Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:55:50.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report on a Collection of Parasitic Nematodes, mainly from Egypt. Part IV. Trichostrongylidae and Strongylidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. L. Boulenger
C. L. Boulenger
Affiliation:
Professor of Zoology, Bedford College, University of London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present paper is a further instalment of the Reports on the Molteno Institute collection, of which Parts I–III, dealing with the Ascaridae, Heterakidae, Oxyuridae, Camallanidae, etc., were published in this Journal by Dr H. A. Baylis in 1923. The history of the collection has been dealt with by that writer, and the following report on the Trichostrongylidae and Strongylidae is presented in as nearly as possible the same form as that of the preceding parts, consisting of a list of determinations of the material, together with notes on the less well-known forms and full descriptions of the new species. As in Parts I–III, the numbers attached to each set of specimens are the serial numbers given to the original tubes at the Molteno Institute.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1926 , pp. 86 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, H. A. (1923). Report on a Collection of Parasitic Nematodes, mainly from Egypt. Parts I–III. Parasitology, XV. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, and Daubney, R. (1922). Report on the Parasitic Nematodes in the Collection of the Zoological Survey of India. Mem. Indian Mus. VII. 263–347.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1924). Helminths collected from Equines in Edinburgh and in London. Journ. Helminthology, II. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, H. G. (1920). Observations on the Nematode Genus Nematodirus, with Descriptions of New Species. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. LVIII. 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J. (1923). Observations on the Nematode Genera Kalicephalus, Diaphanocephalus, and Occipitodontus g.n., and on the Development of Kalicephalus philodryadus sp.n. Journ. Helminthology, I. 165–189.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1923). Le véritable Strongylus tetracanthus Mehlis et son rôle pathogène. Ann. de Parasitologie, I. 5–14.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1900). A Description of the Entozoa collected by Dr Willey during his sojourn in the Western Pacific. In Willey, Zool. Results, Cambridge, Pt. 5, 531–568.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. J. (1916). Nématodes des Oiseaux du Turkestan Russe. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. J. Sc. Petrograd, XX. 457–557.Google Scholar
Travassos, L. (1921). Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintolojica brasileiro. XIII. Ensaio monografico da familia Trichostrongylidae Leiper, 1909. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. XIII. 5–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar