Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:58:20.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the natural enemies of Meligethes aeneus (F.) and M. viridescens (F.) [Coleoptera: Nitidulidae]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Philip Osborne
Philip Osborne
Affiliation:
Edinburgh and East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recorded parasites and predators of Meligethes aeneus (F.) and M. viridescens (F.) [Coleoptera: Nitidulidae] are given together with descriptions and illustrations, for the first time, of the post-embryonic stages of the hymenopterous parasites Diospilus capito (Nees) [Braconidae], Isurgus heterocerus (Thoms.) [Ichneumonidae], Isurgus sp. A, and Cryptoserphus parvulus (Nees) [Proctotrupidae]. The egg and first instar of Thersilochus sp. are described and figured, and a species of Zeteticontus mentioned. The antennae, propodea, and ovipositors of the two species of Isurgus are compared and the ovipositors of Diospilus capito, Isurgus sp. A, I. heterocerus and Thersilochus sp. are illustrated.

A protozoan (Gregarine), a larval mite and a nematode, none of which has been identified, are recorded inhabiting Meligethes adults.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 50 , Issue 1-2 , May 1960 , pp. 91 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

André, E. (1907). Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe, 10, 315. Paris.Google Scholar
Beirne, B. P. (1941). A consideration of the cephalic structure and spiracles of the final instar larvae of the Ichneumonidae (Hym.). Trans. Soc. Brit. Ent. 7, 123–90.Google Scholar
Bogdanov-Katkov, N. N. (1920). Petrograd Station for the Protection of Plants from Enemies, 14 pp. Petrograd.Google Scholar
Börner, C. (1942). The larvae of Meligethes aeneus F. and Ceuthorrhynchus leprieuri Bris. as alternate hosts of the hymenopterous parasite, Diospilus capito (Nees). Z. PflKrankh. 52, 107–13.Google Scholar
Börner, C. & Blunck, H. (1920). On the life history of Meligethes aeneus F. Mitt. biol. ZentAnst., Berl., no. 18, 15th Yearly Rep. pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
Brischke, C. G. A. (1880). Schr. naturf. Ges. Danzig, p. 193.Google Scholar
Cushman, R. A. (1916). Thersilochus conotracheli Riley, as a parasite of the Plum curculio. J. Agric. Res. 6, 847–54.Google Scholar
Faber, F., Fischer, G. & Kalt, B. (1920). Die Biologische Bedeutung des Rapsglanzkäfers für Raps, Rübsen und Senf. Beobachtungen und Versuche des Jahres 1919. Landw. Jb. 54, 681–701.Google Scholar
Feytaud, J. (1918). The weevils of the vine. Rev. Vitic., Paris, 47, 5–10.Google Scholar
Friederichs, K. (1921). Untersuchungen über den Rapsglanzkäfers in Mecklenburg. Z. angew. Ent. Berl. 7, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haliday, A. H. (1839). Hymenoptera Britannica (Oxyura), 1, 14. London.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1914). Serphidae (= Proctotrupidae) et Calliceratidae ( = Ceraphronidae). Tierreich, 42, 1–254 (see p. 36).Google Scholar
Laboulbene, A. (1877). Listes des éclosions d'insectes. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr., Paris, 5 Série, 7, 424.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1889). Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. 22, 203–4.Google Scholar
Mercet, R. G. (1921). Himenópteros, fam. Encírtidos. Trab. Mus. Cienc. nat. Madr. pp. 568–9.Google Scholar
Meuche, A. (1940). Investigations on the Rape flea beetle, Psylliodes chrysocephala in East Holstein. Z. angew. Ent. 27, 464–95.Google Scholar
Miles, H. W. (1927). The agricultural entomology of the Holland Division of Lincolnshire. Lincs. Nat. Un. Trans., Lincoln, pp. 129–48.Google Scholar
Morley, C. (1922). A synopsis of British Proctotrypidae (Oxyura). Entomologist, 55, 108.Google Scholar
Nees, , von Esenbeck, C. G. (1834). Monographiae Hymenopterorum. Stuttgartiae et Tubingae, 2, 360.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1938). Preliminary revision of British Proctotrupinae (Hym. Proctotrupoidea). Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 87, 464.Google Scholar
Oberstein, O. (1919). Über das Auftreten von Thersilochus Holmgr. als natürlicher Feind des Rapsglanzkäfers (Meligethes aeneus F.). Zbl. Bakt. (Abt. 2), 49, 91–2.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. (1955). The occurrence of five hymenopterous parasites of Meligethes aeneus (F.) and M. viridescens (F.) (Col. Nitidulidae). Ent. Mon. Mag. 91, 47.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. (1911). Opuscula Ichneumonologica, 4, 2106–9. Blankenburg.Google Scholar
Short, J. R. T. (1952). Morphology of the head of larval Hymenoptera with special reference to the head of Ichneumonoidea, including a classification of the final instar larvae of the Braconidae. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 103, 27–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestri, F. (1915). Descrizione di nuovi Imenotteri Calcididi africani. Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 9, 343.Google Scholar
Speyer, W. (1921). The cabbage leaf weevil, Ceuthorrhynchus leprieuri a. rubsaameni Kolbe. Mitt. biol. ZentAnst., Berl., 21, 189–94.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. & Krausse, A. (1926). Contribution to the knowledge of the biology of the pests of the oil-bearing crops, especially of the share in the damage by Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis falsely ascribed to Meligethes aeneus. Arch. Naturgesch. (Abt. A), 91, 1–45.Google Scholar