Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:52:55.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimized conditions for the in vitro excystment of Calicophoron daubneyi metacercariae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

Kathryn M. Huson ,
Charlotte Wild ,
Caroline Fenn  and
Mark W. Robinson
Kathryn M. Huson
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland
Charlotte Wild
Affiliation:
Ridgeway Research Ltd., Park Farm Buildings, Park Lane, St. Briavels, Gloucestershire, England
Caroline Fenn
Affiliation:
Ridgeway Research Ltd., Park Farm Buildings, Park Lane, St. Briavels, Gloucestershire, England
Mark W. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: Mark W. Robinson, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paramphistomosis, caused by Calicophoron daubneyi, is an emerging infection of ruminants throughout Western Europe. Despite its prevalence, many questions remain regarding the basic biology of this parasite and how it interacts with its host. Consequently, there is a need to develop methods to study C. daubneyi in vitro to improve our understanding of rumen fluke biology. Towards this, we aimed to identify a suitable protocol for in vitro excystment of C. daubneyi metacercariae. Six methods that have been used to excyst metacercariae from a number of trematode species were tested with C. daubneyi metacercariae. Three of these achieved an average of >50% excystment whilst one method, which included an acid-pepsin treatment, incubation in reducing conditions and an alkaline/bile salt solution to activate the larvae, consistently gave >80% excystment. The latter protocol also showed no detrimental effect on the motility of newly excysted juvenile (NEJ) parasites when observed for up to 24 h in RPMI 1640 medium post-excystment. The successful production of C. daubneyi NEJs in vitro is a significant step forward, and will enable the discovery of infective stage-specific parasite antigens and facilitate drug screening trials, to aid the development of much needed diagnostic and therapeutic options for paramphistomosis.

Keywords

Calicophoron daubneyiExcystmentMetacercariaeParamphistome
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 145 , Issue 8 , July 2018 , pp. 1015 - 1019
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arias, MSS, Sanchís, J, Francisco, I, Francisco, R, Piñeiro, P, Cazapal-Monteiro, C, Cortiñas, FJJ, Suárez, JLL, Sánchez-Andrade, R, Paz-Silva, A, Sanchis, J, Francisco, I, Francisco, R, Pineiro, P, Cazapal-Monteiro, C, Cortinas, FJ, Suarez, JL, Sanchez-Andrade, R and Paz-Silva, A (2013) The efficacy of four anthelmintics against Calicophoron daubneyi in naturally infected dairy cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 197, 126–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, HS and LeFlore, WB (1984) In vitro excystment of the metacercaria of Acanthoparyphium spinulosum (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 51, 149–153.Google Scholar
Dixon, KE (1966) The physiology of excystment of the metacercaria of Fasciola hepatica L. Parasitology 56, 431.Google Scholar
Ferreras, MC, González-Lanza, C, Pérez, V, Fuertes, M, Benavides, J, Mezo, M, González-Warleta, M, Giráldez, J, Martínez-Ibeas, AM, Delgado, L, Fernández, M and Manga-González, MY (2014) Calicophoron daubneyi (Paramphistomidae) in slaughtered cattle in Castilla y León (Spain). Veterinary Parasitology 199, 268–271.Google Scholar
Foster, AP, Otter, A, O'Sullivan, T, Cranwell, MP, Twomey, DF, Millar, MF and Taylor, MA (2008) Rumen fluke (paramphistomosis) in British cattle. Veterinary Record 162, 528–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, B, Robbins, SH and Nelson, PD (1978) In vivo and in vitro excystation of Zygocotyle lunata (Trematoda) metacercariae and histochemical observations on the cyst. The Journal of parasitology 64, 395–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, DK, Roberts, LCP, Lean, N, Zadoks, RN, Sargison, ND and Skuce, PJ (2013) Identification of the rumen fluke, Calicophoron daubneyi, in GB livestock: possible implications for liver fluke diagnosis. Veterinary Parasitology 195, 65–71.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø, Harper, DATAT and Ryan, PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Huesca-guillén, A, Ibarra-Velarde, F and Sánchez-González, MG (2007) Paramphistomum spp.: improved artificial excystment and in vitro culture of immature and adult stages. Parasitology Research 102, 41–45.Google Scholar
Huson, KM, Oliver, NAM and Robinson, MW (2017) Paramphistomosis of ruminants: an emerging parasitic disease in Europe. Trends in Parasitology 33, 836–844Google Scholar
Jones, RA, Brophy, PM, Mitchell, ES and Williams, HW (2017) Rumen fluke (Calicophoron daubneyi) on Welsh farms: prevalence, risk factors and observations on co-infection with Fasciola hepatica. Parasitology 144, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeFlore, WB and Bass, HS (1983) In vitro excystment of the metacercariae of Cloacitrema michiganensis (Trematoda: Philophthalmidae). The Journal of Parasitology 69, 200–204.Google Scholar
Li, S, Chung, YB, Chung, BS, Choi, MH, Yu, JT and Hong, ST (2004) The involvement of the cysteine proteases of Clonorchis sinensis metacercariae in excystment. Parasitology Research 93, 36–40.Google Scholar
Malrait, K, Verschave, S, Skuce, P, Van Loo, H, Vercruysse, J and Charlier, J (2015) Novel insights into the pathogenic importance, diagnosis and treatment of the rumen fluke (Calicophoron daubneyi) in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 207, 134–139.Google Scholar
Martinez-Ibeas, AM, Munita, MP, Lawlor, K, Sekiya, M, Mulcahy, G and Sayers, R (2016) Rumen fluke in Irish sheep: prevalence, risk factors and molecular identification of two paramphistome species. BMC Veterinary Research 12, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, C, Stevenson, H, Cox, A and Dick, I (2012) Disease associated with immature paramphistome infection in sheep. Veterinary Record 170, 343–344.Google Scholar
McCusker, P, McVeigh, P, Rathinasamy, V, Toet, H, McCammick, E, O'Connor, A, Marks, NJ, Mousley, A, Brennan, GP, Halton, DW, Spithill, TW and Maule, AG (2016) Stimulating neoblast-like cell proliferation in juvenile Fasciola hepatica supports growth and progression towards the adult phenotype in vitro. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, 1–26.Google Scholar
McGonigle, L, Mousley, A, Marks, NJ, Brennan, GP, Dalton, JP, Spithill, TW, Day, TA and Maule, AG (2008) The silencing of cysteine proteases in Fasciola hepatica newly excysted juveniles using RNA interference reduces gut penetration. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metheny, NA, Stewart, BJ, Smith, L, Yan, H, Diebold, M and Clouse, RE (1997) Ph and concentrations of pepsin and trypsin in feeding tube aspirates as predictors of tube placement. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 21, 279–285.Google Scholar
Millar, M, Colloff, A and Scholes, S (2012) Disease associated with immature paramphistome infection. Veterinary Record 171, 509–510.Google ScholarPubMed
Nagar, G, Raina, OK, Varghese, A, Kumar, N, Samanta, S, Prasad, A, Gupta, SC, Banerjee, PS, Singh, BP, Rao, JR, Tewari, AK, Paul, S, Jayraw, AK, Chandra, D and Garg, R (2010) In vitro excystment of Fasciola gigantica metacercariae. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 24, 169–171.Google Scholar
Panic, G, Ingram, K and Keiser, J (2013) Development of an in vitro drug sensitivity assay based on newly excysted larvae of Echinostoma caproni. Parasites & Vectors 6, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavan Kumar, C, Syaama Sundar, N and Devi Prasad, V (2016) Outbreak of immature paramphistomosis in nellore jodipi sheep. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 40, 533–535.Google Scholar
Robinson, MW, Menon, R, Donnelly, SM, Dalton, JP and Ranganathan, S (2009) An integrated transcriptomics and proteomics analysis of the secretome of the helminth pathogen Fasciola hepatica: proteins associated with invasion and infection of the mammalian hos. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 8, 1891–1907.Google Scholar
Rojo-Vázquez, FA, Meana, A, Valcárcel, F and Martínez-Valladares, M (2012) Update on trematode infections in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 189, 15–38.Google Scholar
Sanabria, REF and Romero, JR (2008) Review and update of paramphistomosis. Helminthologia 45, 64–68.Google Scholar
Schroeder, DJ, Johnson, AD and Mohammad, KH (1981) In vitro excystment of the black spot trematode Neascus pyriformis Chandler, 1951 (Trematoda: Diplostomatidae). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 48, 184–189.Google Scholar
Toolan, DP, Mitchell, G, Searle, K, Sheehan, M, Skuce, PJ and Zadoks, RN (2015) Bovine and ovine rumen fluke in Ireland—prevalence, risk factors and species identity based on passive veterinary surveillance and abattoir findings. Veterinary Parasitology 212, 168–174.Google Scholar