorption of a Forssman-like host-antigen by schistosomula. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 12, 525–40.Google Scholar
Dessein, A., Samuelson, J. C., Butterworth, A. E., Hogan, M., Sherry, B. A., Vadas, M. A. & David, J. R. (1981). Immune evasion by Schistosoma mansoni: loss of susceptibility to antibody or complement-dependent eosinophil attack by schistosomula cultured in medium free of macromolecules. Parasitology 82, 357–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzinelli, G., Oliveira, C. C., Figueiredo, E. A., Pereira, L. H., Coelho, P. M. Z. & Pellegrino, J. (1973). Schistosoma mansoni: biochemical evidence for morphogenetic change from cercariae to schistosomula. Experimental Parasitology 34, 181–8.Google Scholar
Goldring, O. L., Clegg, J. A., Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1976). Acquisition of human blood group antigens by Schistosoma mansoni. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 26, 181–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldring, O. L., Sher, A., Smithers, S. R. & McLaren, D. J. (1977). Host antigens and parasite antigens of murine Schistosoma mansoni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71, 144–8.Google Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin-phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, D. J., Clegg, J. A. & Smithers, S. R. (1975). Acquisition of host antigens by young Schistosoma mansoni in mice: correlation with failure to bind antibody in vitro. Parasitology 70, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, G., Wassom, D. L. & Sher, A. (1980). Studies of the antibody-dependent killing of schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni employing haptenic target antigens. Journal of Experimental Medicine 152, 41–53.Google Scholar
Murrell, K. D., Taylor, D. W., Vannier, W. E. & Dean, D. A. (1978). Schistosoma mansoni: analysis of surface membrane carbohydrates using lectins. Experimental Parasitology 46, 247–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagai, Y., Gazzinelli, G., Moraes, G. W. G. & Pellegrino, J. (1977). Protein synthesis during cercaria–schistosomulum transformation and early development of the Schistosoma mansoni larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 57B, 27–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Novato-Silva, E., Nogueira-Machado, J. A. & Gazzinelli, G. (1980). Schistosoma mansoni: comparison of the killing effect of granulocytes and complement with or without antibody on fresh and cultured schistosomula in vitro. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 29, 1263–7.Google Scholar
Samuelson, J. C., Sher, A. & Caulfield, J. P. (1980). Newly transformed schistosomula spontaneously lose surface antigens and C3 acceptor sites during culture. Journal of Immunology 124, 2055–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sher, A., Hall, B. F. & Vadas, M. A. (1978). Acquisition of murine major histocompatibility complex gene products by schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Experimental Medicine 148, 46–57.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. J. G. & Smithers, S. R. (1980). Characterization of the exposed carbohydrates on the surface membrane of adult Schistosoma mansoni by analysis of lectin binding. Parasitology 81, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tartof, D. (1980). Inhibition of cytotoxic T lymphocytes with Concanavalin A. Cellular Immunology 50, 48–57.Google Scholar
Tavares, C. A. P., Soares, R. C., Coelho, P. M. Z. & Gazzinelli, G. (1978). Schistosoma mansoni: evidence for a role of serum factors in protecting artificially transformed sehistosomula against antibody-mediated killing in vitro. Parasitology 77, 225–33.Google Scholar
Tavares, C. A. P., Cordeiro, M. N., Mota-Santos, T. A. & Gazzinelli, G. (1980). Artificially transformed sehistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni: mechanism of acquisition of protection against antibody-mediated killing. Parasitology 80, 95–104.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. & Barnes, P. E. (1977). The formation and turnover of the membranocalyx on the tegument of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 74, 61–71.Google Scholar
Yahara, I. & Edelman, G. M. (1973). The effects of Concanavalin A on the mobility of lymphocyte surface receptors. Experimental Cell Research 81, 143–55.Google Scholar