Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:02:57.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richness and diversity of intestinal metazoan communities in brown trout Salmo trutta compared to those of eels Anguilla anguilla in their European heartlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2000

C. R. KENNEDY
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
R. A. HARTVIGSEN
Affiliation:
Nina Niku, Headquarter, Tungasletta, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway

Abstract

The hypothesis that intestinal helminth communities in freshwater brown trout are dissimilar in composition and structure to those in the European eel was tested by an analysis of component communities from 72 localities and of infracommunities from 34 localities in the British Isles and Norway. Derived indices were then compared with published data from eels. Composition of helminth communities differed considerably between the two hosts as a group of 4 species occurred commonly in trout and so gave greater predictability to the community composition. These 4 species were trout specialists and in 97% of the localities a trout specialist dominated the community rather than a generalist acanthocephalan as is typical for eels. By contrast all measures of community structure and indices of richness and diversity indicated that helminth communities in trout were isolationist in character, species poor and exhibited low diversity at both component and infracommunity levels. All values of indices for trout helminth communities were strikingly similar to those obtained from eels. Evidence of interspecific interactions within the trout helminth communities and a limit of 4 to infracommunity species richness further enhanced the similarities and suggested a common determinant of community structure. The hypothesis was thus supported in respect of species composition but refuted in respect of community structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)