Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:00:35.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Penetration gland secretion by hexacanths of Hymenolepis diminuta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. C. Lethbridge
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX
M. F. Gijsbers
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7HX

Extract

The rate of expulsion of penetration gland material was determined from photomicrographs of Hymenolepis diminuta hexacanths stained with neutral red dye at intervals after hatching in vitro. Identical secretory rates were recorded for hexacanths incubated in either Tyrode's solution or Tyrode's solution plus an extract of the midgut of Tenebrio molitor. In both media the reduction in stained material observed in the glands after 135 min incubations was equivalent to that observed for hexacanths that had had opportunity to penetrate in vivo during the same time period. These results were interpreted as indicating that the in vivo secretory pattern was similar to that observed in vitro, and that chemical stimuli from the tissue extracts were not required to initiate secretion. Microdensitometric readings also demonstrated a quantitative decrease in dye within the glands as incubation time increased. Ultrastructural examination of the glands showed that their secretory inclusions were exported via ducts to the epithelial cytoplasm where they accumulated in discrete blebs enclosed by the surface membrane. These inclusion-filled, membrane-bounded blebs were apparently formed and released continuously until, after approximately 2 h, only a few inclusions remained in the penetration glands.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Collin, W. K., (1968). Electron microscope studies of the muscle and hook systems of hatched oncospheres of Hymenolepis citelli McLeod, 1933 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Journal of Parasitology 54, 7488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collin, W. K., (1969). The cellular organization of hatched oncospheres of Hymenolepis citelli (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Journal of Parasitology 55, 149–66.Google Scholar
Collin, W. K., (1970). Electron microscopy of postembryonic stages of the tapeworm, Hymenolepis citelli. Journal of Parasitology 56, 1159–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Florey, E., (1966). An Introduction to General and Comparative Animal Physiology. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Jamieson, J. D., & Palade, G. E., (1967 a). Intracellular transport of secretory proteins in the pancreatic exocrine cell. I. The role of the peripheral elements of the Golgi complex. Journal of Cell Biology 34, 577–96.Google Scholar
Jamieson, J. D., & Palade, G. E., (1967 b). Intracellular transport of secretory proteins in the pancreatic exocrine cell. II. Transport to condensing vacuoles and zymogen granules. Journal of Cell Biology 34, 597615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. L., (1966). The structure and composition of the helminth cuticle. Advances in Parasitology 4, 187254.Google Scholar
Lethbridge, R. C., (1971 a). The hatching of Hymenolepis diminuta eggs and penetration of the hexacanths in Tenebrio molitor beetles. Parasitology 62, 445–56.Google Scholar
Lethbridge, R. C., (1971 b). An improved gradient centrifugation technique for the separation of Hymenolepis diminuta eggs from rat faeces. Journal of Parasitology 57, 1140–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millonig, G., (1961). Advantages of a phosphate buffer for osmium tetroxide solutions in fixation. Journal of Applied Physics 32, 1637.Google Scholar
Nieland, M. L., (1968). Electron microscope observations on the egg of Taenia taeniaformis. Journal of Parasitology 54, 957–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pence, D. B., (1967). The fine structure and histochemistry of the infective eggs of Dipylidium canium. Journal of Parasitology 53, 1041–54.Google Scholar
Pence, D. B., (1970). Electron microscope and histochemical studies on the eggs of Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 56, 8497.Google Scholar
Reid, W. M., (1948). Penetration glands in cyclophyllidean cestodes. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 67, 177–82.Google Scholar
Reynolds, E. S., (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 17, 208–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybicka, K., (1967). Embryogenesis in Hymenolepis diminuta. V. Acetylcholinesterase in embryos. Experimental Parasitology 20, 263–6.Google Scholar
Rybicka, K., (1973). Ultrastructure of the embryonic syncytial epithelium in a cestode Hymenolepis diminuta. Parasitology 66, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawada, I., (1961). Penetration glands in the oncosphere of Raillietina cesticillus. Experimental Parasitology 11, 141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, P. H., & Maneely, R. B., (1955). Studies on the biology of some tapeworms of the genus Taenia. III. The role of the secreting gland of the hexacanth embryo in the penetration of the intestinal mucosa of the intermediate host, and some of its histochemical reactions. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 49, 326–30.Google Scholar
Swiderski, Z., (1972). La structure fine de l'oncosphere du cestode Catenotaenia pusilla (Goeze, 1782) (Cyclophyllidea, Catenotaeniidae). La Cellule 69, 207–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. R., & Baker, R. J., (1968). The Cultivation of Parasites in vitro. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Watson, M. L., (1958). Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 4, 475–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. A., Pullin, R., & Denison, J., (1971). An investigation of the mechanism of infection by digenetic trematodes: The penetration of the miracidium of Fasciola hepatica into its snail host Lymnaea truncatula. Parasitology 63, 491506.Google Scholar