Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:16:06.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morphology and Division of Hexamita gigas n.sp. (Flagellata)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop
Ann Bishop
Affiliation:
From The Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A Previous paper (Bishop, 1932) dealt with the cultivation of a Hexamita sp. found in the horse-leech (Haemopis sanguisugae = Aulastomum gulo). The present paper deals with the morphology and method of division of the Hexamita above referred to, which I now name H. gigas n.sp. Dobell (1909) gave a detailed history of the nomenclature of the genus, and Wenyon (1926) has dealt with the same subject and given a list of the then known species and their hosts. Two species have since been described: H. pulcher, by Becker (1926), from the caecum of the ground squirrel Citellus tridecemlineatus, and Octomitus (= Hexamita) pitheci described and figured by da Cunha and Muniz (1928) from the intestine of Macacus rhesus. Apart from the two species (Hexamita nodulosa and H. inflate) described by Dujardin (1841) from stagnant water, and in which he saw but six flagella, a single species only has been described hitherto from a non-vertebrate host. This species, Octomitus (= Hexamita) periplanetae, a small flagellate 5–8 μ in length, from the gut of the cockroach, was described by Bělař (1916); a similar flagellate from the gut of Blatta orientalis has been found by me.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 1933 , pp. 163 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexeieff, A. (1908). Sur la division de Hexamitus intestinalis Dujardin. C.B. Soc. Biol. 65, 402.Google Scholar
Beckbe, E. R. (1926). The flagellate fauna of the caecum of the striped ground squirrel, Citdlus tridecemlineatus, with special reference to Chilomastix magna sp.nov. Biol. Bull. 51, 287.Google Scholar
Bělař, K. (1916). Protozoenstudien II. Arch. Protistenk. 36, 241.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (1932). Entamoeba aulastomi Noller. Cultivation, morphology, and method of division; and cultivation of Hexamita sp. Parasitol. 24, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, A. (1932 a). A note upon Retortamonas rotunda n.sp., an intestinal flagellate in Bufo vulgaris. Parasitol. 24, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Cunha, A. M. and Muniz, J. (1928). Nota sobre os parasitas intestinaes do Macacus rhesus com a descripçaó de uma nova especie de Octomitus. Mem. Inst. O. Cruz, Suppl. 5, 34.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1909). Researches on the intestinal Protozoa of frogs and toads. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 53, 201.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1841). Histoire naturelle des Zoophytes. Infusoires. Paris.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1928). Ergebnisse mit der Nuclealfärbung bei Protozoen. Arch. Protistenk. 61, 144.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. (1927). Notes on certain points in the cytology of Trypanosoma raiae and Bodo caudatus. Parasitol. 19, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swezy, O. (1915). Binary and multiple fission in Hexamitus. Univ. Calif. Pub. Zool. 16, 71.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1907). Observations on the Protozoa in the intestine of mice. Arch. Protistenk. Suppl. 1, 169.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1926). Protozoology. London.Google Scholar