Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:10:30.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the genus Eucampsipoda Kol. and Dipseliopoda n.g. (Nycteribiidae, Diptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

O. Theodor
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem

Extract

The genus Eucampsipoda was created by Kolenati in 1857 for Eucampsipoda hyrtlii, the common parasite of Rousettus aegyptiacus, and Nycteribia fitzingeri Kol., 1856, which he later considered as synonym with N. aegyptia Macquart, 1851. In his paper of 1863 Kolenati gives illustrations of E. hyrtlii, but not of E. aegyptia as he had in the meantime lost his specimens. Macquart's description does not permit the recognition of the species, and it is even doubtful whether he was dealing with an Eucampsipoda at all. Speiser (1901) adds only a few details to Kolenati's description of E. hyrtlii, but introduces an unfortunate complication by incorrectly identifying specimens from Burma and Sumatra as E. hyrtlii. Later (1908) Speiser identified specimens from the Comoro Islands as E. hyrtlii, but this record has also become doubtful, as will be shown later. Scott (1914) accepts Speiser's identification of the Indonesian material as E. hyrtlii, and describes and figures a female specimen from Ceylon as E. hyrtlii, which is in fact E. latisternum Schuurm. Stekh. Scott (1925) identified specimens from South Africa as E. hyrtlii which on re-exaniination proved to belong to a new species. He also mentions Madagascar as a locality for E. hyrtlii without giving details. The distribution of E. hyrtlii was thus apparently extremely wide, throughout Africa, from the Cape Province to Egypt and beyond into Palestine, Comoro Islands, Madagascar, Ceylon, Burma and Sumatra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ferris, G. F. (1924). Two Diptera pupipara from Philippine bats. Philipp. J. Sci. 24, 73.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1856). Die Parasiten der Chiropteren, Brünn.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1857). Synopsis prodroma der Nycteribien. Wien. ent. Monatschr. 1, 65.Google Scholar
Kolenati, F. A. (1863). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Phthirio-Myiarien. Hor. Soc. Ent. Ross. 2, 9.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, H. (1953). A new Nycteribiid (Diptera) from Nigeria. Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. 22, 59.Google Scholar
Schuurmans, Stekhoven J. H. & Hardenberg, D. J. F. (1939). Fledermausfliegen aus Niederländisch Ostindien. Capita zool. 8, 1.Google Scholar
Scott, H. (1914). On some Oriental Nycteribiidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 14, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, H. (1925). Zoogeographical and systematic notes on the Nycteribiidae of India, Ceylon and Burma. Rec. Indian Mus. 27, 351.Google Scholar
Speiser, P. (1901). Über die Nycteribien. Arch. Naturgesch. 67, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speiser, P. (1908). Die Diptera pupipara der madagassisih-maskarenisthen Region. Voelzkow, Reise in Ostafrika, 1903–5. vol. 2. Syst. Arb. Heft 3, p. 197.Google Scholar
Theodor, O. (1952). On the structure of the genitalia in the Nycteribiidae. Trans 9. Int. Congr. Ent. Amst. 2, 27.Google Scholar
Theodor, O. & Moscona, A. (1954). On bat parasites in Palestine. I. Nycteribiidae, Streblidae, Hemiptera, Siphonaptera. Parasitology, 44, 157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed