Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:20:25.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nematodes from Australian waders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Patricia M. Mawson
Patricia M. Mawson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Adelaide
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Records are given of helminth infection found by the dissection of 122 waders belonging to 19 species, some migratory and some resident in Australia. In the examination of the nematodes from these, and some other hosts, the following species were identified and described: Capillaria triloba (Linst.) (Lobibyx novae-hollandiae, Himantopus leucocephalus, Recurvirostra novaehollandiae); Capillaria recurvirostrae sp.nov. (R. novaehollandiae); Amidostomum chevreuxi Seurat (H. leucocephalus); Porrocaecum lobibycis (L. novaehollandiae); Contracaecum spiculigerum (Rud.) (H. leucocephalus); Schistorophus longicornis (Hemp. & Ehr.), and Sciadiocara umbellifera (Molin) (Calidris canutus); Schistorophus limosae sp.nov. and Viktorocara limosae sp.nov. (Limosa lapponica); Viktorocara sp. (Calidris canutus); Echinuria heterobrachiata Wehr (Cladorhynchus leucocephalus, Charadrius alexandrinus, Erolia ruficollis); Chevreuxia australis Johnston & Mawson (Charadrius melanops); Skrjabinoclava horrida (Rud.) (Charadrius rubricollis, C. alexandrinus); Streptocara crassicauda (Creplin) (Ch. alexandrinus); Stello-caronema charadrii sp.nov. (Ch. cucullata); S. glareolae sp.nov. (Glareola isabella); Tetrameres nouveli (Seurat) (Him. leucocephalus, Ch. alexandrinus, Recurvirostra novaehollandiae); T. cladorhynchi sp.nov. (C. leucocephalus); T. calidris sp.nov. (C. canutus); T. lobibycis sp.nov. (L. novaehollandiae); T. scolopacidis sp.nov. (Erolia acuminata, E. ruficollis, Tringa glareola); Pseudaproctella sp. (Lobibyx miles).

I am particularly indebted to the Director, Dr Peter Crowcroft, and the staff of the South Australian Museum; without their help it would have been impossible to obtain many of the parasites. Some birds were presented by Mrs Joan Paton and some by Mr Max Waterman. Specimens from Limosa lapponica were lent by the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in Sydney, from Lobibyx novaehollandiae (from Queensland) by Dr John Pearson of the Department of Parasitology of the University of Queensland, and from Lobibyx miles from Dr M. J. Mackerras of the C.S.I.R.O., Division of Entomology, in Canberra. Mr Condon, Curator of Birds in the South Australian Museum, has helped with information on the habits and correct names of the birds, and my colleague, Dr S. J. Edmonds, with names of new species. I also wish to thank Dr W. G. Inglis of the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) who was good enough to read the paper.

The holotype and paratypes of Viktorocara limosae sp.nov. and Schistorophus limosae sp.nov. are in the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in Sydney. Other holotypes are in the South Australian Museum, and paratypes in the Helminthological Collection of the Zoology Department of the University of Adelaide.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 277 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akhtar, S. A. (1952). A redescription of the species of Schistorophus longicornis. Pakis. J. Sci. 4, 127–28.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C. (1957). Taxonomic studies on the genus Aproctella Cram, 1931, and Carinema Pereira and Vaz, 1933, with a proposal for a new genus Pseudaproctella n.g. Can. J. Zool. 35, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C. & Chabaud, A. G. (1959). Remarques sur la classification des Splendido-filariinae. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 24, 53–63.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1929). Parasitic Nematoda and Acanthocephala collected in 1925–1927. ‘Discovery’ Rep. 1, 541–60.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1939). Further records of parasitic worms from British vertebrates. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 11, 473–98.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G. (1952). Sur un Capillaria du vanneau. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 27, 400–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabaud, A. G. (1958). Essai de classification des nématodes Habronematinae. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 23, 445–508.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G., Brygoo, E. R. & Richard, J. (1964). Filaires d'oiseaux malgaches (Deuxième note). Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 39, 69–94.Google Scholar
Chabaud, A. G. & Petter, A. J. (1959). Essai de classification des nematodes Acuariidae. Annls Parasit. hum. comp. 34, 331–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clapham, P. A. (1945). Some bird helminths from Antigua. J. Helminth. 21, 93–9.Google Scholar
Cram, E. B. (1927). Bird parasites of the nematode suborders Strongylata, Ascaridata, and Spirurata. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 140, 1–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cram, E. B. (1933). A new species of Tetrameres from the bobwhite. J. Parasit. 19, 245–6.Google Scholar
Cram, E. B. (1936). Species of Capillaria parasitic in the upper digestive tract of birds. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 516, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. C. H. (1829). Novae observationes de entozois, 134 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
Czaplinski, B. (1962). Nematodes and acanthocephalans of domestic and wild Anseriformes in Poland. 1. Revision of the genus Amidostomum Railliet & Henry, 1909. Acta Parasit. polonica 10, 125–62.Google Scholar
Drasche, A. von (1884). Revision der in der Nematoden-Sammlung des k.k. zoologischen Hof. cabinets befindeschen Original-Exemplare Diesings und Molin's. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 33, 193–218.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des helminthes ou vers intestinaux, 645 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Efimov, A. Z. & Ryzhova, A. A. (1939). [A new nematode of birds, representative of the family genus Tetrameres–Tetrameres araliensis, n.sp.] (In Russian.) Trudy Gorkii Pedag. Inst. 4, 77–81.Google Scholar
Gibson, G. G. (1964). Taxonomic and biological observations on Streptocara californica (Gedoelst, 1919) Gedoelst and Liegeors, 1922 and the genus Streptocara (Nematoda: Acuariidae). Can. J. Zool. 42, 773–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gushanskaya, L. K. (1950). [New spirurata of birds.] (In Russian.) Trudy gel'mint. Lab. 4, 40–52.Google Scholar
Inglis, W. G. (1965). The nematodes parasitic in the gizzard of birds: a study in morphological convergence. J. Helminth. 39, 207–24.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Mawson, P. M. (1941). Additional nematodes from Australian birds. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 65, 254–62.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Mawson, P. M. (1942). Some avian nematodes from Tailem Bend, South Australia. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 66, 71–73.Google Scholar
Li, H. C. (1934). Report on a collection of parasitic nematodes, mainly from North China. Pt. II. Spiruroidea. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 53, 174–95.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. (1962). Filarial parasites (Nematoda: Filarioidea) of Australian animals. Aust. J. Zool. 10, 400–57.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. (1945). The species of Capillaria (Nematodes, Trichinelloidea) parasitic in the digestive tract of Danish gallinaceous and anatine game birds, with a revised list of the species of Capillaria in birds. Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 1, 1–122.Google Scholar
Mawson, P. M. (1959). Some nematode parasites from Australian hosts. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 82, 151–162Google Scholar
Mettrick, D. F. (1959). On the genus Capillaria in British birds. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 13, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molin, R. (1860). Una monographia del genero Spiroptera. Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Abt. 1, 38, 911–1005.Google Scholar
Oshmarin, P. G. (1956). [Tetramerids (Spirurata: Tetrameridae) of domestic and wild birds of the Primorskii Krai.] (In Russian.) Trudy dal'nevost Fil. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 3, 281–384.Google Scholar
Rasheed, S. (1960). The nematode parasites of the birds of Hyderabad (India). Biologia, Lahore 6, 1–116.Google Scholar
Rudolphi, C. A. (1809). Entozoorum sive vermium intestinalium historia naturalis, Vol. 2 part 1, 457 pp. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sanwal, K. C. (1952). On a new avian nematode, Krusadia indica, n.g., n.sp. (Subfam. Schistorophinae Travassos 1918) from the jungle nightjar (Caprimulgus indicus). Indian Helminth. 4, 130–6.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. F. (1866). Monographie der Nematoden. 357 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar
Serkova, O. P. (1948). [Roundworms of birds of Barabin Lakes] (In Russian). Parazit. Sb. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 10, 209–244.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G. (1914). Sur un Tropidocerca parasite d'un chassier. C.r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 16, 778–81.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G. (1916). Sur un nouveau type de Spiruridae. C.r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 79, 517–19.Google Scholar
Seurat, L. G. (1918). Sur un noveau strongyle (Trichostrongylidae) de l'Echasse. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris 24, 113–15.Google Scholar
Singh, S. N. (1948). Studies on the helminth parasites of birds in Hyderabad state (India) Nematoda. 2. J. Helminth. 22, 199–218.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. (1916). Nématodes des oiseaux du Turkestan Russe. Ann. Mus. zool. Acad. imp. Sci. Petrograd (1915), 20, 457–557.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I. & Sobolev, A. A. (1963). [Parasites of Animals and Man, Vol. 11. Spirurata: Spiruroidea.] (In Russian.) 511 pp.Google Scholar
Skrjabin, K. I., Sobolev, A. A. & Ivaskin, V. M. (1965). [Parasites of Animals and Man. Vol. xiv Spirurata: Acuarioidea.] (In Russian). 572 pp.Google Scholar
Solonitsin, I. (1928). [Zur Kenntnis der Helminthfauna der Vogel der Cuwasen–Tataren–Republik. Nematoden und Trematoden der Vogel.] (In Russian.) Uchen.Zap.kazan. gos. Vet. Inst. 83, 75–99.Google Scholar
Wehr, E. E. (1937). Two new species of Echinuria (Nematoda: Acuariinae) from birds, with notes on other species of this genus. Rabot. Gelmint. (Skrjabin), 763–8.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1935). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Pt. 12. Avian nematodes 1. Jap. J. Zool. 6, 403–31.Google Scholar
Zeder, J. C. H. (1800). Erster Nachtrag zur Naturgesichte der Eingeweidewürmer mit Zufässen und Anmerkungen herausgegeben. Leipzig. 320 pp.Google Scholar