Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:23:00.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the life-history and larval anatomy of Melinda cognata Meigen (Diptera Calliphorinae) parasitic in the snail Helicella (Heliomanes) virgata da Costa, with an account of the other Diptera living upon Molluscs1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. Keilin
D. Keilin
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, University of Cambridge.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper consists of two parts: (I) a complete account of the life-history and a description of early stages of Melinda cognata Meigen which I found here in Cambridge living as parasites on a common snail, Helicella virgata da Costa, and (II) a review of all observations made hitherto on the life-history of different flies feeding upon living or dead molluscs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 11 , Issue 3-4 , October 1919 , pp. 430 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J. M. (1915). The economic relations of the Sarcophagidae. Journ. of Economic Entom. VIII. 242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, J. M. (1916). Sarcophaga and Allies in North America. La Fayette, Indiana. Edited by The Thomas Say Foundation of the Entomological Society of America (see pp. 158–161).Google Scholar
Barnard, K. H. (1911). Chironomid larvae and Watersnails. Entom. Monthl. Mag. XLVII. 76–78.Google Scholar
Bergenstamm, J. von (1864). Ueber die Metamorphose von Discomyza incurva Fall. Verh. d. zool.-bot. Gesel. Wien, XIV. 713–716.Google Scholar
Böttcher, G. (1913). Die männlichen Begattungswerkzeuge bei dem Genus Sarcophaga Meig. und ihre Bedeutung für die Abgrenzung der Arten (Dipt.), Schluss. Deutsche Entom. Zeitschr. pp. 351–377 (see p. 367).Google Scholar
Bowell, E. W. (1917). Larva of a Dipterous Fly feeding on Helicella itala. Proceed. of the Malacol. Soc. of London, XII. 308.Google Scholar
Brues, Ch. T. (1903). Melanophora roralis, parasitic on an Isopod. Entom. News, XIV. 291.Google Scholar
Cholodkovsky, N. (1908). Ueber den weiblichen Geschlechtsapparat einiger viviparen Fliegen. Zool. Anzeig. XXXIII. 367–376.Google Scholar
Dufour, L. (1840). Recherches sur les métamorphoses du genre Phora, et description de deux espèces nouvelles de ces Diptères, avec figures. Mém. de la Soc. R. des Sc. de l'Agric. et des Arts de Lille, pp. 414–424, 21 fig.Google Scholar
Goureau, (1843). Note sur un Diptère dont la larve vit dans l'Helix conspurcata (Melanophora helicivora Goureau). Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr. 2me Série, I. 77–80.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. (1901). Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Calliphorinen (Dipt.). Wien. Ent. Zeitung, XX. 28–33.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1911). Recherches sur la morphologie larvaire des Diptères du genre Phora. Bull. Scient. de la France et Belgique, XLIV. 27–78, Pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1912). Phora maculata Mg. est-il parasite de Gelechia maculatella Hb. ? Feuilles de Jeunes Naturalistes, pp. 150–151.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1915 a). Recherches sur les larves de Diptères cyclorhaphes. Bull. Scient. de la France et Belgique, XLVII. 15–198, Pls. I–XVI.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1915 b). Sur la viviparité chez les Diptères et sur les larves des Diptères vivipares. Arch, de Zool. Exper. LV. 393–415.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1917). Recherches sur les Anthomyides à larves carnivores. Parasitology, IX. 325–450, Pls. V–XV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macquin-Tandon, A. (1855). Histoire naturelle des Mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de France. Paris: J. B. Ballière, II. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. H. (1897). Flesh-flies bred from snails. Ent. Month. Mag. 2nd ser. VII. 251.Google Scholar
Meijere, J. C. H. de (1912). Über die Metamorphose von Puliciphora und über neue Arten der Gattungen Puliciphora Dahl und Ctenocephalus Wandolleck. Zool. Jahrb. Supplement XV. 1 Band, pp. 142–154, Pl 4.Google Scholar
Mik, J. (1864). Phora bergenstammi n. sp. Verhandl. d. K. K. zool.-bot. Geselsch. Wien, XIV. 793.Google Scholar
Mik, J. (1890). Dipterologische Miscellen. Wien. Ent. Zeitung, IX. 153–158.Google Scholar
Morley, Cl. (1907). The Ichneumons of Great Britain, II.Google Scholar
Nielsen, I. C. (1909). Iagttagelser over Entoparasitiske Muscidelarver hos Arthropoder. Entomologiske Meddelser, 2 R., 4 Bd. pp. 1–126, Pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
Nielsen, I. C. (1917). A note on Helicobosca muscaria. Vidensk. Medd. fra Dansk. naturhist. Foren. LXVIII. pp. XIX–XXI.Google Scholar
Pavay-Vajna, F (1909). Onesia cognata als Vogelparasit. Aquila, Jahrg. XVI. pp. 288–290.Google Scholar
Perris, E. (1850). Histoire des Métamorphoses de quelques Diptères Sarcophaga muscaria Meig.; Lucina fasciata Meig.; Gymnopoda tomentosa Macq.; Opomyza gracilis Meig.; Chyliza atriseta Meig. Mém. de la Soc. Nation. des Sc. de l'Agric. et des Arts de Lille, pp. 118–133, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Portchinsky, J. (1887). Diptera europea et asiatica nova aut minus cognita (Cum notis biologicis), V. Hor. Soc. Ent. Ros. XXI. 3–20, Pl. I (see p. 17).Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, (1830). Essai sur les Myodaires. Mémoires présentées par divers savants à, l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France, X.Google Scholar
Rodhain, J. etBequaert, J. (1916). Matériaux pour une étude monographique des Diptères parasites de l'Afrique. Première partie: Histoire de Passeromyia heterochaeta Villen. et de Stasia (Cordylobia) Rodhani Ged. Bull. Sc. de la Fr. et Bel. 7e série, XLIX. 236–289, Pl. XIX.Google Scholar
Schiner, (1862). Fauna Austriaca (see I. 576).Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. (1908). Puparia van Phora spp. gewuld met Helix huisges. Tijdschr. v. Entomologie, LI. lvii–lviii.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. (1910). Zur Lebensweise von Helicobosca muscaria Mg. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Insektenbiologie, VI. 107–109.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. (1917). Biologische Beziehungen zwischen Dipteren und Schnecken. Biologisches Zentralblatt, XXXVII. 24–43.Google Scholar
Steep, E. (1901). Shell-Life. An Introduction to the British Mollusca. London.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. (1892). Description of a Sarcophaga bred from Helix. Psyche, VI. 220–221.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. (1902). Sur Onesia sepulchralis. Wien. Ent. Zeit. XXI. 25–27.Google Scholar
Wandolleck, B. (1898). Die Stethophagiden, eine neue flügel- und schwingerlose Familie der Diptera. Zool Jahrb., Abt. f. Syst. XL 412–439, Pls. 25–26.Google Scholar
Wulp Van der, (1869). Note on parasitism of Melanophora roralis L. in Asopia farinalis L. and of Cyrtoneura stabulans Fall, in Lophyrus pallidus Klug. Tijdschr. v. Ent. 2e ser. part 4, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar