Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:59:35.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The oncomiracidia of the monocotylid monogeneans Dictyocotyle coeliaca and Calicotyle kroyeri

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. C. Kearn
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich

Extract

The eggs of D. coeliaca have been cultured successfully and the free-swimming larva has been studied for the first time. The eggs have an incubation period which for monogeneans is exceptionally long (4–5 months at 10 °C). Apart from maintenance at a low temperature no other special conditions such as high hydrostatic pressure or washing to remove host body fluid are necessary for development. It is not necessary for the eggs to come into contact with host body fluid before development can begin.

The oncomiracidium of D. coeliaca has no eyes, a well-developed pair of anterior median gland cells and a pair of hamuli. The oncomiracidium of C. kroyeri is similar to that of D. coeliaca except for the presence of two pairs of conspicuous pigmented eyes, poorly developed anterior median gland cells, the presence of an extra pair of gland cells at the posterior end of the body and the absence of hamuli.

A comparison of the larval features of D. coeliaca and C. kroyeri has confirmed that these parasites belong to quite distinct species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Armstrong, F. A. J. & Butler, E.I. (1960). Chemical changes in sea water off Plymouth in 1958. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 39, 299302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawbs, B. & Griffiths, I. (1958). The enigmatical trematode Dictyocotyle coeliaca. Nature, London 182, 1033–4.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. & Griffiths, I. (1959). Relationship between Dictyocotyle and Calicotyle. Nature, London 183, 835–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euzet, L. (1957). La larve gyrodactyloide nageante de Calicotyle kroyeri Diesing, 1850 (Trematoda-Monogenea). Annales de parasitologie humaine et comparée 32, 197–9.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. C. & Kille, R. A. (1950). Some observations on Dictyocotyle coeliaca Nybelin, 1941 (Monogenea). Journal of Helminthology 24, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1963 a). The life cycle of the monogenean Entobdella soleae, a skin parasite of the common sole. Parasitology 53, 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1963 b). The egg, oncomiracidium and larval development of Entobdella soleae, a monogenean skin parasite of the common sole. Parasitology 53, 435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1968). The larval development of Merizocotyle sp., a monocotylid monogenean from the nasal fossae of Raia undulata. Parasitology 58, 921–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1959). Relationship between Dictyocotyle and Calicotyle. Nature, London 183, 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. & Green, J. E. (1957). The occurrence at Plymouth of Dictyocotyle coeliaca Nybelin, 1941 (Trematoda-Monogenea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 36, 77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. H. (1965). Observations on the occurrence of Dictyocotyle coeliaca and Calicotyle kroyeri (Trematoda-Monogenea). Parasitology 55, 201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1968). The hatching mechanism of the egg of Fasciola hepatica L. Parasitology 58, 7989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed