Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:54:41.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pseudechinoparyphium echinatum (Digenea: Echinostomatidae): experimental observations on cercarial specificity toward second intermediate hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. M. McCarthy  and
I. Kanev
A. M. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Division of Biosphere Sciences, King's College London, University of London, London W8 7AH, U.K.
I. Kanev
Affiliation:
Central Laboratory of Helminthology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Blok 25, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Infectivity of Pseudechinoparyphium echinatum cercariae to 11 species of gastropod was examined experimentally. Broad specificity and differential host—parasite compatibility were exhibited. Nine gastropod species functioned as second intermediate hosts. Planorbarius corneus, Physa fontinalis, Lymnaea peregra and Biomphalaria alexandrina showed high levels of compatibility with the parasite. In single-species exposures over 90% of cercariae encysted in each of these hosts. Low compatibility with the first intermediate host species Lymnaea stagnalis may be a mechanism preventing super-infection of emitting snails. Cercariae did not infect the prosobranchs Bithynia tentaculata and Viviparus viviparus. Experimental infection of a host community comprised of 8 European gastropod species revealed an order of host utilization similar to that shown in single-species exposures. However, cercarial transmission success in P. fontinalis and L. peregra (compared to that in P. corneus) was significantly reduced. This may have been due to the marked preference to cercariae for P. corneus compared to the other two highly suitable hosts for whom cercariae showed equal preference.

Keywords

Pseudechinoparyphium echinatumechinostomecercariaehost specificitysecond intermediate hostshost utilization
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 100 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 423 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. W. & Fried, B. (1987). Experimental infection of Physa heterostropha, Helisoma trivolvis, and Biomphalaria glabrata (Gastropoda) with Echinostoma revolutum (Trematoda) cercariae. Journal of Parasitology 73, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, T. C., Shuster, C. N. & Anderson, A. H. (1966). A comparative study of the susceptibility and response of eight species of marine pelycypods to the trematode Himasthia quissetensis. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 85, 284–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. Ø. (1980). A review of the influence of host- and parasite-related factors and environmental conditions on the host-finding capacity of the trematode miracidium. Acta Tropica 37, 303–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Christensen, N. Ø., Fried, B. & Kanev, I. (1989). Taxonomy of the 37 collar-spined Echinostoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) in studies on population regulation in experimental rodent hosts. Angewandte Parasitologie (in the Press).Google Scholar
Combes, C. & MonÉe, H. (1987). Possible mechanisms of the decoy effect in Schistosorna mansoni transmission. International Journal for Parasitology 17, 971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. A. & Gordon, D. M. (1983 a). Experimental studies on infection dynamics of the cercariae of Echinoparyphiurn recurvatum (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Parasitology 87, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. A. & Gordon, D. M. (1983 b). Experimental observations on the specificity of Echinoparyphium recurvatum toward second intermediate hosts. Zeitschrjft für Parasitenkunde 69, 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. A., Whitfield, P. J. & Dobson, A. P. (1981). Parasite utilization of a host community: the distribution and occurrence of metacercarial cysts of Echinoparyphiurn recurvatum (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) in seven species of mollusc at Harting Pond, Sussex. Parasitology 83, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, B. & Fujino, T. (1987). Argentophilic and scanning electron microscope observations of the tegumentary papillae of Echinostoma revoluturn (Trematoda) cercariae. Journal of Parasitology 73, 1169–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, B. & King, B. W. (1989). Attraction of Echinostonia revolutum cercariae to Biomphalaria glabrata dialysate. Journal of Parasitology 75, 55–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanev, I. (1982). Comparative studies on the morphology and biology of Echinostoma nudicaudatum Nasir 1960, Cercaria deficipinnatum Khan 1960 and Echinoparyphiurn aconiatum Dietz 1909 (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae). Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Helminthology 14, 29–43.Google Scholar
Kanev, I. & Vassilev, I. (1986). On the identity of Echinoparyphium aconiatum Dietz 1909 (= Pseudechino paryphium echinatum G. and Sp. Nov. Comb.) Proceedings of the 4th Helminthological Symposium, The High Tartras, Czechoslovakia, p.4.Google Scholar
Kemp, W. M. & Devine, D. D. (1982). Behavioural cues in trematode life cycles. In Cues that Influence Behavior of Internal Parasites (ed. Bailey, W. S.), pp. 67–84. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Macan, T. T. (1977). A key to the British fresh- and brackish-water gastropods. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publications, No. 13.Google Scholar
Motzel, W. & Haas, W. (1985). Studies on the attachment response of Isthmiophora melis cercariae (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 71, 519–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulmer, M. J. (1971). Site-finding behavior in helminths in intermediate and definitive hosts. In Ecology and Physiology of Parasites (ed. Fallis, A. M.), pp. 123–159. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilev, I. & Kambourov, P. (1972). Studies on the ecology of echinostomatids found in domestic fowl in Bulgaria. Bulletin of The Central Laboratory of Helminthology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 15, 33–48.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. (1959). Host location by trematode miracidia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 53, 288–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ŽĎÁrskÁ, Z., NaŠincovÁ, V., ŠTěrba, J. & ValkounovÁ, J. (1987). Ultrastructure of a new type of sensory ending in Echinostorna revolutum cercaria (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae). Folia Parasitologica 34, 311–15.Google ScholarPubMed