Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:03:24.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prevalence and pathology of Schistosoma nasale Rao, 1933 in cattle in Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. De Bont ,
D. Van Aken ,
J. Vercruysse ,
J. Fransen ,
V. R. Southgate  and
D. Rollinson
J. De Bont
Affiliation:
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
D. Van Aken
Affiliation:
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
J. Vercruysse
Affiliation:
2Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Casinoplein 24, 9000, Gent, Belgium
J. Fransen
Affiliation:
3Department of Histology, Janssen Pharmaceutica, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
V. R. Southgate
Affiliation:
4Department of Zoology, British Museum, Natural History, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD
D. Rollinson
Affiliation:
4Department of Zoology, British Museum, Natural History, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During 1987 a total of 1393 cattle was examined for Schistosoma nasale infection at the Kandy slaughterhouse, Sri Lanka. The overall prevalence was 12·6% (monthly range 3–17%). Based on the appearance of macroscopic lesions, 6 types (0–5) were recognized; type 5 being the most severe, with cauliflower-like growths obstructing the nasal cavity. Older bovines with 8 permanent incisors were more heavily infected (29·%) than younger ones with no permanent incisors (6·0%). The severity of the lesions increased also with the age of the animals. Observations on the localization of the lesions showed that the first sessile nodular areas appear on the medial septum, on the dorsal edge of the ventral nasal concha and on the lateral wall of the middle meatus of the nasal cavity. Later, they gradually spread over the whole mucosal surface of the anterior part of the cavity but were rarely found further than 10 cm posterior to the nasal opening. The histopathology showed that granuloma formation due to the presence of eggs was the most common feature of the respiratory mucosa.

Keywords

Schistosoma nasalehistopathologyprevalenceinflammatory lesions
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 197 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achuthan, H. N. & Alwar, V. S. (1973). A note on the occurrence of nasal schistosomiasis in sheep and goats in Tamil Nadu (correspondence) Indian Veterinary Journal 50, 1058–9.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1935). Report of the Government Veterinary Surgeon. Ceylon Administrative Reports, 1934, 4, H6–H7.Google Scholar
Datta, S. C. A. (1932). The etiology of bovine nasal granuloma. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 2, 131–40.Google Scholar
Dutt, S. C. (1967). Studies on Schistosoma nasale Rao,1933. I. Morphology of the adults, egg and larval stages. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 37, 249–62.Google Scholar
Dutt, S. C. & Srivastava, H. D. (1968). Studies on Schistosoma nasale Rao, 1933. II. Molluscan and mammalian hosts of the blood-fluke. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science, 38, 210–16.Google Scholar
Islam, K. S. (1975). Schistosomiasis in domestic ruminants in Bangladesh. Tropical Animal Health and Production 7, 244.Google Scholar
Kumar, V. & De Burbure, G. (1986). Schistosomes of animals and man in Asia. Helminthological Abstracts (Series A) 55, 469–80.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, P. (1946). A case of bovine nasal schistosomiasis. Tropical Agriculturist 102, 101–2.Google Scholar
Malkani, P. G. (1932). Etiology of nasal granuloma. Veterinary Record 12, 416.Google Scholar
Muraleedharan, K., Kumar, S. P., Hedge, K. S. & Alwar, V. S. (1973). Incidence of Schistosoma nasale Rao, 1933 infection in sheep. Indian Veterinary Journal 50, 1056–7.Google Scholar
Muraleedharan, K., Kumar, S. P., Alwar, V. S. & Hedge, K. S. (1976 a). A note on the intermediate host of Schistosoma nasale Rao, 1933 and on the seasonal prevalence of its cercaria. Indian Veterinary Journal 53, 819–20.Google Scholar
Muraleedharan, K., Kumar, S. P., Hedge, K. S. & Alwar, V. S. (1976 b). Studies on the epizootiology of nasal schistosomiasis of bovines. 1. Prevalence and incidence of infection. Mysore Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10, 105–17.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. (1933 a). Bovine nasal Schistosomiasis in the Madras Presidency with a description of the parasite. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 3, 29–38.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. (1933 b). A preliminary report on the successful infection with nasal schistosomiasis in experimental calves. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 3, 160–2.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. (1934). A comparative study of Schistosoma spindalis Montgomery, 1906 and Schistosoma nasalis n.sp. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 4, 1–28.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. (1935). Further observations on bovine nasal schistosomiasis. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 5, 266–73.Google Scholar
Starmuhlner, F. (1984). Mountain stream fauna with special reference to the mollusca. In (ed. Fernando, C. H.) Ecology and Biogeography in Sri Lanka. Monographiae biologicae 57, 215–55. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Lichtenberg, F., Smith, J. H. & Cheever, A. W. (1966). The Hoeppli phenomenon in schistosomiasis. Comparative pathology and immunopathology. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 15, 886–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed