Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:41:03.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Two New Tapeworms from the Ostrich, with a Key to the Species of Davainea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. J. Meggitt
F. J. Meggitt
Affiliation:
Assistant Helminthologist, University of Birmingham. (From the Research Department in Agricultural Zoology, University of Birmingham.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The material which forms the basis of the following account consists of two tubes of tapeworms collected from ostriches at the Veterinary Pathological Laboratory, Nairobi, British East Africa. One tube contained approximately 12 scolices and the anterior portions of the strobilae attached to them, together with several fragments of the more posterior portions: these are described under the name Davainea beddardi n. sp. The other tube contained one large fragment of a Davainea and several smaller pieces but no scolices: these are described under the heading Davainea sp. For this material I am indebted to Professor G. H. F. Nuttall, F.R.S. to whom I wish here to express my thanks. I have also to acknowledge my indebtedness to the Librarian of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons for allowing me to consult literature unobtainable elsewhere.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1921 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

Ackert, J. E. (1918). On the life-cycle of the fowl cestode Davainea cesticillus (Molin). Journ. Parasitol. v. 41–43.Google Scholar
Ackert, J. E. (1919). On the life-history of Davainea tetragona (Molin), a fowl tapeworm. Journ. Parasitol. vi. 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akashi, S. (1916). (Davainea formosana nov. sp. a new tapeworm reported from Formosa and Tokyo. Taiwan Ig. Zassi, No. 167.) Abstr. in Trop. Dis. Bull. 1917, x. 123, and China Med. Journ. 1917, XXXI. 166.Google Scholar
Baczynska, H. (1914). Études anatomiques et histologiques sur quelques nouvelles espèces de cestodes d'oiseaux. Bull. Soc. Sci. Nat. Neuchâtel, xl. 187–239.Google Scholar
Beddard, F. E. (1914). XIV. On a new species of Rhabdometra, and on the parauterine organ in Otiditaenia. Proc. Zool. Soc. 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddard, F. E. (1915). XVIII. On Taenia struthionis (Parona) and allied forms. Proc. Zool. Soc. 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1891 a). Notices helminthologiques (2). Mém. Soc. zool. France, iv. 420–489.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1891 b). Note sur quelques vers parasitiques de l'homme. C. R. soc. biol. iii. 604–615.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1894). Notices sur les parasites de l'homme. 3me série. Sur le Krabbea grandis et remarques sur la classification des Bothriocéphalines. C. R. soc. biol. sér. 10, i. 699–702.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1897). Le Davainea madagascariensis à Guyane. Bull. Acad. Med. xxxvii. 34.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1899 a). Un cas inédit de Davainea madagascariensis, considérations sur le genre Davainea. Arch. Parasitol. ii. 200–217.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. (1899 b). Sur deux Téniades récemment déscrits par M. Mégnin: Davainea guevillensis et Taenia lagenocollis. Arch. Parasitol. ii. 144.Google Scholar
Bourquin, (1906). Un nouveau Taenia (Davainea) chez les Prosimiens. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xli. 222.Google Scholar
Chevreau, P. (1891). Le Taenia madagascariensis. Bull. soc. méd. de l'île Maurice, ix. 523.Google Scholar
Clerc, W. (1906). Notes sur les Cestodes d'oiseaux de l'Oural II. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xiii. 713–730.Google Scholar
Cohn, L. (1900). Zur Kenntnis einiger Vögeltänien. Zool. Anz. xxiii. 91–98.Google Scholar
Crety, C. (1890). Cestodi della Coturnix communis Bonn. Boll. Mus. Zool. Anat. comp. Torino, v. No. 88.Google Scholar
Daniels, C. W. (1895). Taenia demerariensis. Brit. Guinea med. Ann. Hosp. Rep.Google Scholar
Daniels, C. W. (1896). Taenia demerariensis (?). Lancet, 1455.Google Scholar
Davaine, C. (1870). Mém. soc. biol. 5 sér. i. 233–240.Google Scholar
Davaine, C. (1877). Traité des Entozoaires. Paris.Google Scholar
Douthitt, A. (1915). Studies on the Cestode Family Anoplocephalidae. Ill. Biol. Mono. Univ. Ill. Urbana, i. No. 3.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1843). Mémoire sur les hehninthes des Musaraignes. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. xx. 329–349.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire des helminthes ou vers intestinaux. Paris.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1896). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vögeltänien II. Rev. Suisse Zool. iv. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1906). Die Hymenolepisarten der Vögel. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xli. 440–452.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1908). Die Cestoden der Vögel. Zool. Jahrb. Suppl. X.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1909 a). Neue Davaineiden. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xlix. 94–124.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1909 b). Die Cestoden der Vögel des weissen Nils. Results Swed. Zool. Exped. Egypt, Pt 3.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1911). Vögelcestoden der Arn-Inseln. Abh. Senck. Nat. Ges. xxiv. 251–266.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1912). Ergebnisse der mit Subvention aus der Erbschaft Treitl unternommenen zoologischen Forschungsreise Dr Franz Werner's nach dem äegyptischen Sudan und Nord-Uganda. XXI. Vögelcestoden. S. B. Kais. Akad. Wissen. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl. cxxi. 182–192.Google Scholar
Grenet, and Davaine, C. (1869). Note sur un nouveau espèce de Taenia recueilli à Mayotte. Mém. Soc. Biol. i. 233.Google Scholar
Grenet, and Davaine, C. (1870). Arch. Méd. Nav. xiii. 134.Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E. (1916 a). Studies on the transmission and prevention of Cestode infection in chickens. Journ. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 218–237.Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E. (1916 b). Morphology of adult and larval cestodes from poultry. Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc. xxxv. 23–44.Google Scholar
Holzberg, F. (1898). Der Geschlechtsapparat einiger Tänien aus der Gruppe Davainea Bl. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. f. Anat. xi. 153–192.Google Scholar
Houttouyn, (1773). In Linné's Natursystem von H. Müller, ii. 904.Google Scholar
Hungerbühler, M. (1910). Studien an Gyrocotyle und Cestoden. Jen. Denkschr. Med. Ges. xvi. 497–521.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. v. (1902). Über zwei neue Arten des Genus Davainea. Arch. Parasitol. vi. 257–292.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. v. (1904). Zur Kenntnis einiger Säugetiercestoden. Zool. Anz. xxvii. 770–782.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. v. (1906). Studien an Säugetiercestoden. Zeit.f. wissen. Zool. lxxxi. 505–596.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1911). New species of Avian Cestodes. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. xxxvi. 58–80.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1912). Internal parasites recorded from Australian birds. Emu. xii. 105–112.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. (1914). Second report on the Cestoda and Acanthocephala collected in Queensland. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. viii. 106–112.Google Scholar
Klaptocz, B. (1908). Ergebnisse der mit Subvention aus der Erbschaft Treitl unternommenen zoologischen Forschungsreise Dr Franz Werner's nach Sudan und Nord Uganda. XIII. Vögelcestoden. S. B. Kais. Akad. Wissen. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl. cxvii. 259–298.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1869). Bidrag til Kundskab om Fuglenes Baendelorme. Dansk. Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. naturvid. math. Afd. (5), viii. 251–368.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1879). Cestodes ges. von A. P. Fedschenko auf seiner Beise in Turkestan. Verh. Ges. Freunde Natur. Moskau, xxxiv.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1882). Nye Bidrag til Kundskab om Fuglenes Baendelorme. Dansk. Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., naturvid. math. Afd. (6), i. 347–366.Google Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1891). Über Taenia (Dav.) madagascariensis Dav. Verhandl. Deutsch. Zool. Gesell. 68–71.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1893). Zur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tänien. Arch. f. Micros. Anat. xlii 442–459.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1894). Helminthologische Studien. Jen. Zeit. Naturwiss. xxviii. 328–342.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1901 a). Taenia asiatica, eine neue Tänie des Menschen. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xxix. 982–985.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1901 b). Entozoa des zoologischen Museums der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu St Petersburg. Bull. Acad. Imp. St Petersburg, xv. 271–292.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1904). Neue Helminthen aus Westafrika. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. xxxvi. 379–383.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1909). Davainea provinciates. Gentrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. lii. 75–77.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1910). Parasitische Plattwürmer. 11. Cestodes. In Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands, hgb. Prof. Brauer, Jena.Google Scholar
Magalhães, P. S. de (1898). Notes d'helminthologique brasilienne. 8. Deux nouveaux Ténias de la poule domestique. Arch. Parasitol. i. 442–451.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1916). A contribution to our knowledge of the tapeworms of fowls and of sparrows. Parasitol. viii. 390–410.Google Scholar
Mola, P. (1907 a). Di un nuovo cestode del genere Davainea Blanch. Biol. Centrbl. xxvii. 575–578.Google Scholar
Mola, P. (1907 b). Sopra Davainea circumvallata Krabbe. Zool. Anz. xxxii. 126–130.Google Scholar
Mola, P. (1912). Davaineapluriwncinata (Crety) è sinonima della D. circumvallata (Krabbe)? Arch. Parasitol. xv. 432–441.Google Scholar
Morell, A. (1895). Anatomisch-histologische Studien an Vogeltänien. Arch. Naturgesch. xvii. 81.Google Scholar
Neslobinsky, N. (1911). Zur Kenntnis der Vogeltänien Mittelrusslands. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. lvii. 436–442.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1885). Di alouni elminti raccolti nel Sudan orientale da O. Beccari et P. Magretti. Ann. Mus. Civ. Star. Nat. Genova, Ser. 2A, xxii. 424–445.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1898). Elminti raccolti dal Dott. Elio Modigliani alle isole Mentawei, Engano e Sumatra. Ann. Mus. Genova, Ser. 2A, xix. 102–124.Google Scholar
Parona, C. (1901). Vermi parassiti di Vertebrati. Spedizione al Buwenzori di S.A.R. il Principe Luigi Amedeo di Savoia. Parte Scientiflca. Milano, i. 415–422.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1893). Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole. 2 éd.Paris.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Lucet, A. (1892). Sur le Davainea proglottina Davaine. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, xvii. 105–106.Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1904). Notes on the spiny suckered tapeworms of chickens (Dav. echinobothrida [ = T. bothrioplitis] and T. tetragona). U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Anim. Ind. Bull. 60, 55–69.Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1905). The tapeworms of American chickens and turkeys. 21. Ann. Rep. Bur. Anim. Ind. 268–285.Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1909). The taenoid Cestodes of North American birds. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. lxix. 1–141.Google Scholar
Rátz, S. v. (1900). Wurmknötchen im Dünndarme. Zeit. f. Fleich. u. Milch-Hy. x. 230–233.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, K. A. (1808–1810). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalum historia naturalis. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, K. A. (1819). Entozoorum synopsis cui accedent mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi. Berlin.Google Scholar
Setti, E. (1893). Elminti dell' Eritrea. Genova.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1908). A cause of Appendicitis and other intestinal lesions in man and other vertebrates. Parasitol. i. 263–279.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1909). The Tape-Worms (Cestoda) of the Red Grouse (Lagopus scoticus). Proc. Zool. Soc. 351–363.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1909 b). Internal parasites of birds allied to the Grouse. Proc. Zool. Soc. 363–368.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. J. (1914 a). Beitrag zur Kenntnis einiger Vogelcestoden. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. lxxv. 59–83.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. J. (1914 b). Vogelcestoden aus Russisch Turkestan. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. f. Syst. xxxvii. 411–492.Google Scholar
Steudener, F. (1877). Untersuchungen über den feineren Bau der Cestoden. Abh. naturf. Ges. Halle, xiii. 281–316.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. W. W. (1916). Cestodes. In Animal Parasites of Man. London.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1895). Notes on Parasites. Vet. Mag. ii.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1896 a). A revision of the adult tapeworms of hares and of rabbits. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. xix. 145–235.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1896 b). Report upon the present knowledge of the tapeworms of poultry. U.S Dept. Agric. Bur. Anim. Ind. Bull. 12, 1–79.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1895). Notizie helminthologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Sci. Nat. Trieste, xvi. 35–46.Google Scholar
Sweet, G. (1910). Some new and unrecorded endoparasites from Australian chickens. Proc. R. Soc. Viet. n.s. xxiii. 242–256.Google Scholar
Vevers, G. M. (1920). Report on Entozoa collected from Animals which died in the Zoological Gardens of London during eight months of 1919–1920. Proc. Zool. Soc., 1920, 405–410.Google Scholar
Zilluf, H. (1912). Vergleichende Studien über die Musculatur des Skolex des Cestoden. Arch. f. Naturges. lxxviii. 1–33.Google Scholar
Zschokke, P. (1895). Davainea contorta sp. aus Manis pentadactyla L. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, xvii. 634–665.Google Scholar