Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:17:03.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A reappraisal of the taxonomic status of Eimeria mivati Edgar and Seibold 1964, by enzyme electrophoresis and cross-immunity tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. W. Shirley
M. W. Shirley
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs PE17 2DA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An examination of 2 strains of Eimeria acervulina var. mivati (since 1973 E. mivati has been regarded as a variant of E. acervulina) showed that previous confusion over the taxonomic status of E. mivati arose because the investigations were done using laboratory cultures of E. mivati which were contaminated with E. acervulina.

Electrophoretic analyses of enzymes, host specificity and cross-immunity tests have revealed that:

(1) The 1971 Houghton strain of E. acervulina var. mivati was a mixture of 2 parasites. (a) Passage of this strain in embryonating eggs resulted in a selection against that parasite previously characterized as E. acervulina. (b) The parasite which did reproduce in eggs did not immunize chickens against subsequent challenge with E. acervulina. This parasite is most likely E. mivati. (c) E. mivati recovered from eggs did, however, immunize chickens against challenge with a new field strain which was morphologically identical to E. mivati and characterized by the same electrophoretic forms of 2 enzymes.

(2) A strain of E. acervulina var. mivati from the USA was also a mixture of E. acervulina and E. mivati.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 221 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carter, R. (1973). Enzyme variation in Plasmodium berghei and Plasmodium vinckei. Parasitology 66, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, D. M. & Timms, J. R. (1972). The rearing and maintenance of breeding chickens in isolators. I. Glassfibre isolators. Avian Pathology 1, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, S. A. & Seibold, C. T. (1964). A new coccidium of chickens, Eimeria mivati sp.n (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) with details of its life history. Journal of Parasitology 50, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1973). Eimeria diminuta sp.n from the Ceylon jungle fowl, Gallus lafayettei. Journal of Protozoology 20, 357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton-Smith, C. & Long, P. L. (1959). The effect of different anticoccidial agents on the intestinal coccidioses of the fowl. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 69, 192–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J. & Reid, W. M. (1971). Pathogenicity of Eimeria mivati in light and heavy coccidial infections. Poultry Science 50, 1202–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. (1958). Experimental Eimeria mitis infections in chickens. Parasitology 48, 101–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. (1969). Immunological variation between two strains of Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 59, 725–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P., Canning, E. U., Long, P. L., Rollinson, D. & Williams, R. B. (1978). A suggested terminology for populations of coccidia (Eimeriorina) particularly of the genus Eimeria (Protozoa: Apicomplexa). Parasitology 77, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Long, P. L. (1974). The specific characters of the Eimeria with special reference to the coccidia of the fowl. Avian Pathology 3, 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1972). The development of Eimeria acervulina in the caeca of young fowls. Parasitology 64, 479–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1966). The growth of some species of Eimeria in avian embryos. Parasitology 56, 575–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1967). Studies on Eimeria mivati in chickens and a comparison with Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Comparative Pathology 77, 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. (1972). Eimeria mivati: reproduction, pathogenicity and immunogenicity of a strain maintained in chick embryos by serial passage. Journal of Comparative Pathology 82, 439–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1973). Studies on the relationship between Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria mivati. Parasitology 67, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1974). Experimental infection of chickens with two species of Eimeria isolated from the Malaysian Jungle Fowl. Parasitology 69, 337–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L., Joyner, L. P., Millard, B. J. & Norton, C. C. (1976). A guide to laboratory techniques used in the study and diagnosis of avian coccidiosis. Folia Veterinaria Latina 6, 201–17.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. & Millard, B. J. (1973). Eimeria infection of chicken embryos: the effect of known anticoccidial drugs against E. tenella and E. mivati. Avian Pathology 2, 111–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Millard, B. J. (1977). Eimeria: immunisation of young chickens kept in litter pens. Avian Pathology 6, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). Counting oocysts of chicken coccidia. Laboratory Practice 7, 515–19.Google Scholar
Long, P. L. & Tanielian, Z. (1965). The isolation of Eimeria mivati in Lebanon during the course of a survey of Eimeria spp. in chickens. ‘Magon’ Institut de recherches agronomiques, Scientific Series No. 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D. (1975). Electrophoretic variation of enzymes in chicken coccidia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 69, 436–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Rollinson, D. (1976). Electrophoretic variation of enzymes in mammalian coccidia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 21–22.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. & Betts, M. J. (1973). Chemotherapy of chicken coccidiosis. Advances in Pharmacology and Chemotherapy 11, 221–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. (1975). Enzyme variation in Eimeria species of the chicken. Parasitology 71, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. (1978). Electrophoretic variation of enzymes: a further marker for genetic studies of the Eimeria. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 57, 83–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. & Millard, B. J. (1976). Some observations on the sexual differentiation of Eimeria tenella using single sporozoite infections in chicken embryos. Parasitology 73, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W., Millard, B. J. & Long, P. L. (1977). Studies on the growth, chemotherapy and enzyme variation of Eimeria acervulina var. diminuta and E. acervulina var. mivati. Parasitology 75, 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. American Journal of Hygiene 10, 269–383.Google Scholar
Vetterling, J. M. & Doran, D. J. (1966). Schizogony and gametogony in the life cycle of the poultry coccidium Eimeria acervulina Tyzzer 1929. Journal of Parasitology 52, 1150–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed