Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:17:42.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A retrospective study comparing agar plate culture, indirect immunofluorescence and real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2017

DORA BUONFRATE Open the ORCID record for DORA BUONFRATE [Opens in a new window] ,
FRANCESCA PERANDIN ,
FABIO FORMENTI  and
ZENO BISOFFI
DORA BUONFRATE*
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy
FRANCESCA PERANDIN
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy
FABIO FORMENTI
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy
ZENO BISOFFI
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy
*
*Corresponding author: Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Sempreboni 5, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasite that can cause death in immunocompromised people. A proper diagnosis is hence essential. The real-time polymerase-chain reaction (RT–PCR) is a novel, promising diagnostic method, that detects the DNA of the parasite in stool samples. In this retrospective study, we compared the sensitivity of agar plate coproculture (APC), an in-house immunofluorescence test (IFAT) and an in-house RT–PCR for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis infection. The study sample was composed by 223 samples. Samples resulting positive to APC, IFAT and RT–PCR were 20, 140 and 25, respectively. When sensitivity was calculated against a composite reference standard, serology confirmed the best performance (sensitivity 95%), followed by RT–PCR (57%) and APC (45%). In conclusion, in a non-endemic setting, serology is the best screening method, while the combination of APC and RT–PCR does not seem a reasonable approach to increase sensitivity. Both methods can have a role as confirmatory tests for selected cases.

Keywords

Strongyloides stercoralisstrongyloidiasisreal-time PCRagar plate cultureserology
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 144 , Issue 6 , May 2017 , pp. 812 - 816
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, N. W., Klein, D. M., Dornink, S. M., Jespersen, D. J., Kubofcik, J., Nutman, T. B., Merrigan, S. D., Couturier, M. R. and Theel, E. S. (2014). Comparison of three immunoassays for detection of antibodies to Strongyloides stercoralis . Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 21, 732–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, S. L., Piraisoody, N., Kramme, S., Marti, H., Silue, K. D., Panning, M., Nickel, B., Kern, W. V., Herrmann, M., Hatz, C. F., N'Goran, E. K., Utzinger, J. and von Muller, L. (2015). Real-time PCR for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in human stool samples from Cote d'Ivoire: diagnostic accuracy, inter-laboratory comparison and patterns of hookworm co-infection. Acta Tropica 150, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisoffi, Z., Buonfrate, D., Montresor, A., Requena-Mendez, A., Munoz, J., Krolewiecki, A. J., Gotuzzo, E., Mena, M. A., Chiodini, P. L., Anselmi, M., Moreira, J. and Albonico, M. (2013). Strongyloides stercoralis: a plea for action. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisoffi, Z., Buonfrate, D., Sequi, M., Mejia, R., Cimino, R. O., Krolewiecki, A. J., Albonico, M., Gobbo, M., Bonafini, S., Angheben, A., Requena-Mendez, A., Munoz, J. and Nutman, T. B. (2014). Diagnostic accuracy of five serologic tests for Strongyloides stercoralis infection. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8, e2640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boscolo, M., Gobbo, M., Mantovani, W., Degani, M., Anselmi, M., Monteiro, G. B., Marocco, S., Angheben, A., Mistretta, M., Santacatterina, M., Tais, S. and Bisoffi, Z. (2007). Evaluation of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for strongyloidiasis as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 14, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buonfrate, D., Formenti, F., Perandin, F. and Bisoffi, Z. (2015). Novel approaches to the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 21, 543–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campo Polanco, L., Gutierrez, L. A. and Cardona Arias, J. (2014). [Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection: meta-analysis on evaluation of conventional parasitological methods (1980–2013)]. Revista Espanola de Salud Publica 88, 581–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genta, R. M. (1989). Global prevalence of strongyloidiasis: critical review with epidemiologic insights into the prevention of disseminated disease. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 11, 755–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ines Ede, J., Souza, J. N., Santos, R. C., Souza, E. S., Santos, F. L., Silva, M. L., Silva, M. P., Teixeira, M. C. and Soares, N. M. (2011). Efficacy of parasitological methods for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm in faecal specimens. Acta Tropica 120, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, T., Montresor, A. and Savioli, L. (1996). Effectively controlling strongyloidiasis. Parasitology Today 12, 164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koga, K., Kasuya, S., Khamboonruang, C., Sukhavat, K., Ieda, M., Takatsuka, N., Kita, K. and Ohtomo, H. (1991). A modified agar plate method for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis . American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 45, 518–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mejia, R. and Nutman, T. B. (2012). Screening, prevention, and treatment for hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated infections caused by Strongyloides stercoralis . Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 25, 458–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panosian, K. J., Marone, P. and Edberg, S. C. (1986). Elucidation of Strongyloides stercoralis by bacterial-colony displacement. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 24, 86–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanathan, R., Burbelo, P. D., Groot, S., Iadarola, M. J., Neva, F. A. and Nutman, T. B. (2008). A luciferase immunoprecipitation systems assay enhances the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 198, 444–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repetto, S. A., Alba Soto, C. D., Cazorla, S. I., Tayeldin, M. L., Cuello, S., Lasala, M. B., Tekiel, V. S. and Gonzalez Cappa, S. M. (2013). An improved DNA isolation technique for PCR detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool samples. Acta Tropica 126, 110–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repetto, S. A., Ruybal, P., Solana, M. E., Lopez, C., Berini, C. A., Alba Soto, C. D. and Cappa, S. M. (2016). Comparison between PCR and larvae visualization methods for diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis out of endemic area: a proposed algorithm. Acta Tropica 157, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar, S. A., Gutierrez, C. and Berk, S. L. (1995). Value of the agar plate method for the diagnosis of intestinal strongyloidiasis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 23, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saugar, J. M., Merino, F. J., Martin-Rabadan, P., Fernandez-Soto, P., Ortega, S., Garate, T. and Rodriguez, E. (2015). Application of real-time PCR for the detection of Strongyloides spp. in clinical samples in a reference center in Spain. Acta Tropica 142, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schar, F., Odermatt, P., Khieu, V., Panning, M., Duong, S., Muth, S., Marti, H. and Kramme, S. (2013). Evaluation of real-time PCR for Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm as diagnostic tool in asymptomatic schoolchildren in Cambodia. Acta Tropica 126, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharifdini, M., Mirhendi, H., Ashrafi, K., Hosseini, M., Mohebali, M., Khodadadi, H. and Kia, E. B. (2015). Comparison of nested polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction with parasitological methods for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in human fecal samples. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 93, 1285–1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultana, Y., Jeoffreys, N., Watts, M. R., Gilbert, G. L. and Lee, R. (2013). Real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 88, 1048–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verweij, J. J., Canales, M., Polman, K., Ziem, J., Brienen, E. A., Polderman, A. M. and van Lieshout, L. (2009). Molecular diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in faecal samples using real-time PCR. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103, 342–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed