Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:52:20.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PCR-based DNA fingerprinting of Giardia duodenalis isolates using the intergenic rDNA spacer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

R. M. HOPKINS
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasite Infections and State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
C. C. CONSTANTINE
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasite Infections and State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
D. A. GROTH
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102
J. D. WETHERALL
Affiliation:
School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia, 6102
J. A. REYNOLDSON
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasite Infections and State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
R. C. A. THOMPSON
Affiliation:
WHO Collaborating Centre for the Molecular Epidemiology of Parasite Infections and State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia

Abstract

The potential for the non-coding intergenic rDNA spacer (IGS) to DNA fingerprint Giardia duodenalis isolates was investigated. Conserved PCR primers, specific for the flanking large and small rDNA genes, were used to amplify the IGS from 52 in vitro-cultured Giardia isolates. Four distinct IGS–PCR size groups (1·35–1–6 kb) were observed, which correlated closely with the major genetic assemblages established previously for the same isolates using isoenzyme analysis. IGS–PCR size groups A (1·42 kb), C (1·4 kb) and D (1·35 kb) corresponded to isoenzyme assemblage A, and IGS–PCR group B (1·6 kb) to isoenzyme assemblage B. Amplified products from IGS–PCR size groups A and B, which contained 50/52 isolates, were subsequently digested with 8 different restriction enzymes and their profiles compared. Analysis separated isolates within each IGS–PCR size group into 2 distinct clusters which correlated almost exactly with the same genetic groups established previously using isoenzyme electrophoresis. Within each cluster, both methods exhibited a similar capacity to distinguish between Giardia genotypes although they established different genetic relationships between individual isolates. Much of the variability associated with the IGS was attributed to isolates harbouring multiple IGS- sequence types. Restriction analysis of IGS–PCR products amplified from cloned and parent lines of a human isolate BAH 39, which contains multiple IGS variants, showed that trophozoite populations are homogeneous with respect to the types of IGS-variants they maintain. Furthermore, in vitro culture of the cloned isolate BAH39c9 over a 6-year period also failed to reveal variation in IGS–PCR digestion profiles. These results suggest that IGS–PCR RFLP profiles are inherently stable. IGS–PCR analysis was successfully applied to 11 Giardia cyst samples highlighting the potential for this approach to genotype Giardia isolates without the need for in vitro culture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)