Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:48:12.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Taxonomy and Natural Relationships of Fleas, with descriptions of Four New Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. E. Ewing
H. E. Ewing
Affiliation:
Bureau of Entomology, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recently the writer has had occasion to go over and help arrange the United States National Museum collection of fleas. Although not as extensive as some of the other well-known flea collections, it is invaluable of the Philippines, and of Doctor Carrol Fox, Surgeon, United States Philippines, and of Doctor Carrol Fox, Surgeon, United States Public Health Service, Two of the foremost authorities on the Siphonaptera.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1924 , pp. 341 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dahl, F. (1898). Den Floh und seine Stellung im System. Gesells. natur. Freunde, pp. 185–199; Figs. 1–15.Google Scholar
Ewing, H. E. (1913). Some External Parasites of Poultry. Col. Bul. 92. Oreg. Agric. College, 16pp.; 12 figs.Google Scholar
Fox, C. (1908). Ceratophyllus niger n.sp. Ent. News, xix. 434–435.Google Scholar
Fox, C. (1914). Bulletin 97 of Hygienic Laboratory, U.S. Public Health Service. (Several papers on fleas.)Google Scholar
Jordan, K. and Rothschild, N. C. (1915). Contribution to our Knowledge of American Siphonaptera. Ectoparasites, i. 45–60; Figs. 48–64.Google Scholar
Jordan, K. and Rothschild, N. C. (1920). On American Bird-Ceratophylli. Ectoparasites i. 65–76; Figs. 65–72.Google Scholar
Martini, E. (1922). Die Eidonomie der Flöhe, als Beweis für ihre stammesgeschichtliche Herkunft. Centralb. f. Bakt., Par. u. Infektionskr. lxxxviii. 205–221; Figs. A u. B.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. (1896). Insects Affecting Domestic Animals. Bul. 5 (n.s.), U.S. Department Agriculture, 302 pp.; 170 figs.Google Scholar
Rothschild, N. C. (1915). On Neopsylla and Some Allied Genera of Siphonaptera. Ectoparasites, i. 30–44; Figs. 32–47.Google Scholar