Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:17:43.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the electron microscopy of the turnip yellow mosaic virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kenneth M. Smith
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Plant Virus Research Unit, Molteno Institute, Cambridge

Extract

An attempt to differentiate by means of the electron microscope between particles of the top and bottom components of the turnip yellow mosaic virus is described. Since the particles of the top component are thought to be hollow spheres, it might be expected that they would collapse after drying and thus throw a smaller shadow than the particles of the bottom component which are thought to have a more solid centre. No difference could be perceived between the two types of particle, so that the apparently hollow particles can withstand the effect of drying without collapsing.

Sections were cut of leaves of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis) and particles were observed inside the cells which could conceivably be virus particles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernal, J. D. & Carlisle, C. H. (1948). Unit cell measurement of wet and dry crystalline turnip yellow mosaic virus. Nature, Lond., 162, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markham, R. (1951). Physicochemical studies of the turnip yellow mosaic virus. Faraday Soc. Disc. 11, 221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, R. & Smith, , Kenneth, M. (1949). Studies on the virus of turnip yellow mosaic. Parasitology, 39, 330–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, , Kenneth, M. (1953). A note on the observation of viruses in the cells of infected plants. Biockim. Biophys. Acta, 10, 210–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed