The complexity of the life-cycle of many parasitic helminths has driven the evolution of several well-documented adaptations serving to facilitate the completion of each difficult step in the cycle. In some trematode taxa, selection has even favoured the truncation of the life-cycle: progenetic larval stages (metacercariae) are capable of producing eggs inside their usual intermediate hosts, eliminating the need to be transmitted by predation to a definitive host. In some species, progenesis is shown by all individuals, whereas in other species both the normal and truncated life-cycles coexist in the same populations. Here, the strategies chosen by normal and progenetic metacercariae of the trematode Coitocaecum parvum are investigated and compared. Normal metacercariae, i.e. metacercariae that only develop into adults following ingestion by a suitable fish definitive host, were not capable of manipulating the behaviour of their amphipod intermediate host in ways that could facilitate their capture by fish. These metacercariae were associated with increased mortality in amphipods. Progenetic metacercariae, on the other hand, showed lower virulence levels than normal metacercariae. At the time of their death, amphipods harbouring progenetic metacercariae contained close to the maximum number of eggs that can be produced by progenetic metacercariae, suggesting that the parasite lowers its virulence to keep its host alive long enough to maximize egg output. The maintenance of the 2 strategies in the C. parvum population suggests that they may have equal fitness payoffs: progenesis and low virulence guarantee the production of at least some eggs, whereas the normal life-cycle and its associated higher virulence in the intermediate host provides a low probability of much higher fecundity.