Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:06:01.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nuclear division in Entamoeba invadens Rodhain, 1934

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. C. Narasimhamurti
C. C. Narasimhamurti
Affiliation:
Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Examination of dividing trophozoites of E. invadens revealed that the peripheral granules did not contribute directly to the formation of chromosomes. Material for the chromosomes seemed to be derived from the karyosome and the perikaryosomal particles. No centrioles and spindle mechanism were noticed.

2. The nucleus showed Feulgen-positive material at all stages; in the interphase the reaction was faint because of the poor staining of the karyosome and widely dispersed perikaryosomal particles. The intensity of the staining reaction increased with the onset of division and continued so till late anaphase.

3. Nuclear division in the cyst was found to be different from that of the trophozoites and involved the formation of a typical spindle.

4. Karyosomes of the nuclei of the uni-, bi-, tetra-nucleate cysts were all positive to Feulgen staining.

5. Observations on amoebae undergoing cytokinesis showed that the process of division supports the amoeboid movement theory of cleavage put forward by Chalkley (1935, 1951).

Thanks are due to Dr P. Tate for constant guidance and encouragement during the course of this work and to Dr E. W. McConnachie for kindly giving the cultures and for critically reading through the manuscript. The work was carried out during the tenure of a Royal Society and Nuffield Foundation Commonwealth Bursary.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, D. C. & Deutsch, K. (1958). The chromatoid body of Entamoeba invadens. Exp. Cell. Res. 15, 604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalkley, H. W. (1935). The mechanism of cytoplasmic fission in Ameoba proteus. Protoplasmsa, 24, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalkley, H. W. (1951). Control of fission in Amoeba proteus as related to mechanism of cell division. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 51, 1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobell, C. (1909). Researches on the intestinal protozoa of frogs and toads. Quart. J. micr. Sci., 53, 201.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1919). The Amoebae Living in Man. London: John Bale, Sons and Danielsson.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. (1928). Researches on the intestinal protozoa of monkeys and man. I. General introduction. II. Description of whole life-history of Entamoeba histolytica in cultures. Parasitology, 20, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. & Laidlaw, P. P. (1926). On the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and some other entozoic amoebae. Parasitology, 18, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiman, Q. M. & Ratcliffe, H. L. (1936). Morphology and life cycle of an amoeba producing amoebiasis in reptiles. Parasitology, 28, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, R. A. (1950). An experimental study of Entamoeba muris (Grassi, 1879); its morphology, affinities and host-parasite relationship. Parasitology, 40, 343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, C. T. & Geiman, Q. M. (1955). Comparative studies of intestinal amebae. I. Distributions and cyclic changes of the nucleic acids in Endamoeba histolytica and Endamoeba coli. Amer. J. Hyg. 62, 66.Google ScholarPubMed
Ratcliffe, H. M. & Geiman, Q. M. (1933). Eleven cases of amoebiasis in reptiles. J. Parasit. 20, 139.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, H. M. & Geiman, Q. M. (1934). Amebiasis in reptiles. Science, 79, 324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodhain, J. (1934). Entamoeba invadens n.sp., parasite de serpents. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 117, 1195.Google Scholar
Swann, M. M. & Mitchison, J. M. (1958). The mechanism of cleavage in animal cells. Biol. Rev. 33, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenrich, D. H. (1940). Nuclear structure and nuclear division in the trophic stages of Entamoeba muris (Protozoa, Sarcodina). J. Morph. 66, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar