Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:50:05.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential risk factors for bovine Neospora caninum infection in Germany are not under the control of the farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2004

G. SCHARES ,
A. BÄRWALD ,
C. STAUBACH ,
M. ZILLER ,
D. KLÖSS ,
R. SCHRÖDER ,
R. LABOHM ,
K. DRÄGER ,
W. FASEN  and
R. G. HESS
...Show all authors
G. SCHARES
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
A. BÄRWALD
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
C. STAUBACH
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
M. ZILLER
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
D. KLÖSS
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
R. SCHRÖDER
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
R. LABOHM
Affiliation:
Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Blücherstrasse 34, 56074 Koblenz, Germany
K. DRÄGER
Affiliation:
Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Blücherstrasse 34, 56074 Koblenz, Germany
W. FASEN
Affiliation:
Landeskontrollverband Rheinland-Pfalz e.V., Burgenlandstrasse 7, 55543 Bad Kreuznach, Germany
R. G. HESS
Affiliation:
Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Blücherstrasse 34, 56074 Koblenz, Germany
F. J. CONRATHS
Affiliation:
Institute of Epidemiology, Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate, herds were identified that were likely to have a Neospora caninum sero-prevalence [ges ]10% by using a bulk milk ELISA. Individual herd data were obtained by a questionnaire. Univariate logistic regression showed that bulk milk positive farms had a significantly higher chance to report an increased abortion rate than negative farms (PWald<0·1). The chance to have a bulk milk positive herd increased with the minimum number of years a farm had reported an increased abortion rate (PWald<0·1). Questionnaire data, population and dog density as well as climatic data specific for the farm localization were used to identify potential risk factors for a herd to have acquired N. caninum infections. Within an optimized multiple logistic regression model ‘Number of farm dogs’, ‘Herd size’, and factors related to the municipality the farm was localized, i.e. ‘Mean temperature in July’, and ‘Dog density’ were significant risk factors (PWald<0·1). The present study underlines the role farm dogs have in the epidemiology of neosporosis. In addition, it suggests that the risk a herd has to acquire N. caninum infections is also associated with factors related to the farm location, i.e. factors that are largely out of the control of farmers.

Keywords

Neospora caninumrisk factorbovine abortionlogistic regressionclimatedog density
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ANDERSON, M. L., REYNOLDS, J. P., ROWE, J. D., SVERLOW, K. W., PACKHAM, A. E., BARR, B. C. & CONRAD, P. A. ( 1997). Evidence of vertical transmission of Neospora sp. infection in dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 210, 1169–1172.Google Scholar
BARLING, K. S., McNEILL, J. W., PASCHAL, J. C., McCOLLUM, F. T., CRAIG, T. M., ADAMS, L. G. & THOMPSON, J. A. ( 2001). Ranch-management factors associated with antibody seropositivity for Neospora caninum in consignments of beef calves in Texas, USA. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARTELS, C. J. M., WOUDA, W. & SCHUKKEN, Y. H. ( 1999). Risk factors for Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in the Netherlands (1995 to 1997). Theriogenology 52, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERGLER, K. G., ERBER, M. & BOCH, J. ( 1980). Untersuchungen zur Überlebensfähigkeit von Sporozysten bzw. Oozysten von Sarcocystis, Toxoplasma, Hammondia und Eimeria unter Labor- und Freilandbedingungen. Berliner und Münchner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 93, 288–293.Google Scholar
BJÖRKMAN, C., JOHANSSON, O., STENLUND, S., HOLMDAHL, O. J. M. & UGGLA, A. ( 1996). Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208, 1441–1444.Google Scholar
BJÖRKMAN, C., McALLISTER, M. M., FRÖSSLING, J., NÄSLUND, K., LEUNG, F. & UGGLA, A. ( 2003). Application of the Neospora caninum IgG avidity ELISA in assessment of chronic reproductive losses after an outbreak of neosporosis in a herd of beef cattle. Journal Veterinary Diagnostic Investigations 15, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIJKSTRA, T., BARKEMA, H. W., EYSKER, M., HESSELINK, J. W. & WOUDA, W. ( 2002 a). Natural transmission routes of Neospora caninum between farm dogs and cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 105, 99–104.Google Scholar
DIJKSTRA, T., BARKEMA, H. W., HESSELINK, J. W. & WOUDA, W. ( 2002 b). Point source exposure of cattle to Neospora caninum consistent with periods of common housing and feeding and related to the introduction of a dog. Veterinary Parasitology 105, 89–98.Google Scholar
DUBEY, J. P. & LINDSAY, D. S. ( 1996). A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis. Veterinary Parasitology 67, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FISCHER, I., FURRER, K., AUDIGE, L., FRITSCHE, A., GIGER, T., GOTTSTEIN, B. & SAGER, H. ( 2003). Von der Bedeutung der bovinen Neosporose beim Abortgeschehen in der Schweiz. Schweizerisches Archiv für Tierheilkunde 145, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HÄSSIG, M. & GOTTSTEIN, B. ( 2002). Epidemiological investigations of abortions due to Neospora caninum on Swiss dairy farms. Veterinary Record 150, 538–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEYDORN, A. O. & MEHLHORN, H. ( 2002). Neospora caninum is an invalid species name: an evaluation of facts and statements. Parasitology Research 88, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JENKINS, M. C., CAVER, J. A., BJÖRKMAN, C., ANDERSON, T. C., ROMAND, S., VINYARD, B., UGGLA, A., THULLIEZ, P. & DUBEY, J. P. ( 2000). Serological investigation of an outbreak of Neospora caninum-associated abortion in a dairy herd in southeastern United States. Veterinary Parasitology 94, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAINAR-JAIME, R. C., THURMOND, M. C., BERZALHERRANZ, B. & HIETALA, S. K. ( 1999). Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and abortion in dairy cows in northern Spain. Veterinary Record 145, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McALLISTER, M. M., BJÖRKMAN, C., ANDERSON-SPRECHER, R. & ROGERS, D. G. ( 2000). Evidence of point-source exposure to Neospora caninum and protective immunity in a herd of beef cows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217, 881–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McALLISTER, M. M., DUBEY, J. P., LINDSAY, D. S., JOLLEY, W. R., WILLS, R. A. & McGUIRE, A. M. ( 1998). Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 1473–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÜLLER-WESTERMEIER, G. ( 1990). Klimadaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zeitraum 1951–1980. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main, Germany.
MÜLLER-WESTERMEIER, G. ( 1995). Numerisches Verfahren zur Erstellung klimatologischer Karten. In Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes Nr. 193. Offenbach am Main, Germany.
OULD-AMROUCHE, A., KLEIN, F., OSDOIT, C., MOHAMMED, H. O., TOURATIER, A., SANAA, M. & MIALOT, J. P. ( 1999). Estimation of Neospora caninum seroprevalence in dairy cattle from Normandy, France. Veterinary Research 30, 531–538.Google Scholar
PARÉ, J., FECTEAU, G., FORTIN, M. & MARSOLAIS, G. ( 1998). Seroepidemiologic study of Neospora caninum in dairy herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 213, 1595.Google Scholar
RODRIGUEZ, I., CHOROMANSKI, L., RODGERS, S. J. & WEINSTOCK, D. ( 2002). Survey of Neospora caninum antibodies in dairy and beef cattle from five regions of the United States. Veterinary Therapeutics 3, 396–401.Google Scholar
SCHARES, G., BÄRWALD, A., STAUBACH, C., SÖNDGEN, P., RAUSER, M., SCHRÖDER, R., PETERS, M., WURM, R., SELHORST, T. & CONRATHS, F. J. ( 2002 a). p38-avidity-ELISA: examination of herds experiencing epidemic or endemic Neospora caninum-associated bovine abortion. Veterinary Parasitology 106, 293–305.Google Scholar
SCHARES, G., BÄRWALD, A., STAUBACH, C., ZILLER, M., KLÖSS, D., WURM, R., RAUSER, M., LABOHM, R., DRÄGER, K., FASEN, W., HESS, R. G. & CONRATHS, F. J. ( 2003). Regional distribution of bovine Neospora caninum infection in the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate modelled by logistic regression. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1631–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHARES, G., HEYDORN, A. O., CÜPPERS, A., MEHLHORN, H., GEUE, L., PETERS, M. & CONRATHS, F. J. ( 2002 b). In contrast to dogs, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) did not shed Neospora caninum upon feeding of intermediate host tissues. Parasitology Research 88, 44–52.Google Scholar
SCHARES, G., PETERS, M., WURM, R., BÄRWALD, A. & CONRATHS, F. J. ( 1998). The efficiency of vertical transmission of Neospora caninum in dairy cattle analysed by serological techniques. Veterinary Parasitology 80, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHARES, G., RAUSER, M., SÖNDGEN, P., REHBERG, P., BÄRWALD, A., DUBEY, J. P., EDELHOFER, R. & CONRATHS, F. J. ( 2000). Use of purified tachyzoite surface antigen p38 in an ELISA to diagnose bovine neosporosis. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 1123–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STENLUND, S., KINDAHL, H., UGGLA, A. & BJOERKMAN, C. ( 2003). A long-term study of Neospora caninum infection in a Swedish dairy herd. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 44, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THURMOND, M. C. & HIETALA, S. K. ( 1997). Effect of congenitally acquired Neospora caninum infection on risk of abortion and subsequent abortions in dairy cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 58, 1381–1385.Google Scholar
THURMOND, M. C., HIETALA, S. K. & BLANCHARD, P. C. ( 1997). Herd-based diagnosis of Neospora caninum-induced endemic and epidemic abortion in cows and evidence for congenital and postnatal transmission. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigations 9, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VENABLES, W. N. & RIPLEY, B. D. ( 1999). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York.CrossRef
WOUDA, W., MOEN, A. R. & SCHUKKEN, Y. H. ( 1998). Abortion risk in progeny of cows after a Neospora caninum epidemic. Theriogenology 49, 1311–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar