Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:04:47.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preclinical evaluation of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a recombinant chimeric protein vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

Daniela P. Lage
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Danniele L. Vale
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Fabiana A. G. Maia
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Vívian T. Martins
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Marcela G. P. Silva
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Nathalia C. Galvani
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Mariana M. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Gabriel J. L. Moreira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Imunopatologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Insituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Eduarda M. Sombrio
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Camila S. Freitas
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Breno L. Pimenta
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Karolina O. M. Falcão
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patologia Clínica, COLTEC, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Saulo S. G. Dias
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patologia Clínica, COLTEC, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Raquel S. Bandeira
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Isabela A. G. Pereira
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Grasiele S. V. Tavares
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Antônio L. Teixeira
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
Miguel A. Chávez-Fumagalli
Affiliation:
Computational Biology and Chemistry Research Group, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Urb. San José S/N, Umacollo, Arequipa, Peru
Bruno M. Roatt
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Imunopatologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Insituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Ricardo A. Machado-de-Ávila
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Eduardo A. F. Coelho*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciúma, Santa Catarina, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Eduardo A. F. Coelho; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a tropical disease that can be fatal if acute and untreated. Diagnosis is difficult, the treatment is toxic and prophylactic vaccines do not exist. Leishmania parasites express hundreds of proteins and several of them are relevant for the host's immune system. In this context, in the present study, 10 specific T-cell epitopes from 5 parasite proteins, which were identified by antibodies in VL patients’ sera, were selected and used to construct a gene codifying the new chimeric protein called rCHI. The rCHI vaccine was developed and thoroughly evaluated for its potential effectiveness against Leishmania infantum infection. We used monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and polymeric micelles (Mic) as adjuvant and/or delivery system. The results demonstrated that both rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic significantly stimulate an antileishmanial Th1-type cellular response, with higher production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12 and nitrite in vaccinated animals, and this response was sustained after challenge. In addition, these mice significantly reduced the parasitism in internal organs and increased the production of IgG2a isotype antibodies. In vivo and in vitro toxicity showed that rCHI is safe for the mammalians, and the recombinant protein also induced in vitro lymphoproliferative response and production of Th1-type cytokines by human cells, which were collected from healthy subjects and treated VL patients. These data suggest rCHI plus MPLA or micelles could be considered as a vaccine candidate against VL.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Leishmaniases are parasitic diseases responsible for causing a broad clinical spectrum in patients, with the main forms being known as tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). These diseases are endemic in 98 countries and territories around the world. Approximately 1 billion people live in endemic areas, and it is estimated that 1 million new cases of TL and 30 000 new cases of VL occur annually (WHO, 2024). VL is the most severe form of leishmaniasis, which can be fatal if acute and untreated, and is caused by Leishmania donovani and L. infantum species. The development of active disease depends on the factors such as the immune status and nutritional condition of the patients, and virulence of infective parasite strain (Burza et al., Reference Burza, Croft and Boelaert2018; Montaner-Angoiti and Llobat, Reference Montaner-Angoiti and Llobat2023).

Public health measures to prevent VL are mainly based on vector control, patient detection and treatment and reservoir elimination (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Tanner, Runk and Hoyos2024). However, drugs used for the VL treatment present limitations, such as organic toxicity, high cost and the development of resistant strains (Akbari et al., Reference Akbari, Oryan and Hatam2021). Control of vector-borne diseases is challenging due to the erratic nature of these insects (Balaska et al., Reference Balaska, Fotakis, Chaskopoulou and Vontas2021), and the diagnosis of disease is hampered by varying sensitivity and specificity of laboratorial tests (Erber et al., Reference Erber, Sandler, Avelar, Swoboda, Cota and Walochnik2022). Considering the impact of the disease on public health and the need to develop more effective control strategies, the development of vaccines could be a promising approach, since they can induce a lasting effect, and be administered with prophylactic and therapeutic purposes in patients (Kumari et al., Reference Kumari, Mamud and Jha2023). Although attempts have been made to obtain effective vaccine candidates to protect against VL (He et al., Reference He, Huang, Zhang, Chen, Chen, Zhang, Li, Zheng, Chen and Chen2019; Emerick et al., Reference Emerick, Carvalho, Miranda, Carneiro-da-Silva, Martins, Oliveira and Marques-da-Silva2021; Yadav et al., Reference Yadav, Prakash, Singh, Gedda, Chauhan, Sundar and Dubey2021; Kushwaha and Capalash, Reference Kushwaha and Capalash2023; Ojha et al., Reference Ojha, Chand, Vellingiri and Prajapati2023), few canine vaccines are available and present contradictory results due to distinct factors; and a human vaccine does not exist (Srivastava et al., Reference Srivastava, Shankar, Mishra and Singh2016; Le Rutte et al., Reference Le Rutte, Coffeng, Malvolti, Kaye and Vlas2020).

In the last decades, several Leishmania antigens were evaluated as vaccine candidates administered as recombinant proteins, synthetic peptides, DNA-based plasmids, among others, with satisfactory protective response obtained in experimental models (Fiuza et al., Reference Fiuza, Gannavaram, Santiago Hda, Selvapandiyan, Souza, Passos, de Mendonça, Lemos-Giunchetti Dda, Ricci, Bartholomeu, Giunchetti, Bueno, Correa-Oliveira, Nakhasi and Fujiwara2015; Viana et al., Reference Viana, Fiuza, Gannavaram, Dey, Selvapandiyan, Bartholomeu, da Silveira-Lemos, Bueno, Dutra, Fujiwara, Nakhasi and Giunchetti2016; Abdellahi et al., Reference Abdellahi, Iraji, Mahmoudabadi and Hejazi2022; Tandon et al., Reference Tandon, Reyaz, Roshanara, Jadhav, Gandhi, Dey, Salotra, Nakhasi and Selvapandiyan2023; Avishek et al., Reference Avishek, Beg, Vats, Singh, Dey, Singh, Singh, Gannavaram, Ramesh, Mulla, Bhatnagar, Singh, Nakhasi, Salotra and Selvapandiyan2024). One strategy employed by researchers to elicit strong host immune response is the identification of protein epitopes that bind to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules (Germanó et al., Reference Germanó, Mackern-Oberti, Vitório, Duarte, Pimenta, Sanchez, Bruna, Lozano, Fernandes and Cargnelutti2022). It is known that proteins possess immunodominant T-cell epitopes, which induce immunity through presentation via MHC on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (Basmenj et al., Reference Basmenj, Arastonejad, Mamizadeh, Alem, KhalatbariLimaki, Ghiabi, Khamesipour, Majidiani, Shams and Irannejad2023). Thus, identifying the target epitopes can be efficient for the development of effective multi-epitope vaccines (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Kumar, Shrivastava, Dar, Lokhande, Singh, Singh, Velayutham and Mandal2023). In addition, the advancement of the bioinformatics has made it easier to identify potential T-cell epitopes of immunogenic candidates, such as those specific to human and murine cells antigens. Recombinant multi-epitope vaccines have greater potential for mass application, since they can express many immunogenic parts of proteins simultaneously (Clímaco et al., Reference Clímaco, Figueiredo, Lucas, Pinheiro, Magalhães, Oliveira, Almeida, Barbosa, Bartholomeu, Bueno, Mendes, Zhan, Jones, Hotez, Bottazzi, Oliveira and Fujiwara2023). This becomes especially challenging when considering the complex nature of VL and the genetic polymorphism of the host immune system (Coler et al., Reference Coler, Duthie, Hofmeyer, Guderian, Jayashankar, Vergara, Rolf, Misquith, Laurance, Raman, Bailor, Cauwelaert, Reed, Vallur, Favila, Orr, Ashman, Ghosh, Mondal and Reed2015). These new chimeric proteins have other advantages, such as the absence of infectious materials in their structural nature, good specificity and the potential for large-scale production at a lower cost (Ostolin et al., Reference Ostolin, Gusmão, Mathias, Cardoso, Roatt, Aguiar-Soares, Ruiz, Resende, Brito and Reis2021; Lage et al., Reference Lage, Vale, Linhares, Freitas, Machado, Cardoso, Oliveira, Galvani, Oliveira, Oliveira-da-Silva, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Pereira, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Christodoulides, Coelho and Martins2022; Ojha et al., Reference Ojha, Chand, Vellingiri and Prajapati2023). Therefore, immunogenic peptides can be identified within proteins previously described as vaccine candidates.

This work identified immunogenic T-cell epitopes from 5 L. infantum proteins [ATP synthase subunit beta mitochondria (SUZ42449.1), dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (AYU81901.1), dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase precursor (SUZ46653.1), S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (AYU83765.1) and vacuolar proton pump subunit B (AYU80416.1)], which were recently identified by antibodies in VL patient sera by an immunoproteomics approach performed by Machado et al. (Reference Machado, Lage, Vale, Freitas, Linhares, Cardoso, Oliveira-da-Silva, Pereira, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Maia, Menezes-Souza, Duarte, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides, Martins and Coelho2022a), and used them to construct the gene codifying a new chimeric protein called rCHI. Ten immunogenic epitopes specific to human and murine CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were identified and used to construct the chimera. This chimera was then produced and tested in BALB/c mice against L. infantum infection, being associated with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) and polymeric micelles (Mic) as an adjuvant and/or delivery system. Results showed that both combinations induced immunogenicity before and after infection, leading to significant reductions in the parasite burden in the infected animals. The animals developed a specific Th1-type cellular and humoral response, suggesting that rCHI plus MPLA or micelles could be considered as vaccine candidates to protect against VL.

Materials and methods

Reagents

A list containing the description of the antibodies and commercial kits used in this study is presented, with information about their catalogue numbers, source, company name, clone, among others (Supplementary Table 1).

Chimera design and epitope selection

For the construction of gene codifying rCHI, amino acid sequences from 5 parasite proteins were subjected to bioinformatics assays to select regions specific to murine and human T cell haplotypes containing immunogenic epitopes. For this, prediction of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells epitopes was performed using the Rankpep program (Reche and Reinherz, Reference Reche and Reinherz2007). The FASTA sequence of each protein was added to the input field and the alleles A02.01, A03.01, A24 and B07.02 were selected for human CD8+ T (MHC-I) cells, while the alleles H-2Db, H-2Dd, H-2Kb, H-2Kd, H -2Kk and H-2Ld were selected for murine CD8+ T cells. In the same way, the alleles HLA-DR1, HLA-DR2, HLA-DR3, HLA-DR4, HLA-DR5, HLA-DR8 (DRB1*0801), HLA-DR9, HLA-DR11 (DRB1*1101), HLA-DR12 (DRB1*1201), HLA-DR13 (DRB1*1301) and HLA-DR15 (DRB1*1501) were selected for human CD4+ (MHC-II) T cells, while the alleles H-2IAb, H-2IAd, H-2IAs, H-2IEd and H-2IEb were selected for murine CD4+ T cells. Then, for the ‘Binding threshold’ parameter, 2% was used for MHC-I and 5% for MHC-II, and in ‘Proteasome cleavage’ filter off was used. Next, we clicked send and the selected sequences were those that presented the highest percentage of prediction. The ABCpred program was used to predict B-cell epitopes, with a threshold of 0.85 in at least Window length used for the prediction of 16 (Saha and Raghava, Reference Saha and Raghava2006). As a consequence, protein regions containing specific T-cell epitopes from humans and mice, but without B-cell epitopes, were selected to construct the gene codifying rCHI. The ProtParam server (Gasteiger et al., Reference Gasteiger, Gattiker, Hoogland, Ivanyi, Appel and Bairoch2005) was used to predict the physical and chemical characteristics of protein including molecular weight, isoelectric point, amino acid residues, estimated half-life, instability index, aliphatic index and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY). The PepCalc server (www.pepcalc.com) was used to predict the protein solubility. The prediction of the secondary structure was performed by Jpred v.4 program.

Expression and purification of rCHI protein

The gene encoding rCHI was commercially synthesized by GenScript® (catalogue 1586730; Piscataway, NJ, USA). It was cloned into a pET-28a(+) expression vector and transformed into Artic Express cells (DE3, Agilent Technologies, USA). The rCHI expression was induced after the addition of 0.5 mm isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and cultures were shaken at 200 × g per min for 24 h at 12°C. Cells were ruptured by ultrasonication with 6 cycles of 30 s at 38 MHz, followed by 6 cycles of freezing (−196°C) and thawing (+37°C). Debris was removed by centrifugation and rCHI was purified using HisTrap HP affinity column connected to an AKTA system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). The eluted fractions containing the protein were concentrated using Amicon® ultra15 centrifugal filters 10 000 NMWL (Millipore, Germany) and purified on a Superdex™ 200 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). After purification, rCHI was passed through a polymyxin-agarose column to remove the residual endotoxin content (<10 ng of lipopolysaccharide per 1 mg of protein) using the Pierce™ Chromogenic Endotoxin Quant Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Preparation of the protein-containing micelles

To prepare rCHI-containing micelles, Poloxamer P407 (18% w/w; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 1 ×  phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 with moderate magnetic agitation and on ice bath. Complete dissolution of the polymer occurred after incubation for 18 h at 4°C. The protein (1.0 mg) was added to a microtube containing 1% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide, which was used as a co-solvent and solubilized using vortex mixing. It was added immediately to the Poloxamer P407 until a viscous emulsion was obtained. The Poloxamer P407 was kept at 4°C, and the mixture was freshly prepared on the day of immunization. The protein concentration was estimated at 0.79 mg mL−1 as described by (Pellosi et al., Reference Pellosi, Moret, Fraix, Marino, Maiolino, Gaio, Hioka, Reddi, Sortino and Quaglia2016). Empty micelles (18% w/w) were prepared using the same protocol, but without addition of rCHI.

Mice, parasite and preparation of Leishmania antigenic extract

Female BALB/c mice of 8 weeks of age were maintained under pathogen-free conditions. Leishmania infantum (MHOM/BR/1974/PP75) promastigotes were cultured at 24°C in complete Schneider's medium (Sigma-Aldrich), which was supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich), 20 mm L-glutamine, 200 U mL−1 penicillin and 100 μg mL−1 streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) at pH 7.4 (Coelho et al., Reference Coelho, Tavares, Carvalho, Chaves, Teixeira, Rodrigues, Charest, Matlashewski, Gazzinelli and Fernandes2003). Soluble Leishmania antigenic extract (SLA) was prepared using 109 stationary-phase promastigotes as described by Coelho et al. (Reference Coelho, Tavares, Carvalho, Chaves, Teixeira, Rodrigues, Charest, Matlashewski, Gazzinelli and Fernandes2003).

Vaccination and challenge infection

Mice (n = 16 per group) received the following treatment subcutaneously in their left hind footpad: (i) 50 μL of PBS (saline group); (ii) 50 μL of micelles (5 mg kg−1 body weight; Mic group); (iii) 50 μL of MPLA (25 μg; catalogue 1246298-63-4, Sigma-Aldrich) (MPLA group); (iv) 50 μL of chimera (25 μg) (rCHI group); (v) 50 μL of chimera (25 μg) plus MPLA (25 μg) (rCHI/MPLA group); and (vi) 50 μL of chimera incorporated into polymeric micelles (25 μg of protein and 5 mg kg−1 body weight of micelle) (rCHI/Mic group). Three doses were administered at 15-day intervals. Thirty days after the last dose, mice (n = 8 per group) were euthanized, and blood samples and spleens were collected for immunological assays. The other animals (n = 8 per group) were subcutaneously infected in their right hind footpad with 107 L. infantum stationary promastigotes. These animals were followed by 45 days, when they were euthanized and blood samples, spleens, livers, bone marrows (BMs) and draining lymph nodes (dLNs) were collected to perform the immunological, biochemical and parasitological analyses. The experimental strategy adopted in this study was based on others, recently described by Dias et al. (Reference Dias, Ribeiro, Martins, Lage, Costa, Chávez-Fumagalli, Ramos, Santos, Ludolf, Oliveira, Mendes, Silva, Galdino, Duarte, Roatt, Menezes-Souza, Teixeira and Coelho2018) and Lage et al. (Reference Lage, Ribeiro, Dias, Mendonça, Ramos, Carvalho, Oliveira, Steiner, Martins, Perin, Machado, Santos, Tavares, Oliveira-da-Silva, Oliveira, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Teixeira, Humbert, Coelho and Christodoulides2020, Reference Lage, Vale, Linhares, Freitas, Machado, Cardoso, Oliveira, Galvani, Oliveira, Oliveira-da-Silva, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Pereira, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Christodoulides, Coelho and Martins2022).

Cytokine and nitrite production

Cytokine response and nitrite production were measured as described by Lage et al. (Reference Lage, Vale, Linhares, Freitas, Machado, Cardoso, Oliveira, Galvani, Oliveira, Oliveira-da-Silva, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Pereira, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Christodoulides, Coelho and Martins2022). Briefly, animals’ spleens (n = 8 mice per group, each step) were collected before or after challenge, and splenocytes (5 × 106 cells per well) were incubated in DMEM added with 20% FBS, 20 mm L-glutamine, 200 U mL−1 penicillin and 100 μg mL−1 streptomycin at pH 7.4. Cells were either left unstimulated (background, control) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-12 levels were measured in culture supernatants by capture ELISA (BD OptEIA TM set mouse kits, Pharmingen®, San Diego, CA, USA), as per the manufacturer's protocol. Cell culture supernatant prepared after infection was also used to nitrite quantify through the Griess reaction. For this, 50 μL of culture supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of reagent, and absorbances were measured at 540 nm. The concentration of nitrite was calculated from a standard curve.

IFN-γ mRNA expression in SLA-stimulated cell cultures

A reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay was developed to evaluate the IFN-γ mRNA expression in stimulated spleen cell cultures as described by Lage et al. (Reference Lage, Martins, Vale, Freitas, Pimenta, Moreira, Ramos, Pereira, Bandeira, Jesus, Ludolf, Tavares, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides and Coelho2023). For this, spleens were removed from euthanized animals (n = 8 per group, each step) collected before and after challenge, and RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was resuspended in UltraPure™ DNase/RNase-free distilled water (Invitrogen) and concentration was measured spectrophotometrically in a NanoDrop LITE reader (Thermo Scientific), with absorbance ratios of 260/280 nm. RNA quality was evaluated in an electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel, and it was treated for 15 min at room temperature with DNAse (Invitrogen). This enzyme was deactivated using 25 mm EDTA for 10 min at 65°C, and RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed in an Applied Biosystems High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Thermo Scientific), forming cDNA using the following parameters: 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 120 min and 85°C for 5 min. RT-qPCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems PowerUp™ SYBR™ Green PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific), with gene-specific primers for IFN-γ: 5′-TCAAGTGGCATAGATGTGGAAGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGGCTCTGCAGGATTTTCATG-3′ (reverse), in a 7900HT Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems). Transcripts were normalized using ACTB and GAPDH housekeeping genes. The procedure was optimized by adjusting the primer concentrations to 5.0, 10.0 and 15.0 pmol to test for optimal specificity and efficiency. The purity of PCR products was evaluated through melting curves and gel electrophoresis. The cycle parameters were: (i) initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, (ii) 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, (iii) annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 min and (iv) dissociation stage for recording the melting curve. Results are shown graphically as the fold changes in gene expression by using the mean ± standard deviation of target gene. Data were analysed by the relative expression using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Flow cytometry

A flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the frequency of T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-10 in SLA-stimulated cell cultures, which were collected after infection as described by Brito et al. (Reference Brito, Ruiz, Cardoso, Ostolin, Reis, Mathias, Aguiar-Soares, Roatt, Corrêa-Oliveira, Resende and Reis2020). Spleen cells (5 × 106 per well) were incubated in complete RPMI medium in 96-well round-bottom plates, and were either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with SLA (25 μg mL−1) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) (10 mg mL−1) was added in the cultures, 4 h before the end of the period of incubation. Some cultures were stimulated with Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (5 ng mL−1) and ionomycin (1 mg mL−1), used as positive control. Subsequently, cells were stained by Fixable Viability Stain 450 (FVS450, BD Biosciences, San Diego, California, USA) for 15 min at room temperature, followed by labelling with antibodies against CD3+ (BV650 anti-mouse, clone 145.2C11), CD4+ (BV605 anti-mouse, clone RM4-5) and CD8+ (BV786 anti-mouse, clone 53–6.7) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were fixed with FACS fixing solution, washed and permeabilized with PBS buffer plus 0.5% saponin and stained with antibodies against IFN-γ (AF700 anti-mouse, clone XMG1.2), TNF-α (PE-Cy7 anti-mouse, clone LG.3A10) and IL-10 (APC anti-mouse, clone JES5-16E) for 30 min at room temperature. All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Cells acquisition (100 000 events) was performed on LSR Fortessa cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FACSDiva software. FlowJo software was used for analysis, dead cells were excluded after FVS450 stain and alive cells were gated for stained CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells and intracellular cytokine production. The frequencies of positive T cells were evaluated in terms of percentages, in which ratios between the SLA-stimulated (SC) vs unstimulated (medium, CC) cultures were calculated and showed as indexes. The gating strategy used to characterize the frequency (in percentage) of T cells producing the cytokines IFN-γ, TNF and IL-10 through the Boolean gate strategy is shown (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Analysis of humoral response

The antibody production was evaluated in animals’ sera, which were collected before and after infection (n = 8 per group, each step). Levels of anti-rCHI and anti-SLA IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes were measured as described by Lage et al. (Reference Lage, Vale, Linhares, Freitas, Machado, Cardoso, Oliveira, Galvani, Oliveira, Oliveira-da-Silva, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Pereira, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Christodoulides, Coelho and Martins2022). Previous titration curves were established to obtain the most appropriate concentration of antigen and serum dilutions to be used in the assays. Microtiter plates (Jetbiofil®, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) were coated with rCHI or SLA (0.25 and 1.0 μg per well, respectively) in coating buffer (50 mm carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) for 16 h at 4°C. Free binding sites were blocked using 250 μL of PBS-T (PBS plus Tween 20 0.05% v/v) added with 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin for 1 h at 37°C. After washing the plates 5 times with PBS-T, wells were incubated with 100 μL of individual sera (1:100 diluted in PBS-T) for 1 h at 37°C. Plates were washed 5 times with PBS-T and incubated with antibodies specific to IgG1 (1: 10 000 diluted in PBS-T; rat anti-mouse IgG1 secondary antibody, peroxidase-conjugated antibody, catalogue SA1-35640, Invitrogen) or IgG2a (1: 20 000 diluted in PBS-T; rat anti-mouse IgG2a secondary antibody, peroxidase-conjugated antibody, catalogue SA1-35646, Invitrogen) isotypes. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, wells were washed 5 times with PBS-T, and reactions were developed using H2O2, ortho-phenylenediamine and citrate–phosphate buffer pH 5.0, for 30 min and in the dark. Reactions were stopped by adding 2N H2SO4, and optical density (OD) values were read in a spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Spectra Max Plus, Concord, Canada) at 492 nm.

Organ toxicity

Sera samples were collected from mice (n = 8 per group) 45 days after challenge, when levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase, urea and creatinine enzymes were measured as described by Machado et al. (Reference Machado, Lage, Vale, Freitas, Linhares, Cardoso, Pereira, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Oliveira-Da-Silva, Bandeira, Simões, Duarte, Oliveira, Christodoulides, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Martins and Coelho2022b). The evaluations were performed using commercial kits (Labtest Diagnostica®, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Sera from non-infected and non-immunized mice (n = 5) were used as control.

Parasite load evaluated through a limiting dilution assay

The parasite load was evaluated in the infected animals (n = 8 per group) as described by Freitas et al. (Reference Freitas, Lage, Machado, Vale, Martins, Cardoso, Oliveira-Da-Silva, Reis, Tavares, Ramos, Ludolf, Pereira, Bandeira, Fujiwara, Bueno, Roatt, Chávez-Fumagalli and Coelho2023). Spleens, livers, BMs and dLNs were collected and macerated in a glass tissue grinder using sterile PBS, and tissue debris was removed by centrifugation at 150 × g. Cells were concentrated by centrifugation at 2000 × g and resuspended in 1 mL of complete Schneider's medium, and serially diluted 10−1 to 10−12 in the same medium. Each sample was plated in triplicate and cultured for 7 days at 24°C. Results were expressed as the negative log of the titre (the dilution corresponding to the last positive well) adjusted per milligram of organ.

Parasitism evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Splenic parasitism was also evaluated by qPCR after infection (n = 8 per group) as described by Machado et al. (Reference Machado, Lage, Vale, Freitas, Linhares, Cardoso, Oliveira-da-Silva, Pereira, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Maia, Menezes-Souza, Duarte, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides, Martins and Coelho2022a). DNA content was extracted using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), and suspended in UltraPure™ DNase/RNase-free distilled water (Invitrogen). Parasite load was estimated using primers to amplify L. infantum kDNA: forward 5’-CCTATTTTACACCAACCCCCAGT-3’ and reverse 5’-GGGTAGGGGCGTTCTGCGAAA-3’. These primers are used to amplify a Leishmania specific and conserved region, which is used as an indicative of the presence of parasite DNA. Primers (forward 5’-CAGAGCAAGAGAGGTATCC-3’ and reverse 5’-TCATTGTAGAAGGTGTGGTGC-3’) were used to amplify the mouse β-actin gene, as endogenous control. Reactions were developed in a 7500 HT apparatus (96-well plate; Applied Biosystems) using the Applied Biosystems PowerUp™ SYBR™ Green PCR master mix (5 μL; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) added with 2 mm of each primer (1 μL) and 4 μL of DNA (25 ng μL−1). Samples were incubated for 10 min at 95°C and submitted to 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. At each time point, fluorescence data were collected and results were calculated by interpolation from a standard curve included in the same run, which was prepared in duplicate and expressed as the number of L. infantum organisms per total DNA.

Human blood samples and cytokine production

Blood samples (20 mL) were collected from VL patients (n = 6, including 2 males and 4 females, with ages ranging from 27 to 54 years), before and 6 months after their treatment, which was performed with pentavalent antimonials (Sanofi Aventis Farmacêutica Ltda., Suzano, São Paulo, Brazil). In addition, blood samples were also collected from healthy individuals (n = 6, including 1 male and 5 females, ranging from 30 to 44 years of age) living in an endemic region of disease (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil). PBMCs were purified by density centrifugation through Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma-Aldrich) as described by Oliveira-da-Silva et al. (Reference Oliveira-da-Silva, Machado, Ramos, Tavares, Lage, Mendonça, Pereira, Santos, Martins, Carvalho, Freitas, Ludolf, Reis, Bandeira, Silva, Costa, Oliveira, Duarte, Roatt, Teixeira and Coelho2020). Cells (107 per mL) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium added with 20% FBS, 2 mm L-glutamine, 200 U mL−1 penicillin, 100 μg mL−1 streptomycin, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mm sodium pyruvate and 1 × non-essential amino acid at pH 7.4. They were either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 50 μg mL−1, respectively) for 120 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and IFN-γ and IL-10 levels were measured using commercial kits (BD OptEIA™ Human IFN-γ and IL-10 ELISA Set, catalogues 555142 and 555157, respectively; BD Biosciences), as per the manufacturer's protocol.

Proliferation induced by rCHI in splenocyte cultures after infection

Cell proliferation induced by rCHI was evaluated in spleen cell cultures after infection as described by Ratnapriya et al. (Reference Ratnapriya, Keerti, Yadav, Dube and Sahasrabuddhe2021). Cells (106 cells mL−1) were incubated in 100 μL of complete RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates (Nunc, Denmark). They were either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 μg mL−1, each) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Concanavalin A (ConA, 5 μg mL−1; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as control. MTT 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) was later added to the cultures and the OD values read in a Vmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at 570 nm.

In vitro toxicity induced by rCHI

The cytotoxic effect of rCHI was in vitro assessed in peritoneal macrophages obtained from naive mice. Cells were stimulated with 3% Fluid Thioglycollate Medium for 96 h at 37°C, when they were collected and plated (5 × 105 cells per well) in 100 μl of complete RPMI in 96-well cell culture plates (Nunc). They were either left untreated (medium) or stimulated in triplicate with 1.0, 10.0 and 100.0 μg mL−1 of rCHI, SLA or AmpB. Cell viability was assessed through MTT assay after incubation for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. The OD values were measured in a Vmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices) at 570 nm, and the cell viability was calculated by comparing the percentage of untreated and treated cells through the formula: cell viability(%) = (absorbance of treated cells/absorbance of untreated cells) × 100.

Statistical analysis

Results were entered into Microsoft Excel (version 10.0) spreadsheets and analysed using GraphPad Prism™ (version 6.0 for Windows). One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups. Experiments were repeated twice, and results are representative of one of them. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Construction and characterization of rCHI protein

The amino acid sequences from 5 Leishmania proteins called ATP synthase subunit beta mitochondria (SUZ42449.1), dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (AYU81901.1), dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase precursor (SUZ46653.1), S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (AYU83765.1) and vacuolar proton pump subunit B (AYU80416.1) were evaluated to select human and murine CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell epitopes, which were used to construct the gene codifying rCHI. The following T-cell epitopes were predicted: ALGGTCLNVGCIPSK and RLGAEVTVVEFASRCAANTDADVSKAL of AYU81901.1; LHMTVQTAVLIETLKALGAE and FLPKALDEKVAALHLAHVGA of AYU83765.1; ISRGQKIPLF and ALREVSAAREEVPGRRGFPGYMYTNLACI of AYU80416.1; IIMELINNVAKGHGGFSVFAGVGER and VAQDIVQMLTKYKELQDIIA of SUZ42449.1; and YYLFDDCRVDNMLALIKQLNAK and VKAVARANILVPEVNSSWQGDFIRQY of SUZ46653.1 protein. They were grouped linearly with a spacing of 2 GLY and 1 LYS residues between them, and 2 additional LYS residues were added in the initial and terminal portions of protein sequence to make it soluble and easy to purify (Fig. 1). The Jpred 4 program was used to predict the protein secondary structure, and regions indicating alpha helices are highlighted in red, while beta sheets are indicated in green. The chimeric protein presents 247 amino acid residues, an estimated molecular weight of 26.4 kDa, and isoelectric point of 9.67. In addition, the instability index, aliphatic index and GRAVY values of rCHI are 17.36, 94.41 and −0.017, respectively.

Figure 1. Alignment of T-cell epitopes used for the construction of the chimeric protein. Ten T-cell epitopes predicted from amino acid sequences of SUZ42449.1, AYU81901.1, SUZ46653.1, AYU83765.1 and AYU80416.1 proteins were linearly grouped with a spacing of 2 glycine and 1 lysine residues between them. The 3-dimensional structure provided by Uniprot server is presented in the first upper part of the figure. At the bottom, the protein is linearly showed with details of its secondary structure, which was provided by the jPred server, indicating the presence of alpha helices and beta sheets.

Cellular response developed before and after L. infantum infection

We investigated if the rCHI vaccine, when associated with MPLA or micelles as adjuvant and/or delivery, could stimulate the development of a specific immune response in vaccinated mice. We used unvaccinated mice and those receiving only MPLA, micelle or protein as controls. Results showed that vaccination with rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic induced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-12 in stimulated cell cultures, which were associated with significantly lower production of IL-4 and IL-10 before challenge (Fig. 2A). After infection, the cytokine profile was maintained unaltered in these animals. On the other hand, mice from control groups produced significantly higher levels of anti-SLA IL-4 and IL-10 cytokines, when compared to those vaccinated with rCHI plus MPLA or micelles (Fig. 2B). The nitrite production was evaluated as a marker of the macrophage's activation after infection, and results showed that rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic induced significantly higher levels of antileishmanial nitrite, when compared to data obtained in control mice (Fig. 3A). The expression of IFN-γ mRNA in stimulated cell cultures was also evaluated after challenge, and results were significantly higher in the rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic groups, as compared to the controls (Fig. 3B). The frequency of T cells producing cytokine was evaluated and results were presented as indexes derived from the ratio between the values found in the stimulated vs unstimulated cell cultures. Results showed that mice receiving rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic and challenged presented higher ratios in the levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, when compared to values found in control group mice, which showed higher ratios of IL-10-producing T cells (Fig. 4). We can then suggest that rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic induced the development of a polarized Th1-type cellular response in mice from rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic groups, as compared to the others, both before and after infection.

Figure 2. Cytokine production before and after L. infantum infection. Mice (n = 16 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, animals (n = 8 per group) were euthanized and spleens were collected. Splenocytes (5 × 106 per well) were cultured in DMEM either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively), for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and levels of IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-4 and IL-10 were measured through a capture ELISA (A). The others (n = 8 per group) were infected and, 45 days post-challenge, they were euthanized and spleens were collected and used in the same procedure. Results obtained in the cytokine levels are shown (B). Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic and MPLA groups (P < 0.0001). (+) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the rCHI, rCHI/Mic and rCHI/MPLA groups (P < 0.01).

Figure 3. Nitrite production and IFN-γ mRNA expression after infection. Mice spleens (n = 8 per group) were collected on the 45th day after infection, and splenocytes (5 × 106 per well) were cultured in DMEM and either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively), for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and used to evaluate the rCHI- and SLA-specific nitrite production by Griess reaction (in A). In addition, stimulated cell cultures were used to extract RNA content, which was employed to evaluate the IFN-γ mRNA expression through RT-qPCR (in B). Relative gene expression is shown as 2^ − ΔΔCT. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 4. Flow cytometry analysis of T cells using spleen of L. infantum-infected mice. BALB/c mice were immunized and later challenged with L. infantum promastigotes. Forty-five days post-infection, spleens were collected and spleen cells were either left unstimulated (control) or stimulated with SLA (25 μg mL−1) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. The frequency (in terms of percentage) of T-cell producers of cytokines was obtained and values were used to calculate ratios between SLA-stimulated (SC) vs unstimulated (control, CC) cell cultures, which were presented as indexes. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (**) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline and Mic groups. (***) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic and MPLA groups. The connecting line indicates significant difference (P < 0.05) between the rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic groups.

Antibody production before and after infection

The humoral response was evaluated before and after infection by means of estimation of the levels of anti-rCHI and anti-SLA IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies. Before challenge, mice vaccinated with rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic produced significantly higher levels of IgG2a antibodies, and ratios calculated using the OD values of both isotypes showed that these animals presented higher IgG2a/IgG1 levels, as compared to the other groups, by using SLA (Fig. 5A) or rCHI (Fig. 5B) as antigens. After infection, the humoral profile was maintained, since mice receiving rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic produced higher levels of anti-rCHI and anti-SLA IgG2a antibodies, which reflected in higher ratios between IgG2a/IgG1 levels, as compared to the control groups, by using SLA (Fig. 5C) or rCHI (Fig. 5D) as antigens. In this context, rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic group mice developed a specific Th1-type humoral response before and after infection.

Figure 5. Humoral response before and after L. infantum infection. Mice (n = 16 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, blood samples from 8 animals per group were collected. The other mice (n = 8 per group) were infected and, 45 days post-challenge, their blood samples were collected. In both cases, blood was used to obtain serum and quantify the levels of anti-SLA and anti-rCHI IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies. The optical density (OD) values were obtained and used to calculate the ratios between the IgG2a/IgG1 levels, before (A and B) and after (C and D) challenge infection. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

In vivo toxicity evaluated after L. infantum infection

We evaluated the organic toxicity after challenge infection, and results showed that the vaccination with rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic reduced the levels of creatinine (Fig. 6A), urea (Fig. 6B), ALT (Fig. 6C) and AST (Fig. 6D), when compared to values found in control group mice, which presented higher levels of these renal and hepatic damage markers, suggesting possibly organic alterations caused by own L. infantum infection.

Figure 6. In vivo toxicity after L. infantum infection. The organic toxicity was evaluated in sera samples collected from infected animals (n = 8 per group). Levels of creatinine, urea, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured using commercial kits. Samples collected from non-infected and non-vaccinated (naive) mice were used as control. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Evaluation of the parasite load in infected and vaccinated mice

The parasite load in animals’ organs was evaluated by a limiting dilution assay, and results showed rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic induced significantly lower levels of parasitism in spleens, livers, BMs and dLNs of the animals, when compared to control mice (Fig. 7). In this context, reductions in the order of 4.8-, 2.8-, 2.3- and 5.5-log were found in livers, spleens, BMs and dLNs of rCHI/MPLA group mice, as compared to saline group, as well as reductions in the order of 4.3-, 2.2-, 2.0- and 5.0-log were found in livers, spleens, BMs and dLNs of rCHI/Mic group mice, as compared to data found in saline group mice. The splenic parasitism was also evaluated by qPCR, and results corroborated with those obtained by limiting dilution assay, with rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic group mice presenting significant reductions in the order of 76.0 and 73.0%, respectively, in the splenic parasitism, as compared to values obtained in saline group mice (Fig. 8).

Figure 7. Parasite burden estimated through a limiting dilution assay. Mice (n = 8 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last dose, they were challenged with L. infantum promastigotes; and 45 days post-challenge, spleens, livers, bone marrows (BMs) and draining lymph nodes (dLNs) were used to evaluate the parasite load through limiting dilution assay. Results were expressed as the negative log of the titre adjusted per milligram of organ. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 8. Splenic parasitism evaluated through qPCR. Mice (n = 8 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, they were challenged with L. infantum promastigotes; and 45 days post-challenge, spleens were used to evaluate the parasite load through qPCR. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

In vitro immunogenicity induced by rCHI in human cells

The in vitro immunogenicity was also evaluated in PBMC culture obtained from VL patients before and after their treatment, as well as from healthy subjects. Results showed significantly higher levels of IFN-γ after rCHI stimulus, in both cell cultures from treated patients and healthy subjects, when compared to values obtained in untreated patients (Fig. 9). Otherwise, significantly higher levels of IL-4 and IL-10 were found when SLA was used as a stimulus of cell culture of untreated patients, as compared to values obtained after stimulation using rCHI.

Figure 9. Immunogenicity induced by rCHI and SLA in human cell cultures. PBMCs (107 cells per well) obtained from healthy subjects (n = 6) and VL patients (n = 6), those collected before and 6 months after their treatment, were either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively) for 5 days at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 levels were measured through a capture ELISA. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the unstimulated control (medium) or after SLA stimulus (P < 0.0001). (+) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the stimulus using the rCHI protein (P < 0.0001).

In vitro lymphoproliferation and toxicity in murine cells

The in vitro proliferative response was evaluated in splenocyte cultures after infection, and results showed higher lymphoproliferation in cell cultures obtained from rCHI/Mic and rCHI/MPLA group mice, when compared to values found in control group mice, after stimulus using either rCHI or SLA (Fig. 10). Additionally, an in vitro toxicity study was performed using murine macrophages from uninfected and unvaccinated mice, and results showed that, even when a high concentration of rCHI or SLA was added in the cultures (100 μg well−1), a very low toxicity was found, with values of cellular viability higher than 92.0%. On the other hand, using AmpB at a concentration of 10 μg mL−1 results in the cellular viability of 38.5%.

Figure 10. In vitro proliferative response induced by rCHI and SLA stimulation. The in vitro cell proliferation was evaluated in spleen cell cultures of infected animals (n = 8, per group). Cells (106 per well) were incubated in complete RPMI 1640 medium and either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 μg mL−1, each) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. MTT was added to the cultures and the OD values read in a microplate reader at 570 nm. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Discussion

Vaccination is a preventive measure considered against VL, which presents 2 main objectives, i.e. induction of a specific immune response to combat the parasite and/or prevent the infection, and the generation of long-lasting immunity (Abdellahi et al., Reference Abdellahi, Iraji, Mahmoudabadi and Hejazi2022). Despite vaccine development advancements, few candidates are available to protect against canine VL as described by Duarte et al. (Reference Duarte, Lage, Martins, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Menezes-Souza, Goulart, Soto, Tavares and Coelho2016) and García-Castro et al. (Reference García-Castro, Egui, Thomas and López2022), and a human vaccine still does not exist (Srivastava et al., Reference Srivastava, Shankar, Mishra and Singh2016; Ikeogu et al., Reference Ikeogu, Akaluka, Edechi, Salako, Onyilagha, Barazandeh and Uzonna2020). In this highlight, the search to reach an effective vaccine candidate continues. In the last decades, vaccination using single parasite proteins has allowed to the identification of candidates to protect against VL (Sachdeva et al., Reference Sachdeva, Banerjea, Malla and Dubey2009; Coler et al., Reference Coler, Duthie, Hofmeyer, Guderian, Jayashankar, Vergara, Rolf, Misquith, Laurance, Raman, Bailor, Cauwelaert, Reed, Vallur, Favila, Orr, Ashman, Ghosh, Mondal and Reed2015; Machado et al., Reference Machado, Lage, Vale, Freitas, Linhares, Cardoso, Oliveira-da-Silva, Pereira, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Maia, Menezes-Souza, Duarte, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides, Martins and Coelho2022a). However, this vaccine strategy presents drawbacks, since the concept of a single antigen to protect against a complex parasite has limitations, mainly related to the large antigenic repertoire of Leishmania spp. (Ostolin et al., Reference Ostolin, Gusmão, Mathias, Cardoso, Roatt, Aguiar-Soares, Ruiz, Resende, Brito and Reis2021). Therefore, the idea of using multiple proteins or chimeric antigens containing distinct T-cell epitopes as vaccine candidates has highlighted new perspectives, and promising results have been obtained (Lage et al., Reference Lage, Vale, Linhares, Freitas, Machado, Cardoso, Oliveira, Galvani, Oliveira, Oliveira-da-Silva, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Pereira, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Christodoulides, Coelho and Martins2022; Agallou et al., Reference Agallou, Margaroni and Karagouni2023). A multivalent vaccine presents benefits, which include low cost to manufacture and scalability, as well as the possibility to group distinct T-cell epitopes from different parasite proteins in a single molecule; which could be more effective to protect dogs and humans (Lage et al., Reference Lage, Ribeiro, Dias, Mendonça, Ramos, Carvalho, Oliveira, Steiner, Martins, Perin, Machado, Santos, Tavares, Oliveira-da-Silva, Oliveira, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Teixeira, Humbert, Coelho and Christodoulides2020; Bhattacharjee et al., Reference Bhattacharjee, Banerjee and Mukherjee2023).

In the present study, we developed a new multi-peptide vaccine based on the selection of 10 human and murine T-cell epitopes from 5 L. infantum proteins, and to use it to protect mice against VL. Results showed that rCHI induced cell proliferation in murine macrophage, with the association of higher production of IL-12 and lower levels of IL-4 and IL-10 obtained in the culture supernatants. Additionally, rCHI stimulated the development of a Th1-type cellular response in PBMC cultures from healthy subjects and treated patients, suggesting the possibility to be used as a human vaccine (Dias et al., Reference Dias, Ribeiro, Martins, Lage, Costa, Chávez-Fumagalli, Ramos, Santos, Ludolf, Oliveira, Mendes, Silva, Galdino, Duarte, Roatt, Menezes-Souza, Teixeira and Coelho2018; Lage et al., Reference Lage, Ribeiro, Dias, Mendonça, Ramos, Carvalho, Oliveira, Steiner, Martins, Perin, Machado, Santos, Tavares, Oliveira-da-Silva, Oliveira, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Teixeira, Humbert, Coelho and Christodoulides2020). We then prepared 2 compositions, i.e. rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic, and tested them to immunize BALB/c mice. Results showed that both compositions stimulated the Th1-type response based on significantly higher levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-12 in stimulated splenocyte cultures; contributing to activate the microbicidal mechanisms of host cell to produce nitric oxide and other molecules to kill internalized parasites (Vakili et al., Reference Vakili, Nezafat, Zare, Erfani, Akbari, Ghasemi, Rahbar and Hatam2020; Elmahallawy et al., Reference Elmahallawy, Alkhaldi and Saleh2021).

In our study, rCHI alone induced some IFN-γ production and a slight degree of reduction of the parasite load in vaccinated animals; however, it was not sufficient to completely protect them from L. infantum infection. On the other hand, the association with MPLA or micelles increased the immunogenic effect of rCHI to the host immune system, making then possible to infer that the protection was improved by the association of such products with the recombinant antigen to protect against challenge infection (Das et al., Reference Das, Asad, Sabur, Didwania and Ali2018; Machado et al., Reference Machado, Lage, Vale, Freitas, Linhares, Cardoso, Oliveira-da-Silva, Pereira, Ramos, Tavares, Ludolf, Bandeira, Maia, Menezes-Souza, Duarte, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides, Martins and Coelho2022a). In fact, recombinant proteins usually require the association of adjuvants to induction of a stronger cellular response, with this activation based on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, the vaccination using antigen and adjuvant can be considered as a requirement for better effectiveness of vaccine candidates to offer a complete protection against VL as described by others (Ratnapriya et al., Reference Ratnapriya, Keerti, Sahasrabuddhe and Dube2019). MPLA is a Toll-like receptor-activating immune agonist that stimulates innate immunity resulting in the induction of an antigen-specific adaptive immunity. This adjuvant is approved for human use and it has been evaluated in clinical phase III trials (Van Haren et al., Reference Van Haren, Ganapathi, Bergelson, Dowling, Banks, Samuels, Reed, Marshall and Levy2016; Li et al., Reference Li, Hao, Pan, Wang and Min2023). Micelles composed of amphiphilic block copolymers have been also evaluated with therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. A variety of these polymers is evaluated as delivery and adjuvant in nanomedicine, and significant advances were made with the association of micelles to optimize the action of prophylactic and therapeutic candidates (Cabral and Kataoka, Reference Cabral and Kataoka2014). Here, we found that vaccination with the rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic induced significant protection against L. infantum infection, since significant reductions in the parasite load were found in several organs of the animals, at 45 days post-challenge. Similar results were also found in other studies, where chimeric proteins plus adjuvants were employed to protect against murine VL (Lage et al., Reference Lage, Ribeiro, Dias, Mendonça, Ramos, Carvalho, Oliveira, Steiner, Martins, Perin, Machado, Santos, Tavares, Oliveira-da-Silva, Oliveira, Roatt, Machado-de-Ávila, Teixeira, Humbert, Coelho and Christodoulides2020; Agallou et al., Reference Agallou, Margaroni and Karagouni2023; Bhattacharjee et al., Reference Bhattacharjee, Banerjee and Mukherjee2023); suggesting that the potential of our vaccine candidate to be protective against the disease.

Concomitantly to the evaluation of the parasitological and immunological efficacy of vaccine candidates; clinical safety assessments in mammals are also relevant with the purpose to verify if such candidates are or not toxic for the hosts, as well as if they can reduce the toxicity caused by their own Leishmania infection (Queiroz et al., Reference Queiroz, Barbosa, Oliveira, Alves, Alves, Carregaro, Silva, Barreiro, Alexandre-Moreira and Lima2022; Lage et al., Reference Lage, Martins, Vale, Freitas, Pimenta, Moreira, Ramos, Pereira, Bandeira, Jesus, Ludolf, Tavares, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Christodoulides and Coelho2023). In this context, toxicological studies such as those evaluating biochemical markers can contribute to indicate possible organic alterations in the infected animals (Mendonça et al., Reference Mendonça, Martins, Lage, Dias, Ribeiro, Carvalho, Dias, Miyazaki, Menezes-Souza, Roatt, Tavares, Barichello, Duarte and Coelho2018). The dissemination of L. infantum to organs, such as BMs, livers and spleens cause alterations in the organic machinery and alter biochemical components in infected hosts (Carrión et al., Reference Carrión, Nieto, Iborra, Iniesta, Soto, Folgueira, Abanades, Requena and Alonso2006; Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Costa, Chavez-Fumagalli, Valadares, Duarte, Costa, Martins, Gomes, Melo, Soto, Tavares and Coelho2012). This fact is consistent with the observation that spleen and BM seem to be sites of chronic infection, where parasites survive for long time (Rousseau et al., Reference Rousseau, Demartino, Anjuère, Ferrua, Fragaki, Le Fichoux and Kubar2001; Lai et al., Reference Lai, Heinemann, Schleicher, Schett, Bogdan, Bozec and Soulat2023). In our study, we found significantly lower levels of hepatic (ALT and AST) and renal (urea and creatinine) damage markers in mice from rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic groups, as compared to values found in control mice. In fact, hepatocellular enzymes, such as AST and ALT, can be useful in detecting hepatic injury caused by damage in the cell membrane (Duarte et al., Reference Duarte, Lage, Martins, Chávez-Fumagalli, Roatt, Menezes-Souza, Goulart, Soto, Tavares and Coelho2016). Otherwise, higher levels of urea and creatinine indicate alterations in the kidney function, which are commonly associated with alterations in the glomerular filtration rate (Torres et al., Reference Torres, Chitarra, Nakazato, Almeida and Sousa2016). Therefore, we can conclude that both rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic exerted a positive protective role in the animals’ organic function, contributing to reduced levels of hepatic and renal enzymes even in L. infantum-infected mice

The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12, among others, induces the nitric oxide production and oxygen-derivative molecules by host macrophages that are relevant for the Leishmania elimination (Vakili et al., Reference Vakili, Nezafat, Zare, Erfani, Akbari, Ghasemi, Rahbar and Hatam2020). Results showed that rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic induced the production of high levels of these Th1-type cytokines in splenocyte cultures from vaccinated animals, with this high production being maintained after challenge. On the other hand, spleen cell cultures of control group mice produced higher levels of IL-4 and IL-10, indicating that the development of a Th2-type response and progression of the disease corroborated with the high parasitism found in such animals (Toepp and Petersen, Reference Toepp and Petersen2020). These data support the potential protective role of rCHI plus adjuvant against VL. Similarly for the production of Th1-type cytokines, antibodies generated during infection are relevant to evaluate the susceptibility or resistance against infection. In fact, the induction of IgG1 and IgG2a isotypes corresponding to Th2- and Th1-type responses, respectively, contributes to the understanding of the immunological response developed in vaccinated hosts (Lehmann et al., Reference Lehmann, Enssle, Lehmann, Emmendörfer and Lohmann-Matthes2000). Higher level of IgG2a is usually related to the presence of IFN-γ, while the production of IL-4 induces the switch of antibody isotype with the production of IgG1. In our study, significantly higher levels of anti-rCHI and anti-SLA IgG2a isotype antibodies were found after vaccination using rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic, both before and after infection, suggesting the development of a Th1-type humoral response in such vaccinated animals.

The cytokine profile in PBMC cultures obtained from healthy subjects and VL patients was evaluated as a prospection for future use of rCHI as a human vaccine (Vale et al., Reference Vale, Dias, Machado, Ribeiro, Lage, Costa, Steiner, Tavares, Ramos, Martínez-Rodrigo, Chávez-Fumagalli, Caligiorne, Magalhães-Soares, Silveira, Machado-de-Ávila, Teixeira and Coelho2019; Oliveira-da-Silva et al., Reference Oliveira-da-Silva, Machado, Ramos, Tavares, Lage, Mendonça, Pereira, Santos, Martins, Carvalho, Freitas, Ludolf, Reis, Bandeira, Silva, Costa, Oliveira, Duarte, Roatt, Teixeira and Coelho2020). The induction of cell-mediated immunity is important for the protection against human VL. In fact, VL stimulates the production profile of Th2-type cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10 and TGF-β, as well as low proliferative response, when in in vitro cell cultures are stimulated with parasite antigens. In our study, rCHI stimulated the production of high levels of IFN-γ, when cell cultures from both healthy subjects and treated patients were stimulated with the protein. In addition, low levels of IL-4 and IL-10 were encountered in the culture supernatant, suggesting then that rCHI can active the human cells after in vitro stimulation. These data corroborate with others (Suman et al., Reference Suman, Amit, Singh, Gupta, Equbal, Kumari, Topno, Ravidas, Pandey, Bimal, Das and Ali2018; Oliveira-da-Silva et al., Reference Oliveira-da-Silva, Machado, Ramos, Tavares, Lage, Mendonça, Pereira, Santos, Martins, Carvalho, Freitas, Ludolf, Reis, Bandeira, Silva, Costa, Oliveira, Duarte, Roatt, Teixeira and Coelho2020; Santos et al., Reference Santos, Machado, Ramos, Oliveira-da-Silva, Lage, Tavares, Mendonça, Cardoso, Siqueira, Martins, Ludolf, Reis, Carvalho, Freitas, Bandeira, Silva, Oliveira, Moreira, Fujiwara, Roatt, Chávez-Fumagalli, Humbert, Teixeira and Coelho2021), in which recombinant proteins showed also stimulation of human immune cells for the production of Th1-type cytokines; thus altering the susceptibility profile associated with the active disease and Th2-type response.

Limitations of the study include the low number of samples from healthy subjects and VL patients, besides the absence of comparative measurements in antibody levels to corroborate with data obtained in the cytokine production. In addition, new experiments to evaluate the organic parasitism by means of histopathologic assays in infected animals should be also performed to align with data obtained in the parasite load by limiting dilution assay and qPCR. Future studies would also address the duration of protective response following the immunization with rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic and challenge infection, with the purpose to determine the extension of the long-lasting Th1-type immunity in these animals. In this context, data presented here stand out to be considered as a proof-of-concept of this new recombinant antigen to induce immune stimulation in distinct mammalians and to protect against experimental VL.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182024001240

Data availability statement

All data are available in this article.

Author contributions

E. A. F. C., A. L. T., M. A. C.-F., B. M. R. and R. A. M.-d.-A. conceived and designed the experiments. D. P. L., D. L. V., F. A. G. M., V. T. M., M. G. P. S., N. C. G., M. M. C., G. J. L. M., E. M. S, C. S. F., B. L. P., K. O. M. F., S. S. G. D., R. S. B., I. A. G. P. and G. S. V. T. performed the experiments. E. A. F. C., B. M. R., M. A. C.-F. and D. P. L. analysed the data. A. L. T. and B. M. R. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. E. A. F. C., B. M. R. and M. A. C.-F. wrote the paper.

Financial support

The authors thank the Laboratório Multiusuário de Citometria de Fluxo (LMUCF/NUPEB/UFOP) from Federal University of Ouro Preto (Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil) for providing the equipment and technical support for the experiments using the LSRFortessa Cytometer. This work was supported by grants APQ-02167-21 and RED-0067-23 (Rede Mineira de Imunobiológicos) from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and by grant 402417/2023-2 from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). The authors also thank the Brazilian agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), FAPEMIG and CNPq for the scholarships.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical standards

The study was approved by the Committee on the Ethical Handling of Research Animals of Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) under protocol number 144/2020. Additionally, it was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of UFMG under protocol number CAAE-66026117.3.0000.5149. Healthy subjects and VL patients received a copy of the study policy, which was reviewed by a separate person. They signed an informed consent form in Portuguese before blood collection. The procedures were followed in compliance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or the National Research Committee, as well as with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

Abdellahi, L, Iraji, F, Mahmoudabadi, A and Hejazi, SH (2022) Vaccination in leishmaniasis: a review article. Iran Biomedical Journal 26, 135.Google ScholarPubMed
Agallou, M, Margaroni, M and Karagouni, E (2023) Intramuscular immunization with a liposomal multi-epitope chimeric protein induces strong cellular immune responses against visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccines 11, 1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbari, M, Oryan, A and Hatam, G (2021) Immunotherapy in treatment of leishmaniasis. Immunology Letters 233, 8086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avishek, K, Beg, MA, Vats, K, Singh, AK, Dey, R, Singh, KP, Singh, RK, Gannavaram, S, Ramesh, V, Mulla, MSA, Bhatnagar, U, Singh, S, Nakhasi, HL, Salotra, P and Selvapandiyan, A (2024) Manufacturing and preclinical toxicity of GLP grade gene deleted attenuated Leishmania donovani parasite vaccine. Scientific Reports 14, 14636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaska, S, Fotakis, EA, Chaskopoulou, A and Vontas, J (2021) Chemical control and insecticide resistance status of sand fly vectors worldwide. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, e0009586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basmenj, ER, Arastonejad, M, Mamizadeh, M, Alem, M, KhalatbariLimaki, M, Ghiabi, S, Khamesipour, A, Majidiani, H, Shams, M and Irannejad, H (2023) Engineering and design of promising T-cell-based multi-epitope vaccine candidates against leishmaniasis. Scientific Report 13, 19421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharjee, M, Banerjee, M and Mukherjee, A (2023) In silico designing of a novel polyvalent multi-subunit peptide vaccine leveraging cross-immunity against human visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis: an immunoinformatics-based approach. Journal of Molecular Modeling 29, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, R, Ruiz, J, Cardoso, J, Ostolin, T, Reis, L, Mathias, F, Aguiar-Soares, R, Roatt, B, Corrêa-Oliveira, R, Resende, D and Reis, AB (2020) Chimeric vaccines designed by immunoinformatics-activated polyfunctional and memory T cells that trigger protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccines 8, 252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, RN, Tanner, S, Runk, JV and Hoyos, J (2024) Looking through the lens of social science approaches: a scoping review of leishmaniases and Chagas disease research. Acta Tropica 249, 107059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burza, S, Croft, SL and Boelaert, M (2018) Leishmaniasis. Lancet 392, 951970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabral, H and Kataoka, K (2014) Progress of drug-loaded polymeric micelles into clinical studies. Journal of Controlled Release 190, 465476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrión, J, Nieto, A, Iborra, S, Iniesta, V, Soto, M, Folgueira, C, Abanades, DR, Requena, JM and Alonso, C (2006) Immunohistological features of visceral leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunology 28, 173183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clímaco, MC, Figueiredo, LA, Lucas, RC, Pinheiro, GRG, Magalhães, LMD, Oliveira, ALG, Almeida, RM, Barbosa, FS, Bartholomeu, DC, Bueno, LL, Mendes, TA, Zhan, B, Jones, KM, Hotez, P, Bottazzi, ME, Oliveira, FMS and Fujiwara, RT (2023) Development of chimeric protein as a multivalent vaccine for human kinetoplastid infections: Chagas disease and leishmaniasis. Vaccine 41, 54005411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coelho, EA, Tavares, CA, Carvalho, FA, Chaves, KF, Teixeira, KN, Rodrigues, RC, Charest, H, Matlashewski, G, Gazzinelli, RT and Fernandes, AP (2003) Immune responses induced by the Leishmania (Leishmania) donovani A2 antigen, but not by the LACK antigen, are protective against experimental Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis infection. Infection and Immunity 71, 39883994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coler, RN, Duthie, MS, Hofmeyer, KA, Guderian, J, Jayashankar, L, Vergara, J, Rolf, T, Misquith, A, Laurance, JD, Raman, VS, Bailor, HR, Cauwelaert, ND, Reed, SJ, Vallur, A, Favila, M, Orr, MT, Ashman, J, Ghosh, P, Mondal, D and Reed, SG (2015) From mouse to man: safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of a candidate leishmaniasis vaccine LEISH-F3+GLA-SE. Clinical Translation Immunology 4, e35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, A, Asad, M, Sabur, A, Didwania, N and Ali, N (2018) Monophosphoryl lipid A based cationic liposome facilitates vaccine induced expansion of polyfunctional T cell immune responses against visceral leishmaniasis. ACS Applied BioMaterials 1, 9991018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, DS, Ribeiro, PAF, Martins, VT, Lage, DP, Costa, LE, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Ramos, FF, Santos, TTO, Ludolf, F, Oliveira, JS, Mendes, TAO, Silva, ES, Galdino, AS, Duarte, MC, Roatt, BM, Menezes-Souza, D, Teixeira, AL and Coelho, EAF (2018) Vaccination with a CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell epitopes-based recombinant chimeric protein derived from Leishmania infantum proteins confers protective immunity against visceral leishmaniasis. Translational Research 200, 1834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, MC, Lage, DP, Martins, VT, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Roatt, BM, Menezes-Souza, D, Goulart, LR, Soto, M, Tavares, CA and Coelho, EA (2016) Recent updates and perspectives on approaches for the development of vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 49, 398407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmahallawy, EK, Alkhaldi, AAM and Saleh, AA (2021) Host immune response against leishmaniasis and parasite persistence strategies: a review and assessment of recent research. Biomedical and Pharmacotherapy 139, 111671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerick, SO, Carvalho, TV, Miranda, BM, Carneiro-da-Silva, A, Martins, TVF, Oliveira, LL and Marques-da-Silva, EA (2021) Lipophosphoglycan-3 protein from Leishmania infantum chagasi plus saponin adjuvant: a new promising vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine 39, 282291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erber, AC, Sandler, PJ, Avelar, DM, Swoboda, I, Cota, G and Walochnik, J (2022) Diagnosis of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasite and Vectors 15, 34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiuza, JA, Gannavaram, S, Santiago Hda, C, Selvapandiyan, A, Souza, DM, Passos, LS, de Mendonça, LZ, Lemos-Giunchetti Dda, S, Ricci, ND, Bartholomeu, DC, Giunchetti, RC, Bueno, LL, Correa-Oliveira, R, Nakhasi, HL and Fujiwara, RT (2015) Vaccination using live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites induces protection in dogs against Leishmania infantum. Vaccine 33, 280288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freitas, CS, Lage, DP, Machado, AS, Vale, DL, Martins, VT, Cardoso, JMO, Oliveira-Da-Silva, JA, Reis, TAR, Tavares, GSV, Ramos, FF, Ludolf, F, Pereira, IAG, Bandeira, RS, Fujiwara, RT, Bueno, LL, Roatt, BM, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA and Coelho, EAF (2023) Exploring drug repositioning for leishmaniasis treatment: Ivermectin plus polymeric micelles induce immunological response and protection against tegumentary leishmaniasis. Cytokine 164, 156143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Castro, A, Egui, A, Thomas, MC and López, MC (2022) Humoral and cellular immune response in asymptomatic dogs with visceral leishmaniasis: a review. Vaccines 10, 947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gasteiger, E, Gattiker, A, Hoogland, C, Ivanyi, I, Appel, RD and Bairoch, A (2005) ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 31, 37843788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germanó, MJ, Mackern-Oberti, JP, Vitório, JG, Duarte, MC, Pimenta, DC, Sanchez, MV, Bruna, FA, Lozano, ES, Fernandes, AP and Cargnelutti, DE (2022) Identification of immunodominant antigens from a first-generation vaccine against cutaneous leishmaniasis. Frontiers in Immunology 13, 825007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, J, Huang, F, Zhang, J, Chen, H, Chen, Q, Zhang, J, Li, J, Zheng, Z, Chen, D and Chen, J (2019) DNA prime-protein boost vaccine encoding HLA-A2, HLA-A24 and HLA-DR1 restricted epitopes of CaNA2 against visceral leishmaniasis. Immunology 156, 94108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeogu, NM, Akaluka, GN, Edechi, CA, Salako, ES, Onyilagha, C, Barazandeh, AF and Uzonna, JE (2020) Leishmania immunity: advancing immunotherapy and vaccine development. Microorganisms 8, 1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, P, Kumar, P, Shrivastava, A, Dar, MA, Lokhande, KB, Singh, N, Singh, A, Velayutham, R and Mandal, D (2023) Immunoinformatics-based multi-epitope containing fused polypeptide vaccine design against visceral leishmaniasis with high immunogenicity and TLR binding. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 253, 127567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumari, P, Mamud, A and Jha, AN (2023) Review on the drug intolerance and vaccine development for the leishmaniasis. Current Drug Targets 24, 10231031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushwaha, V and Capalash, N (2023) Evaluation of immunomodulatory potential of recombinant histidyl-tRNA synthetase (rLdHisRS) protein of Leishmania donovani as a vaccine candidate against visceral leishmaniasis. Acta Tropica 241, 106867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lage, DP, Ribeiro, PAF, Dias, DS, Mendonça, DVC, Ramos, FF, Carvalho, LM, Oliveira, D, Steiner, BT, Martins, VT, Perin, L, Machado, AS, Santos, TTO, Tavares, GSV, Oliveira-da-Silva, JA, Oliveira, JS, Roatt, BM, Machado-de-Ávila, RA, Teixeira, AL, Humbert, MV, Coelho, EAF and Christodoulides, M (2020) A candidate vaccine for human visceral leishmaniasis based on a specific T cell epitope-containing chimeric protein protects mice against Leishmania infantum infection. NPJ Vaccines 5, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lage, DP, Vale, DL, Linhares, FP, Freitas, CS, Machado, AS, Cardoso, JMO, Oliveira, D, Galvani, NC, Oliveira, MP, Oliveira-da-Silva, JA, Ramos, FF, Tavares, GSV, Ludolf, F, Bandeira, RS, Pereira, IAG, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Roatt, BM, Machado-de-Ávila, RA, Christodoulides, M, Coelho, EAF and Martins, VT (2022) A recombinant chimeric protein-based vaccine containing T-cell epitopes from amastigote proteins and combined with distinct adjuvants, induces immunogenicity and protection against Leishmania infantum infection. Vaccines 10, 1146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lage, DP, Martins, VT, Vale, DL, Freitas, CS, Pimenta, BL, Moreira, GJL, Ramos, FF, Pereira, IAG, Bandeira, RS, Jesus, MM, Ludolf, F, Tavares, GSV, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Roatt, BM, Christodoulides, M and Coelho, EAF (2023) The association between rLiHyp1 protein plus adjuvant and amphotericin B is an effective immunotherapy against visceral leishmaniasis in mice. Acta Tropica 246, 106986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C, Heinemann, J, Schleicher, U, Schett, G, Bogdan, C, Bozec, A and Soulat, D (2023) Chronic systemic infection of mice with Leishmania infantum leads to increased bone mass. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 38, 86102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, J, Enssle, KH, Lehmann, I, Emmendörfer, A and Lohmann-Matthes, ML (2000) The capacity to produce IFN-gamma rather than the presence of interleukin-4 determines the resistance and the degree of susceptibility to Leishmania donovani infection in mice. Journal of Interferon Cytokine Research 20, 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Rutte, EA, Coffeng, LE, Malvolti, S, Kaye, PM and Vlas, SJ (2020) The potential impact of human visceral leishmaniasis vaccines on population incidence. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0008468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, R, Hao, Y, Pan, W, Wang, W and Min, Y (2023) Monophosphoryl lipid A-assembled nanovaccines enhance tumor immunotherapy. Acta Biomaterials 171, 482494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, AS, Lage, DP, Vale, DL, Freitas, CS, Linhares, FP, Cardoso, JMO, Oliveira-da-Silva, JA, Pereira, IAG, Ramos, FF, Tavares, GSV, Ludolf, F, Bandeira, RS, Maia, LGN, Menezes-Souza, D, Duarte, MC, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Roatt, BM, Christodoulides, M, Martins, VT and Coelho, EAF (2022a) Leishmania LiHyC protein is immunogenic and induces protection against visceral leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunology 44, e12921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, AS, Lage, DP, Vale, DL, Freitas, CS, Linhares, FP, Cardoso, J, Pereira, L, Ramos, FF, Tavares, G, Ludolf, F, Oliveira-Da-Silva, JA, Bandeira, RS, Simões, AC, Duarte, MC, Oliveira, JS, Christodoulides, M, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Roatt, BM, Martins, VT and Coelho, EAF (2022b) A recombinant Leishmania amastigote-specific protein, rLiHyG, with adjuvants, protects against infection with Leishmania infantum. Acta Tropica 230, 106412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendonça, DVC, Martins, VT, Lage, DP, Dias, DS, Ribeiro, PAF, Carvalho, AMRS, Dias, ALT, Miyazaki, CK, Menezes-Souza, D, Roatt, BM, Tavares, CAP, Barichello, JM, Duarte, MC and Coelho, EAF (2018) Comparing the therapeutic efficacy of different amphotericin B-carrying delivery systems against visceral leishmaniasis. Experimental Parasitology 186, 2435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montaner-Angoiti, E and Llobat, L (2023) Is leishmaniasis the new emerging zoonosis in the world? Veterinary Research Communications 47, 17771799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ojha, R, Chand, K, Vellingiri, B and Prajapati, VK (2023) Cloning, expression and in vitro validation of chimeric multi-epitope vaccine candidate against visceral leishmaniasis infection. Life Sciences 323, 121689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira-da-Silva, JA, Machado, AS, Ramos, FF, Tavares, GSV, Lage, DP, Mendonça, DVC, Pereira, IAG, Santos, TTO, Martins, VT, Carvalho, LM, Freitas, CS, Ludolf, F, Reis, TAR, Bandeira, RS, Silva, AM, Costa, LE, Oliveira, JS, Duarte, MC, Roatt, BM, Teixeira, AL and Coelho, EAF (2020) A Leishmania amastigote-specific hypothetical protein evaluated as recombinant protein plus Th1 adjuvant or DNA plasmid-based vaccine to protect against visceral leishmaniasis. Cellular Immunology 356, 104194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, DM, Costa, MA, Chavez-Fumagalli, MA, Valadares, DG, Duarte, MC, Costa, LE, Martins, VT, Gomes, RF, Melo, MN, Soto, M, Tavares, CA and Coelho, EA (2012) Evaluation of parasitological and immunological parameters of Leishmania chagasi infection in BALB/c mice using different doses and routes of inoculation of parasites. Parasitology Research 110, 12771285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostolin, TLVDP, Gusmão, MR, Mathias, FAS, Cardoso, JMO, Roatt, BM, Aguiar-Soares, RDO, Ruiz, JC, Resende, DM, Brito, RCF and Reis, AB (2021) A chimeric vaccine combined with adjuvant system induces immunogenicity and protection against visceral leishmaniasis in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 39, 27552763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellosi, DS, Moret, F, Fraix, A, Marino, N, Maiolino, S, Gaio, E, Hioka, N, Reddi, E, Sortino, S and Quaglia, F (2016) Pluronic® P123/F127 mixed micelles delivering sorafenib and its combination with verteporfin in cancer cells. International Journal of Nanomedicine 11, 44794494.Google ScholarPubMed
Queiroz, AC, Barbosa, G, Oliveira, VRT, Alves, H, Alves, MAM, Carregaro, V, Silva, JS, Barreiro, EJ, Alexandre-Moreira, MS and Lima, LM (2022) Pre-clinical evaluation of LASSBio-1491: from in vitro pharmacokinetic study to in vivo leishmanicidal activity. PLoS ONE 17, e0269447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratnapriya, S, Keerti, , Sahasrabuddhe, AA and Dube, A (2019) Visceral leishmaniasis: an overview of vaccine adjuvants and their applications. Vaccine 37, 35053519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratnapriya, S, Keerti, , Yadav, NK, Dube, A and Sahasrabuddhe, AA (2021) A chimera of Th1 stimulatory proteins of Leishmania donovani offers moderate immunotherapeutic efficacy with a Th1-inclined immune response against visceral leishmaniasis. BioMed Research International 2021, 8845826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reche, PA and Reinherz, EL (2007) Prediction of peptide-MHC binding using profiles. Methods in Molecular Biology 409, 185200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, D, Demartino, S, Anjuère, F, Ferrua, B, Fragaki, K, Le Fichoux, Y and Kubar, J (2001) Sustained parasite burden in the spleen of Leishmania infantum-infected BALB/c mice is accompanied by expression of MCP-1 transcripts and lack of protection against challenge. European Cytokine Network 12, 340347.Google ScholarPubMed
Sachdeva, R, Banerjea, AC, Malla, N and Dubey, ML (2009) Immunogenicity and efficacy of single antigen Gp63, polytope and polytopeHSP70 DNA vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in experimental mouse model. PLoS ONE 4, e7880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saha, S and Raghava, GPS (2006) Prediction of continuous B-cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network. Proteins 65, 4048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, TTO, Machado, AS, Ramos, FF, Oliveira-da-Silva, JA, Lage, DP, Tavares, GSV, Mendonça, DVC, Cardoso, MS, Siqueira, WF, Martins, VT, Ludolf, F, Reis, TAR, Carvalho, LM, Freitas, CS, Bandeira, RS, Silva, AM, Oliveira, JS, Moreira, RLF, Fujiwara, RT, Roatt, BM, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Humbert, MV, Teixeira, AL and Coelho, EAF (2021) Leishmania eukaryotic elongation factor-1 beta protein is immunogenic and induces parasitological protection in mice against Leishmania infantum infection. Microbial Pathogenesis 151, 104745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srivastava, S, Shankar, P, Mishra, J and Singh, S (2016) Possibilities and challenges for developing a successful vaccine for leishmaniasis. Parasite and Vectors 9, 277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suman, SS, Amit, A, Singh, KP, Gupta, P, Equbal, A, Kumari, A, Topno, RK, Ravidas, V, Pandey, K, Bimal, S, Das, P and Ali, V (2018) Cytosolic tryparedoxin of Leishmania donovani modulates host immune response in visceral leishmaniasis. Cytokine 108, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tandon, R, Reyaz, E, Roshanara, , Jadhav, M, Gandhi, M, Dey, R, Salotra, P, Nakhasi, HL and Selvapandiyan, A (2023) Identification of protein biomarkers of attenuation and immunogenicity of centrin or p27 gene deleted live vaccine candidates of Leishmania against visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitology International 92, 102661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toepp, AJ and Petersen, CA (2020) The balancing act: immunology of leishmaniosis. Research in Veterinary Science 130, 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, MM, Chitarra, CS, Nakazato, L, Almeida, AB and Sousa, VR (2016) Nephrin gene expression in chronic kidney disease of dogs with Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum chagasi. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases 20, 516517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vakili, B, Nezafat, N, Zare, B, Erfani, N, Akbari, M, Ghasemi, Y, Rahbar, MR and Hatam, GR (2020) A new multi-epitope peptide vaccine induces immune responses and protection against Leishmania infantum in BALB/c mice. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 209, 6979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, DL, Dias, DS, Machado, AS, Ribeiro, PAF, Lage, DP, Costa, LE, Steiner, BT, Tavares, GSV, Ramos, FF, Martínez-Rodrigo, A, Chávez-Fumagalli, MA, Caligiorne, RB, Magalhães-Soares, DF, Silveira, JAG, Machado-de-Ávila, RA, Teixeira, AL and Coelho, EAF (2019) Diagnostic evaluation of the amastin protein from Leishmania infantum in canine and human visceral leishmaniasis and immunogenicity in human cells derived from patients and healthy controls. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 95, 134143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Haren, SD, Ganapathi, L, Bergelson, I, Dowling, DJ, Banks, M, Samuels, RC, Reed, SG, Marshall, JD and Levy, O (2016) In vitro cytokine induction by TLR-activating vaccine adjuvants in human blood varies by age and adjuvant. Cytokine 83, 99109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viana, KF, Fiuza, JA, Gannavaram, S, Dey, R, Selvapandiyan, A, Bartholomeu, DC, da Silveira-Lemos, D, Bueno, LL, Dutra, WO, Fujiwara, RT, Nakhasi, HL and Giunchetti, RC (2016) Application of rapid in vitro co-culture system of macrophages and T-cell subsets to assess the immunogenicity of dogs vaccinated with live attenuated Leishmania donovani centrin deleted parasites (LdCen-/-). Parasites & Vectors 9, 250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO Leishmaniasis (2024) (accessed on 25 March 2024). Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/leishmaniasis#tab=tab_1Google Scholar
Yadav, S, Prakash, J, Singh, OP, Gedda, MR, Chauhan, SB, Sundar, S and Dubey, VK (2021) IFN-gamma(+) CD4(+)T cell-driven prophylactic potential of recombinant LDBPK_252400 hypothetical protein of Leishmania donovani against visceral leishmaniasis. Cellular Immunology 361, 104272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Alignment of T-cell epitopes used for the construction of the chimeric protein. Ten T-cell epitopes predicted from amino acid sequences of SUZ42449.1, AYU81901.1, SUZ46653.1, AYU83765.1 and AYU80416.1 proteins were linearly grouped with a spacing of 2 glycine and 1 lysine residues between them. The 3-dimensional structure provided by Uniprot server is presented in the first upper part of the figure. At the bottom, the protein is linearly showed with details of its secondary structure, which was provided by the jPred server, indicating the presence of alpha helices and beta sheets.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Cytokine production before and after L. infantum infection. Mice (n = 16 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, animals (n = 8 per group) were euthanized and spleens were collected. Splenocytes (5 × 106 per well) were cultured in DMEM either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively), for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and levels of IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-4 and IL-10 were measured through a capture ELISA (A). The others (n = 8 per group) were infected and, 45 days post-challenge, they were euthanized and spleens were collected and used in the same procedure. Results obtained in the cytokine levels are shown (B). Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic and MPLA groups (P < 0.0001). (+) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the rCHI, rCHI/Mic and rCHI/MPLA groups (P < 0.01).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Nitrite production and IFN-γ mRNA expression after infection. Mice spleens (n = 8 per group) were collected on the 45th day after infection, and splenocytes (5 × 106 per well) were cultured in DMEM and either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively), for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and used to evaluate the rCHI- and SLA-specific nitrite production by Griess reaction (in A). In addition, stimulated cell cultures were used to extract RNA content, which was employed to evaluate the IFN-γ mRNA expression through RT-qPCR (in B). Relative gene expression is shown as 2^ − ΔΔCT. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Flow cytometry analysis of T cells using spleen of L. infantum-infected mice. BALB/c mice were immunized and later challenged with L. infantum promastigotes. Forty-five days post-infection, spleens were collected and spleen cells were either left unstimulated (control) or stimulated with SLA (25 μg mL−1) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. The frequency (in terms of percentage) of T-cell producers of cytokines was obtained and values were used to calculate ratios between SLA-stimulated (SC) vs unstimulated (control, CC) cell cultures, which were presented as indexes. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. (**) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline and Mic groups. (***) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic and MPLA groups. The connecting line indicates significant difference (P < 0.05) between the rCHI/MPLA and rCHI/Mic groups.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Humoral response before and after L. infantum infection. Mice (n = 16 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, blood samples from 8 animals per group were collected. The other mice (n = 8 per group) were infected and, 45 days post-challenge, their blood samples were collected. In both cases, blood was used to obtain serum and quantify the levels of anti-SLA and anti-rCHI IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies. The optical density (OD) values were obtained and used to calculate the ratios between the IgG2a/IgG1 levels, before (A and B) and after (C and D) challenge infection. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 5

Figure 6. In vivo toxicity after L. infantum infection. The organic toxicity was evaluated in sera samples collected from infected animals (n = 8 per group). Levels of creatinine, urea, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured using commercial kits. Samples collected from non-infected and non-vaccinated (naive) mice were used as control. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Parasite burden estimated through a limiting dilution assay. Mice (n = 8 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last dose, they were challenged with L. infantum promastigotes; and 45 days post-challenge, spleens, livers, bone marrows (BMs) and draining lymph nodes (dLNs) were used to evaluate the parasite load through limiting dilution assay. Results were expressed as the negative log of the titre adjusted per milligram of organ. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Splenic parasitism evaluated through qPCR. Mice (n = 8 per group) received saline or were immunized with MPLA, micelles (Mic), rCHI, rCHI/MPLA or rCHI/Mic. Thirty days after the last vaccine dose, they were challenged with L. infantum promastigotes; and 45 days post-challenge, spleens were used to evaluate the parasite load through qPCR. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Immunogenicity induced by rCHI and SLA in human cell cultures. PBMCs (107 cells per well) obtained from healthy subjects (n = 6) and VL patients (n = 6), those collected before and 6 months after their treatment, were either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 and 25 μg mL−1, respectively) for 5 days at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Culture supernatant was collected and IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 levels were measured through a capture ELISA. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the unstimulated control (medium) or after SLA stimulus (P < 0.0001). (+) indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the stimulus using the rCHI protein (P < 0.0001).

Figure 9

Figure 10. In vitro proliferative response induced by rCHI and SLA stimulation. The in vitro cell proliferation was evaluated in spleen cell cultures of infected animals (n = 8, per group). Cells (106 per well) were incubated in complete RPMI 1640 medium and either left unstimulated (medium) or stimulated with rCHI or SLA (10 μg mL−1, each) for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. MTT was added to the cultures and the OD values read in a microplate reader at 570 nm. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test was performed to evaluate statistically significant differences. Bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation of the groups. (*) indicates significant difference in relation to the saline, Mic, MPLA and rCHI groups (P < 0.0001).

Supplementary material: File

Lage et al. supplementary material 1

Lage et al. supplementary material
Download Lage et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 264.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Lage et al. supplementary material 2

Lage et al. supplementary material
Download Lage et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 20.8 KB