Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:08:04.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The respiratory horns of Psychoda pupae (Diptera: Psychodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. H. Satchell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Nottingham

Extract

1. The respiratory horn of Psychoda severini Tonn. subsp. parthenogenetica Tonn. is described. Within the tubular horn lies the felt chamber, which meets the horn wall at a number of thin circular regions, the pits, and communicates, through the annulated base of the horn, with the tracheal extension. This has a characteristic retiform thickening and is continuous, at the lower end, with the spiracular chamber, from which a trachea runs to the prothoracic spiracle of the imago.

2. At the upper end of the tracheal extension lies the closing mechanism consisting of a lever, and a muscle surrounded by a cuticular sheath. It is suggested that the mechanism functions by compressing the tracheal extension, and that the sheath serves to protect the muscle from the action of the moulting fluid.

3. The respiratory horns of fourteen of the British species of Psychoda are described, and it is shown that Ps. spreta Tonn., Ps. albipennis Zett. and Ps. trinodulosa Tonn. are like Ps. severini in possessing long lateral tubes in at least the basal half of the horn, whereas Ps. alternata Say, Ps. surcoufi Tonn., Ps. cinerea Banks, Ps. gemina Eaton, Ps. lobata Tonn., Ps. grisescens Tonn. and Ps. setigera Tonn. have only short lateral tubes. The two species Ps. phalaenoides L. subsp. elongata Tonn. and Ps. crassipenis Tonn. are alike in having a two-branched felt chamber, and Ps. brevicornis Tonn. has a flat triangular horn with a three-branched felt chamber and a cluster of air-containing tubes at each corner.

4. An account is given of the development of the respiratory horn of Ps. alternata Say. The horn arises as an outgrowth from the larval prothoracic imaginal disk, and the felt chamber forms by an invagination of its posterior wall. The tracheal extension arises as an invagination of the disk and subsequently acquires a connexion to the felt chamber.

5. The development is compared with that of Chaoborus plumicornis, and it is concluded that Weismann's theory of the origin of the horn from two distinct cell layers is not applicable to Psychoda.

6. The various terms that have been applied to the respiratory horn are discussed, and the conclusion is reached that though none of them is satisfactory, it is premature to devise a new scheme of nomenclature.

Grateful acknowledgements are due to Dr Ll. Lloyd for his help and advice in the course of this work. Some of the material was collected whilst the writer was in receipt of a grant from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, to whom acknowledgements are also due.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Espinasse, P. G. (1939). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. A, 109, 247.Google Scholar
Feuerborn, H. J. (1923). Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 1, 181.Google Scholar
Gäbler, H. (1935). Zool. Zbl. 55, 182.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de (1902). Zool. Jb. 15, 623.Google Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1934). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 116, 139.Google Scholar
Miall, L. C. & Hammond, A. R. (1900). Life history of the Harlequin Fly. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pulikovsky, N. (1927). Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 7, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satchell, G. H. (1947). Parasitology, 38, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, L. G. (1924). Parasitology, 16, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebold, C. T. E. von (1846). Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie, 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. (1935). Principles of Insect Morphology. New York and London.Google Scholar
Souza Lopes, H. de (1935). Rev. Ent., S. Paulo (Rio de J.), 5, 502.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. (1902). Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. p. 701.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A. (1923). Aust. Zool. 3, pt. 2, 56.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A. (1925). Ann. Biol. lacust. 13, 25.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A. L. (1940). Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 7, 21.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. H. (1900). Ill. Z. Ent. 5, 17.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1866). Z. wiss. Zool. 16, 45.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. & Gillett, J. D. (1936). Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 11, 104.Google Scholar