Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T19:41:38.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reference List of the Trematode Parasites of British Amphibia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

William Nicoll
William Nicoll
Affiliation:
London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In spite of the fact that frogs form a common subject of biological examination and experiment it is curious that, in this country, there have been few reports on the helminth parasites with which they are so frequently infected. We owe practically all our knowledge of the Trematode parasites of amphibians to continental zoologists. The early researches of von Frölich (1789–1802) and Rudolphi (1809) followed, a hundred years later, by those of von Linstow (1877–1890) and Looss (1894–1901), are responsible for the greater part of the existing information. Amongst others who have devoted some attention to the subject may be mentioned the names of Dujardin (1845), Diesing (1836–1858), Gastaldi (1854) and Olsson (1876).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1926 , pp. 14 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaizot, L. (1910). Un nouveau Trèinatode (Cephalogonimus europaeus) parasite intestinal de Rana esculenta L. Bull. Soc. Zool. Paris, XXXV. 34–8.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1892). Vermes in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs, IV. i a. 561–816.Google Scholar
Braun, M. (1893). Vermes in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs 817–925.Google Scholar
Cobbold, T. S. (1860). Synopsis of the Distomidae. Journ. Proc. Linn. Soc. Zool. (17), V. 1–56.Google Scholar
Cohn, L. (1904). Helminthologische Mitteilungen II. Arch. f. Naturg. 1904, i. 232.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1836). Monographic der Gattungen Amphistoma und Diflodisous. Ann. Wien. Mus. Naturg. I. 235–60. Pls. 22–4.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1850). Systema Helminthum I.Google Scholar
Diesing, C. M. (1858). Berichtigungen und Zusätze zur Revision der Cercariaen. Sitzungsber. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Cl. XXXI. 239–90, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturdle des Helminthes on Vers intestinaux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ercolani, G. (1882). Dell' adattamento della specie all' ambiente. Nuovi ricerche sulla storia genetica dei Trematodi. Mem. Accad. Sc. Ist'. Bologna (4), II. 239–334.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1918). The Anatomy of Tetracotyle iturbei Faust, with a synopsis of described Tetracotyliform larvae. Parasitology, V. 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Filippi, F. (1854). Méinoire pour servir à l'Mstoire génétique des Trématodes. Ann. Sc. Nat. Paris, Zool. (4), II. 255–84, Pls. 10–11.Google Scholar
Fraipont, J. (1880). Recherches sur l'appareil excréteur des Trématodes et des Cestodes. Arch, de Biol. Gand, I. 416–56, Pls. 18–19.Google Scholar
Gastaldi, B. (1854). Cenni sopra alcuni nuovi elminti della Rana esculenta, con nuove osservazione sui Codonocephalus mutabilis Diesing. Turin, 14 pp. 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. (1902). Bemerkungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Polystomum integerrimum Rud. Zeitschr. f. wissenschaftl. Zool. LXXII. 180–9.Google Scholar
Kampmann, K. (1894). Ueber das Vorkommen von Klappenapparaten in den Excretionsorganen der Trematoden. Rev. suisse Zool. II. 443–62, Pls. 19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopcynski, (1907). Ueber den Bau von Codonocephalus mutabilis Dies. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XXIV. 625–54.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1877). Enthelminthologica. Arch. f. Naturg. XLIII. 173–98, Pls. 12–14.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1884). Helminthologisches. Arch. f. Naturg. L. 125–45, Pls. 7–10.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1887). Helminthologische Untersuchungen. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. III. 97–114, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Von Linstow, O. (1890). Ueber den Bau und Entwicklung der Distomum cylindraceum Zed. Arch. mikr. Anat. XXXVI. 173–91, Pls. 7–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looss, A. (1894). Die Distomen unserer Fische und Frösche. Bibliotheca zool. Stuttgart, XVI. 296 pp. 9 Pls.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1896). Recherches sur la faune parasitaire de l'lÉgypte, ler Partie. Mém. Inst. Égypt. III. 1–252.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1898). Quelques observations à propos de la note—Forme nuovede entozoa d' Egitto de M. le docteur Sonsino. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk. XXIII. 453–61.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1899). Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Trematodenfauna Aegyptens. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XII. 521–784, Pls. 24–32.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1902). Ueber neue und bekannte Trematoden aus Seeschildkröten. Zool. Jahrb., Syst. XIII. 411–894, Pls. 21–32.Google Scholar
Looss, A. (1907). Ueber einige zum Teil neue Distomen der europäischen Fauna. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. u. Parasitenk. XLIII. 604–13.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1909). Trematodes in Brauer, Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands. Jena; Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1859). Nuovi myzhelminthi raccolti ed esaminati. Sitzungsber. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl. XXXVII. 818–54, Pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1861). Prodromus faunae helminthologicae venetae. Denkschr. k. Akad. Wissenschaft. Wien, Math.-naturw. Kl. XIX. 189–338, Pls. 1–15.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1910). Nordostafrikanische Trematoden, I Fascioliden. Results Swedish Zool. Exped. Egypt and White Nile, IV. No. 23 A, 1–160, Pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Olsson, P. (1876). Bidrag til Skandinaviens Helminthfauna I. K. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. XIV. 35 pp., 4 Pls.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1857). Trematodenlarven und Trematoden. Helminthologische Beiträge (Heidelberg), I. 56 pp., 6 Pls.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1894). L' elmintologia italiana da primi tempi all' anno 1890. Atti B. Univ. Genova, XIII. 733 pp.Google Scholar
Perroncito, E. (1878). Cercaria senza coda incistidata nel fegatodi una Rana (R. esculenta). Ann. R. Accad. Agric. Torino, XXI. 7–9,1 Pl [Also in Veterinarian, LIII. (1880), 454–6.]Google Scholar
Rizzo, A. (1902). La fauna elmintologica dei rettili nella provincia di Catania. Arch, de Parasitol. VI. 26–41, figs. 11–12.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, K. (1809). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, II. 451 pp.Google Scholar
Sousino, P. (1893). Nota intorno al Distomwn horridum Leidy e al Dislomum ovocaudatum Vulpian. Atti soc. Tosc. di sc, nat., Pisa; proc.-verb. VIII. 315–17.Google Scholar
Ssinitzin, D. F. (1905). Materialy po estestvennoi istorii trematod. Distomy ryb i Uaguahek okrestnostei Varshavy, Warsaw, 210 pp.Google Scholar
Stieda, L. (1871). Ueber den Bau des Polystomum integerrimum. Arch. f. Anal., Physiol. und wissenschaftl. Med., Leipzig (5), 660–78, Pl 15.Google Scholar
Stiles, and Hassall, (1902). Notes on Parasites, 58–62. Bureau Anim. Ind., U.S. Dept. Agrie. (Bull. 35), 19–34.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1889). I Distomi degli Anfibi. Boll. Soc. Adriat. sc. nat. Trieste, XI. 60–74.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1904). Alcuni Distomi della collezione elmintologica del Museo Zoologico di Napoli. Annuar. Mus. Univ. Napoli, N.S. No. 23.Google Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1917). Studies on North American Polystomidae, Aspidogastridae and Paramphistomidae. Illinois Biol. Monogr. III. 114 pp. 11 Pls.Google Scholar
Wagener, G. R. (1857). Beitráge zur Entwicklungsgeschiohte der Eingeweidewünner. Natuurk. Verhandel. Holland Martsch Wetensch. Haarlem, 2 versamml. 112 pp.Google Scholar
Wedl, C. (1849). Ueber Filariencysten beim Frosche und die gleichzeitig vorkommenden Haematozoen. Berichte u. d. Mittheil. v. Freunde der Natunvissenschaft in Wien, II 272–7.Google Scholar
Willem, V. (1906). Deux Trématodes nouveaux pour la faune beige. Bull. Acad. ray. Bruxelles, 1906, pp. 522–3 and 599–612.Google Scholar
Wundsch, H. H. (1911). Pneunumoeces asper Looss und sein Verhältniss zu den Gattungsverwandten. Dissert. Berlin (G. Bernstein), 1911, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. G. H. (1800). Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgeschichte der Eingeweidewürmer, pp. 320, 6 Pls. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1872). Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung und den Bau des Polystomum integerrimum. Zeitschr. f. wissensch. Zool. XXII. 1–24, Pls. 1–2.Google Scholar