Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:22:15.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reference List of the Trematode Parasites of British Freshwater Fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

William Nicoll
William Nicoll
Affiliation:
Medical Officer of Health, South Shields.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our freshwater fishes have for long been a subject of some economic interest and in consequence their diseases and their parasites have received quite a considerable amount of attention. Much has been written on the subject, even in this country, and it has formed the basis of not a little speculation and possibly some results of economic value. As usual, however, more attention has been devoted to the matter on the continent and in America. It is, nevertheless, gratifying to find that Mclntosh (1863) was one of the first to realise the important help to be derived from a scientific study of fish parasites in investigations on such problems as migration, etc. His work has been greatly amplified by the later researches of such men as Hofer (1904) and Zschokke (1884–1914) in Europe, and Ward (1908–11) in America, to mention only a few well-known names which have been prominent in this line of investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , March 1924 , pp. 127 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO LITERATURE

Askanazy, M. (1906). Weitere Mitteilungen über die Quelle der Infektion mit Distomum felineum. Königsberg Schr. physik. Gesellsch. xlvi, 127–31.Google Scholar
Baer, K. (1827). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der niederen Thiere. Nova Acta phys.-med. Acad. Nat. Curios. Bonn, xiii, 523–762, Pls. 28–33.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1861). Mémoire sur les vers intestinaux. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, ii, 1–376, Pls. 1–27.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van (1871). Les poissons des côtes de Belgique, leurs parasites et leurs commensaux. Mém. Acad. roy. de Sci. de Belg. xxxviii, 100 pp., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. van and Hesse, P. (1864). Recherches sur les Bdelloides (Hirudinées) et les Trématodes marins. Mém. Acad. roy. de Sci. de Belg. xxxiv, 1–148.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1891). Notices helminthologiques (deuxième série). Mém. soc. Zool. France, iv, 420–89, figs. 1–38.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1891). Bericht über die Fortschritte in der thierischen Parasitenkunde. Centratbl. f. Bakt. x, 421–30.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1892). “Vermes” in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnung des Thierreichs, iv, la, 561–816, Pls. 18–31.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1900). Die Arten der Gattung Clinostomum Leidy. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xiv, 1–48, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Bremser, J. G. (1824). Icones Helminthum systema Rudolphi entozoologicum illustrantes. 12 pp., 18 Pls.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. (1899). On Tetracotyle petromyzontis, a parasite of the brain of Ammocoetes. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci. n.s., xli, 489–98, Pl 39.Google Scholar
Ciurea, J. (1911). Eine europäische Clinostomum-Laxve. Centralbl.f. Bakt. lx, 354–8, 1 Pl.Google Scholar
Ciurea, J. (1915 a). Ueber einige neue Distomen aus dem Darm unserer Haustiere und des Pelikans, für welche die Fische als Infektionsquelle zu betrachten sind. Zeitschr. f. Infektionakrankh. der Haustiere, xvi, 445–58, Pl 1.Google Scholar
Ciurea, J. (1915 b). Weitere Versuehe über die Infektionsquelle der Menschen und der Tiere mit Leberdistomen aus der Familie Opisthorchiiden. Zeitschr. f. Infektionakrankh. der Haustiere xvii 209–14, Pl X.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. (1879). Parasites; a Treatise on the Entozoa of man and animals, including some account of the Ectozoa, 508 pp., 85 figs.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. R. (1915). Trematodes from Marine and Freshwater Fishes, etc. Trans. R. Soc. Canada, Ottawa, ix, Sect. 4, 181–206.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1835). Aspidogaster limacoides, eine neue Art Binnenwurm etc. Med. Jahrb. d. k. k. oesterreich. Staates, Wien, xvi (n.s. VII), 420–30, l PlGoogle Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1850). Systema helminthum, i, Vindobonae, 679 pp.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1855). Neunzehn Arten von Trematoden. Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wissenschaft, Wien, Math.-nat. Cl. x, 59–70, 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1858). Revision der Myzhelminthen. Abteilung Trematoden. Sitzungber. d. k. Akad. Wien, Math.-nat. Cl. xxxii, 207–390, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des Helminthes ou Vers intestinaux, Paris, 654 pp., 12 Pls.Google Scholar
Ercolani, G. B. (1881). Dell' addattamento della specie all' ambiente. Nuove ricerche sulla storia genetica dei Trematodi, Bologna, 98 pp., 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Eysenhardt, C. G. (1829). Einiges über Eingeweidewürmer. Verhandl. d. Berlin. Gesellsch. naturf. Fr. i, 144–52.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1918). The Anatomy of Tetracotyle iturbei Faust, with a Synopsis of Described Tetracotyliform Larvae. Journ. of Parasitology, v, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraipont, (1880). Recherches sur l'appareil excréteur des trématodes et des cestodes. Arch. de Biol. Gand, i, 415–56, Pls. 18–19.Google Scholar
Gamble, F. W. (1896). Platyhelminthes and Mesozoa. Cambridge Nat. Hist. ii, 1–96, 47 figs.Google Scholar
Gulliver, (1872). [Neuronaia lampetrae.] Abstract in Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc. xii, 103 and 425.Google Scholar
Hausmann, L. (1896). Ueber Trematoden der Süsswasserfische (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Centralbl. f. Bakt. xix, 389–92.Google Scholar
Hausmann, L. (1897). Centralbl. f. Bakt. Rev. suisse de Zool., Génève, v, 1–42, Pl I.Google Scholar
Heitz, A. (1918). Salmo salar Linn., seine Parasitenfauna und seine Ernährung im Meer und in Süsswasser. Arch, de Hydrobiol, Stuttgart, xii, 311–72, 485–561.Google Scholar
Hofer, B. (1904). Handbuch der Fischkrankheiten, Münich, 384 pp., 18 Pls.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. (1907). Internal Parasites and Diseased Conditions of Fishes. Trans. Biol. Soc. Liverpool, xxi, 170–203.Google Scholar
Kathariner, L. (1894). Die Gattung Gyrodactylus v. Nordm. Arb. a. d. zool.-zootom. Inst. Würzburg, Wiesbaden, x, 125–64.Google Scholar
Kathariner, L. (1904). Ueber die Entwicklung von Gyrodactylus elegans v. Nordm. Zool. Jahrb. Suppl. 7, Festschrift z. A. Weismann, 519–50.Google Scholar
Leuckart, F. S. (1828). Breves animalium quorundam maxima ex parte marinorum descriptiones, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Leuckart, F. S. (1842). Helminthologische Beiträge (Zool. Bruchstücke, III), 60 pp., 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1857). Bericht über die Leistungen in der Naturgeschichte der niederen Thiere während des Jahres 1856. Arch. f. Naturg. xxii. (2), 165–272.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G. M. R. (1881). Bidrag til Kundskab om Grønlands Trematod-fauna. Overs. o. d. k. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh. Copenhagen, xxiii, 52–84, Pls. 2–3.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1877). Enthehninthologica. Arch. f. Naturg. xliii, 173–98, Pls. 12–14.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1878). Neue Beobachtungen an Helminthen. Arch. f. Naturg. xliv, 218–45, Pls. 7–9.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1879). Helminthologische Studien. Arch. f. Naturg. xlv. 165–88, Pls. 11–12.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1880). Helminthologische Untersuchungen. Arch. f. Naturg. xlvi, 41–54, Pl 3.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1878–1889). Compendium der Helminthologie.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1882). Helminthologische Studien. Arch. f. Naturg. xlviii, 1–25, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1885). Beobachtungen an bekannten und neuen Nematoden und Trematoden. Arch. f. Naturg. li, 235–55, Pls. 13–15.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1890). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vogeltanien nebst Bemerkungen über neue und bekannte Helminthen. Arch. f. Naturg. lvi, 171–88, Pl X.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1894). Helminthologische Studien. Jenaiache Zeitschr. f. Naturw. xxviii (N.F. XXI), 328–42, Pls. 22–23.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1896). HelminthologischeMitteilungen. Arch. f. mikr. Anat, xlviii, 375–92, Pls. 16–17.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1898). Notes on Trematode Parasites of Fishes. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. xx, 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, E. (1905). Parasites of Fishes of Beaufort, North Carolina. Bull. Bureau Fish, xxiv, 321–428.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1885). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematoden. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. xli, 390–446, Pl 23.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1894). Die Distomen unserer Fische und Frösche. Bibliotheca zoologica, xvi, 1–296.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1896). Recherches sur la faune parasitaire de l'egypte. Première partie. Mém. de l'inst. Egypt, iii, 1–252, Pls. 1–16.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1899). Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematodenfauna Aegyptens. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xvi, 521–784.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1902 a). Die Distomen-Unterfamilie Haploporinae. Arch. de Parasitologie, vi, 129–43.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1902 b). Zur Kenntnis der Trematodenfauna des Triester Hafens. I. Ueber Monorchis Mont, und Haplasplanchnus n.g. Centralbl. f. Bakt. xxxii, 115–22.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1902 c). Ueber neue und bekannte Trematoden aus Seeschildkröten. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xvi, 411–894, Pls. 21–32.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1907). Beiträge zur Systematik der Distomen. Zur Kenntnis der Familie Hemiuridae. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xxvi, 63–180, Pls. 7–15.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1901). Ueber Hemiuriden. Zool. Anzeig. xxiv, 394–403, 473–88.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1909). Die Susswasserfauna Deutschlands. xvn. Parasitische Plattwürmer. 1. Trematodes.Google Scholar
MacCallum, W. G. (1895). On the Anatomy of two Distome parasites of freshwater fish. Vet. Mag. Philadelphia, ii, 401–12, figs. 1–8.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C. (1863). Notes on the Food and Parasites of Salmo salar. Journ. Linn. Soc. vii, 145–54.Google Scholar
Marshall, W. S. and Gilbert, N. C. (1905). Three new Trematodes found principally in Black Bass. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xxii, 477–88, Pl. 15.Google Scholar
Mataré, F. (1910). Ueber eine neue Tetracotyle im Hirn von Phoxinus laevis. Zeitschr. f. wissensch. Zool. xciv, 488–540, Pl. XVII.Google Scholar
Mazzarelli, G. (1906). L' attuale infizione da Tetracotyle percae fluviatilis Moul. dei Pesci persici del lago di Pusiano etc. Rivista mensile di Pesci, Milano, viii, 142–4.Google Scholar
Mola, P. (1912). Die Parasiten des Cottus gobio. Beitrag zu der helminthologischen Fauna der Teleostei. Centralbl. f. Bakt. lxv, 491–504, 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1892 a). Cotylogaster michaelis n.g., n. sp. e revisione degli Aspidobothridae. Festschr. z. 70.-Geburtstag R. Leuckart, Leipzig, pp. 168–214, Pls. 21–22.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1892 b). Studii sui trematodi endoparassiti. Monostomum cymbium Diesing. Contributo allo studio dei Monostomidi. Mem. r. Accad. d. sc. Torino; fis.-mat. e nat. class., 2 ser. xlii, 683–727, 1 Pl.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1892 c). Di alcuni organi di tatto nei Tristomidi. Contributo allo studio dei trematodi monogenetici. Parte 1. Boll. soc. nat. Napoli, v, 99–134, Pls. 5–6.Google Scholar
Moulinié, J. (1856). De la reproduction chez les Trématodes endoparasites. Mém. Inst. nat. genevois, Geneva, iii, 7–278, Pls. 4–9.Google Scholar
Mühling, P. (1898). Die Helminthenfauna der Wirbelthiere Ost-Preussens. Arch. f. Naturg. lxiv, 1–118, Pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W. (1909). Studies on the Structure and Classification of the Digenetic Trematodes. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. liii, 391–487.Google Scholar
Nordmann, A. Von (1832). Mikrographische Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der wirbellosen Thiere, Berlin, 2 parts, 118 and 150 pp., 20 Pls.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1901). Revision einiger Arten der Gattung Allocreadium. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. xiv, 483–520, Pl. 33.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1904, 1905). Die Trematoden des arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica, iv (2), 291–372, Pls. 2–4.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1911 a). Zum natürlichen System der digenen Trematoden, II–IV. Zool. Anzeig. xxxvii, 237–53, xxxviii, 97–117, 513–31.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1911 b). Sanguinicola M. Plehn—ein digenetischer Trematode! Zool. Anzeig. Leipzig, xxxvii, 33–45.Google Scholar
von Olfers, (1816). De vegetativis et animatis corporibus in corporibus animatis reperiundis commentarius, Berlin, 112 pp., 1 Pl.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1876). Bidrag till Skandinaviens Helminthfauna, I. K. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. Stockholm, xiv, Art. 1, 35 pp., 4 Pls.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1893). Bidrag till Skandinaviens Helminthfauna, II. K. Svensk. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. xxv, Art. 12, 41 pp., 5 Pls.Google Scholar
Plehn, M. (1908). Ein monozoischer Cestode als Blutparasite (Sanguinicola armata u. inermis Plehn). Zool. Anzeig. Leipzig, xxxiii, 427–40.Google Scholar
Pratt, H. S. (1900). Synopsis of North American Invertebrates, XII. The Trematodes. PartI. The Heterocotylea, American Naturalist, xxxiv, 645–62, figs. 1–50.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. (1808–1809). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, I–II, Amsteldamae.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlotthauber, (1860). Beiträge zur Helminthologie. Amtl. Ber. ü. d. 31 Versamml. deutsch. Naturf. und Aerzte, Göttingen (1854), pp. 121–33.Google Scholar
Srámek, A. (1901). Helminthen der an der zoologischen Station in Podiebrad (Böhmen) untersuchten Fische. Arch. d. naturw. Landesdurchforsch. v. Böhmen, II, 94–118, figs. 50–71.Google Scholar
Stafford, J. (1904). Trematodes from Canadian Fishes. Zool. Anzeiger, xxvii, 481–95.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A. (1894). A preliminary catalogue of the parasites contained in the collection of the United States Bureau of Animal Industry, etc. Vet. Mag. Philadelphia, i, 245–53, 331–54.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1886 a). Brani di Helminthologia tergestina. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. Trieste, ix, No. 2.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1886 b). I distomi dei pesci marini e d' acqua dolce. Programm. d. Ginn. comun. sup. Trieste, 66 pp.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, O. (1879 a). Beiträge zur Kenntniss ectoparasitischer mariner Trematoden. Abhandl. d. naturf. Gesellsch. zu Halle, xiv, 292–343, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, O. (1879 b). Zur Systematik der monogenetischen Trematoden. Zeitschr. ges. Naturwiss. Berlin, lii, 232–65.Google Scholar
Tosh, J. R. (1905). On the internal Parasites of the Tweed Salmon. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), xvi, 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villot, F. C. A. (1898). L'hémistome du Martin-Pecheur. C.R. Ass. franç. pour l'avanc. d. sc. Paris, xxvi, 538–42, fig. 1.Google Scholar
Wagener, G. R. (1857). Beiträge zur Entwicklungs-Geschichte der Eingeweidewürmer. Natuurk. Verhandel. Holland. Maatsch. Wetensch. Haarlem, 2 Versamml., 112 pp., Pls. 1–36.Google Scholar
Wagener, G. R. (1860). Ueber Gyrodactylus elegans V. Nordmann. Arch. f. Anat., Physiol. u. wissensch. Med. Leipzig, pp. 768–97, Pls. 17–18.Google Scholar
Waldenburg, L. (1860, 1862). Ueber Struktur und Ursprung der wurmhaltigen Cysten. Arch. f. path. Anat. Berlin, xxiv, 149–65, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1908 a). Some Points on the Migration of the Pacific Salmon as shown by its Parasites. Studies Zool. Lab., Univ. Nebraska, No. 92, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1908 b). Internal Parasites of the Sebago Salmon. Bull. Bur. Fisheries, Washington, xxviii, 1153–94, Pl CXXI.Google Scholar
Ward, H. B. (1911). The Distribution and Frequence of Animal Parasites and Parasitic Diseases in North American Freshwater Fishes. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc. pp. 207–41.Google Scholar
Wedl, C. (1857). Anatomische Beobachtungen über Trematoden. Sitzungsber. k. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-nat. Cl. xxvi, 241–78, Pls, 1–4.Google Scholar
Wegener, G. (1909). Die Ectoparasiten der Fische Ostpreussens. Königsberg Schr. physik. Ges. l, 195–286, Pls. VI–VII.Google Scholar
Yokogawa, S. (1913). Ueber einen neuen Parasiten Metagonimus yokogawai, der die Forellenart Plecoglossus altivelis (Temminck) zum Zwischenwirt hat. Bildung einer neuen Gattung. Centralbl. f. Bakt. i, lxxii, 158–79, 3 Pls.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H. (1800). Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeiveidewürmer, etc. Leipzig, 320 pp., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1872). Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung des Diplozoon paradoxum. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool. xxii, 168–80, Pl 12.Google Scholar
Ziegler, H. E. (1883). Bucephalus und Gasterostomum. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool. xxxix, 537–71, Pls. 32–33.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F. (1884). Recherches sur l'organisation et la distribution zoologique des vers parasites des poissons d'eau douce. Arch. de Biol. Gand, v, 153–241, Pls. 9–10.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F. (1896). Zur Faunistik der parasitischen Würmer von Süsswasserfischen. Centralbl. f. Bakt. xix, 772–84, 815–25.Google Scholar
Zschokke, F. and Heitz, A. (1914). Entoparasiten aus Salmoniden von Kamtschatka. Rev. suisse de Zool. xxii, 195–256, Pl 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar