Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:36:35.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phagocytosis and killing of Trypanosoma dionisii by human neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kareen J. I. Thorne
Affiliation:
Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts' Causeway, Cambridge CB1 4RN
Audrey M. Glauert
Affiliation:
Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts' Causeway, Cambridge CB1 4RN
Rosamund J. Svvennsen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PQ
David Franks
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PQ

Summary

The cell-mediated resistance of human leucocytes to Trypanosoma dionisii, a bat parasite related to T. cruzi, was investigated. Human peripheral blood neutrophils and monocytes were cytotoxic to T. dionisii as assessed by electron microscopy and by induction of 99mTc release from trypanosomes pre-labelled with [99mTc]pertechnetate. The enhancement of cytotoxicity by specific antiserum varied considerably from one individual to another. Neither blood lymphocytes nor blood eosinophils induced 99mTc release from T. dionisii. The trypanosomes were readily phagocytosed by neutrophils and monocytes even in the absence of added antiserum but the rate was enhanced when antiserum was present. Eosinophils also phagocytosed T. dionisii but only in the presence of antiserum. Investigation by electron microscopy revealed that T. dionisii is rapidly destroyed in the phagocytic vacuole of neutrophils and monocytes and by eosinophils. Phagocytosis, ultrastructural damage and induction of 99mTc release occurred more rapidly in neutrophils than in monocytes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamson, I. A. & Da Silva, W. D. (1977). Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against T. cruzi. Parasitology 75, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. R. (1976). Species of the subgenus Schizotrypanum other than Trypanosoma cruzi and their potential usefulness in the laboratory. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 126–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J. R., Green, S. M., Chaloner, L. A. & Gaborak, M. (1972). Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) dionisii of Pipistrellus pipstrellus (Chiroptera): intra- and extra-cellular development in vitro. Parasitology 65, 251–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. R. & Liston, A. J. (1978). Trypanosoma (schizotrypanum) dionisii: effect of various agents on attachment and entry to macrophages in vitro and on morphogenesis. Journal of General Microbiology 104, 7989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J. R., Liston, A. J. & Selden, L. F. (1976). Trypomastigote dimorphism and satellite deoxyribonucleic acid in a clone of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) dionisii. Journal of General Microbiology 97, 113–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. R. & Selden, L. F. (1978). Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) dionisii: influence of mouse peritoneal macrophages and calf sera on extracellular growth in vitro at 37°C. Journal of General Microbiology 106, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, D., Kelly, M. & Sanderson, C. J. (1975). Inhibition of xenogeneie cell-mediated cytotoxicity in the rat by antiglobulin serum. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 48, 621–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, R. (1975). Killing in vitro of Trypanosoma cruzi by macrophages from mice immunized with T. cruzi or BCG, and absence of cross-immunity on challenge in vivo. Journal of Experimental Medicine 142, 299311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierszenbaum, F., Knecht, E., Budzko, D. B. & Pizzimenti, M. C. (1974). Phagocytosis: a defense mechanism against infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Immunology 112, 1839–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kress, Y., Bloom, B. R., Wittner, M., Rowen, A. & Tanowitz, H. (1975). Resistance of Trypanosoma cruzi to killing by macrophages. Nature, London 257, 394–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kress, Y., Tanowitz, H., Bloom, B. & Wittner, M. (1977). Trypanosoma cruzi: infection of normal and activated mouse macrophages. Experimental Parasitology 41, 385–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liston, A. J. & Baker, J. R. (1978). Entry of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) dionisii into macrophages in vitro and its subsequent fate therein. Journal of General Microbiology 107, 253–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mkwananzi, J. B., Franks, D. & Baker, J. R. (1976). Cytotoxicity of antibody-coated trypanosomes by normal human lymphoid cells. Nature, London 259, 403–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nogueira, N. & Cohn, Z. (1976). Trypanosoma cruzi: mechanisms of entry and intracellular fate in mammalian cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine 143, 1402–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nogueira, N. & Cohn, Z. A. (1978). Trypanosoma cruzi: in vitro induction of macrophage microbicidal activity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 148, 288300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nogueira, N., Gordon, S. & Cohn, Z. (1977). Trypanosoma cruzi: modification of macrophage function during infection. Journal of Experimental Medicine 146, 157–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, C. J., Lopez, A. F. & Moreno, M. B. B. (1977). Eosinophils and not lymphoid K cells kill Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Nature, London 268, 340–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, C. M. (1972). Human lymphoblastoid cell lines. III. Co-cultivation techniques for establishment of new lines. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 48, 623–8.Google Scholar
Thorne, K. J. I., Svvennsen, R. J. & Franks, D. (1978). Role of hydrogen peroxide arid peroxidase in the cytotoxicity of Trypanosoma dionisii by human granulocytes. Infection and Immunity 21, 798805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadas, M. A., David, J. R., Butterworth, A. E., Pisani, N. T. & Siongok, T. A. (1979). A new method for the purification of human eosinophils and neutrophils, and a comparison of the ability of these cells to damage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Immunology 122, 1228–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar