Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:16:35.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The metazoan parasite communities of the Argentinean sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata (Pisces: Perciformes) and their use to elucidate the stock structure of the host

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

J. T. TIMI  and
A. L. LANFRANCHI
J. T. TIMI*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Argentina
A. L. LANFRANCHI
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Argentina
*
*Corresponding author. Tel: +54 223 4752426. Fax: +54 223 4753150. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The use of parasites as biological tags allowed the identification of 3 stocks of Argentinean sandperch, Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier), in the Argentine Sea. A total of 100 specimens caught in 3 zones: Villa Gesell (37°15′S, 57°23′W; n=20), Miramar (38°03′S, 57°30′W–38°44′S, 58°44′W; n=30) and Península Valdes (42°00′–42°45′S; n=50), were examined and 28 parasite species were found, 15 of them being new host records. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified discrete stocks in each zone. The observed differences were not related to the host size or sex. Each locality was characterized by its own indicator species. Villa Gesell was typified by unidentified cestode plerocercoids, Corynosoma cetaceum and Hysterothylacium sp., Miramar by Heterosentis sp. and Pseudoterranova sp. and Península Valdes by A. simplex s.l. Fishes from both northern localities shared gnathiid pranizae, Corynosoma australe and Grillotia sp. as indicators, whereas Miramar and Península Valdes shared only Trifur tortuosus. The most distant localities showed no indicator species in common. Discriminant analyses of parasite assemblages agreed with populational comparisons in identifying the same set of biological tags, whereas some differences in the identity of indicator species were obtained by similarity analysis. However, the 3 approaches were congruent in identifying Grillotia sp., C. australe and C. cetaceum as indicators of northern localities, and A. simplex s.l. as related to Patagonian waters. Differences among zones could be enhanced by the sedentary habits, limited dispersal and high site fidelity of P. semifasciata, and their spawning in rocky outcrops, which are isolated environments.

Keywords

fish populationsbiological tagsSouth West Atlantic
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 136 , Issue 10 , September 2009 , pp. 1209 - 1219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acha, E. M., Mianzán, H. W., Guerrero, R. A., Favero, M. and Bava, J. (2004). Marine fronts at the continental shelves of austral South America physical and ecological process. Journal of Marine Systems 44, 83–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakun, A. and Parrish, R. H. (1991). Comparative studies of coastal pelagic fish reproductive habitats: the anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) of the southwestern Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 48, 343–361. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/48.3.343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogazzi, E., Baldoni, A., Rivas, A., Martos, P., Reta, R., Orensanz, J. M., Lasta, M., Dell'Arciprete, P. and Werner, F. (2005). Spatial correspondence between areas of concentration of Patagonian scallop (Zygochlamys patagonica) and frontal systems in the southwestern Atlantic. Fisheries Oceanography 14, 359–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00340.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braicovich, P. E. and Timi, J. T. (2008). Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination of the Brazilian flathead Percophis brasiliensis in the South West Atlantic. Journal of Fish Biology 73, 557–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01948.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodgar 1.8. (2000). Software Package for Multivariate Analysis and Multivariate Time Series Analysis. Highland Statistics Ltd, Aberdeenshire, UK.Google Scholar
Brunetti, N., Ivanovic, M., Aubone, A. and Rossi, G. (2000). Calamar. In Síntesis del Estado de las Pesquerías Marítimas Argentinas y de la Cuenca del Plata. Años 1997–1998, con una Actualización de 1999 (ed. Bezzi, S., Akselman, R. and Boschi, E.), pp. 104–116. INIDEP, Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Bush, A. O., Aho, J. M. and Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Ecological versus phylogenetic determinants of helminth parasite community richness. Evolutionary Ecology 4, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. and Shostak, A. W. (1997). Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, C. B., Cribb, T. H. and Malcolm, J. K. (2000). Tetraphyllidean metacestodes of teleosts of the Great Barrier Reef, and the use of in vitro cultivation to identify them. Folia Parasitologica 47, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R. and Gorley, R. N. (2006). PRIMER V6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. R. and Warwick, R. M. (2001). Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edn.PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
Cousseau, M. B. and Perrotta, R. G. (2004). Peces marinos de Argentina. Biología, distribución, pesca. Publicaciones especiales INIDEP, Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Cremonte, F. and Sardella, N. (1997). The parasitofauna of Scomber japonicus Houttuyn, 1782 (Pisces: Scombridae) in two zones of the Argentine Sea. Fisheries Research 31, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elías, I. and Burgos, G. (1988). Edad y crecimiento del “salmón de mar,” Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier, 1829) (Osteichthyes, Pinguipedidae) en aguas norpatagónicas argentinas. Investigaciones Pesqueras 5, 533–548.Google Scholar
Elías, I. and Rajoy, C. R. (1992). Hábitos alimentarios del “salmón de mar” Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier, 1829): Pinguipedidae en aguas norpatagónicas argentinas. Revista de Biología Marina 27, 133–146.Google Scholar
Etchegoin, J. A., Lanfranchi, A. L. and Timi, J. T. (2009). The mesoparasitic copepod Trifur tortuosus Wilson, 1917 (Pennellidae): Redescription with notes on its congeners. Acta Parasitologica 54, 57–63. doi: 10.2478/s11686-009-0002-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, R. A. C. (1998). Biología y explotación pesquera del salmón de mar Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier, 1829) (Pinguipedidae) en el Golfo San Matías, Patagonia, Argentina. Ph.D. thesis., Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
González, R. A. C. (2006). Age and growth of the Argentine Sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata (Cuvier, 1829) Berg, 1899 in the San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Fisheries Research 79, 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, R. A. and Tanzola, R. D. (2000). On the presence of Sarcotaces verrucosus (Copepoda) in the Southwest Atlantic. Acta Parasitologica 45, 345–349.Google Scholar
Guégan, J.-F., Lambert, A., Lévêque, C., Combes, C. and Euzet, L. (1992). Can host body size explain the parasite species richness in tropical freshwater fishes? Oecologia 90, 197–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00317176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerrero, R. A. and Piola, A. R. (1997). Masas de agua en la plataforma continental. In El Mar Argentino y sus Recursos Pesqueros. Antecedentes Históricos de las Exploraciones en el Mar y las Características Ambientales, Vol. 1 (ed. Boschi, E.), pp. 107–118. INIDEP, Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Guerrero, R. A., Acha, E. M., Framinan, M. B. and Lasta, C. A. (1997). Physical oceanography of the Río de la Plata Estuary, Argentina. Continental Shelf Research 17, 727–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimpel, S. and Rükert, S. (2005). Life cycle strategy of Hysterothylacium aduncum to become the most abundant anisakid fish nematode in the North Sea. Parasitology Research 97, 141–149. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-1407-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luque, J. L., Felizardo, N. N. and Tavares, L. E. R. (2008). Community ecology of the metazoan parasites of namorado sandperches, Pseudopercis numida Miranda-Ribeiro, 1903 and P. semifasciata Cuvier, 1829 (Perciformes: Puinguipedidae), from the coastal zone of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 68, 269–278. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842008000200007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macchi, G. J., Elías, I. and Burgos, G. E. (1995). Histological observations on the reproductive cycle of the Argentinean sandperch, Pseudopercis semifasciata (Osteichthyes, Pinguipedidae). Scientia Marina 59, 119–127.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K. (2002). Parasites as biological tags in population studies of marine organisms: an update. Parasitology 124 (Suppl.), S153–S163. doi: 10.1017/S0031182002001518CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, K. and Abaunza, P. (1998). Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination of marine fish: a guide to procedures and methods. Fisheries Research 38, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martos, P. (1989). Synopsis on the reproductive biology and early life history of Engraulis anchoita, and related environmental conditions in Argentine waters. The physical environment. In Second IOC Workshop on Sardine/Anchovy Recruitment Project (SARP) in the Southwest Atlantic. Montevideo, Uruguay, 21–23 August 1989. Workshop Report N°. 65, Annex V, pp. 1–2. Montivideo: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission/UNESCO.Google Scholar
Pietrock, M. and Marcogliese, D. J. (2003). Free-living endohelminth stages: at the mercy of environmental conditions. Trends in Parasitology 19, 293–299. doi:10.1016/S1471-4922(03)00117-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piola, A. R. and Rivas, A. L. (1997). Masas de agua en la plataforma continental. In El Mar Argentino y sus Recursos Pesqueros. Antecedentes Históricos de las Exploraciones en el Mar y las Características Ambientales, Vol. 1 (ed. Boschi, E.), pp. 119–132. INIDEP. Mar del Plata, Argentina.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2000). Variation in the intraspecific relationship between fish length and intensity of parasitic infection: biological and statistical causes. Journal of Fish Biology 56, 123–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02090.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. and Clancy, K. M. (1983). Patterns in number of helminth parasite species in freshwater fishes. Journal of Parasitology 69, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, I. L. and Rosa, R. S. (1997). Systematic revision of the South American species of Pinguipedidae (Teleostei, Trachinoidei). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14, 845–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, M. E. and Martos, P. (2002). Mesozooplankton features in a frontal area off northern Patagonia (Argentina) during spring 1995 and 1998. Scientia Marina 66, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardella, N. H. and Timi, J. T. (2004). Parasites of Argentine hake in the Argentine Sea: population and infracommunity structure as evidences for host stock discrimination. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 1472–1488. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00572.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T. (2003). Parasites of Argentine anchovy in the Southwest Atlantic: latitudinal patterns and their use for discrimination of host populations. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 90–107. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00131.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T. (2007). Parasites as biological tags for stock discrimination in marine fish from South American Atlantic waters. Journal of Helminthology 81, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timi, J. T. and Lanfranchi, A. L. (2009). The importance of the compound community on the parasite infracommunity structure in a small benthic fish. Parasitology Research 104, 295–302. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1191-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T. and Poulin, R. (2003). Parasite community structure within and across host populations of a marine Pelagic fish: how repeatable is it? International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1353–1362. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00203-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T., Luque, J. L. and Sardella, N. H. (2005). Parasites of Cynoscion guatucupa along South American Atlantic coasts: evidence for stock discrimination. Journal of Fish Biology 67, 1603–1618. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00867.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T., Lanfranchi, A. L., Etchegoin, J. A. and Cremonte, F. (2008). Parasites of the Brazilian sandperch Pinguipes brasilianus: a tool for stock discrimination in the Argentine Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 72, 1332–1342. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01800.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timi, J. T., Lanfranchi, A. L. and Etchegoin, J. A. (2009). Seasonal stability and spatial variability of parasites in Brazilian sandperch from the northern Argentine sea: evidence for stock discrimination. Journal of Fish Biology 74, 1206–1225. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02190.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venerus, L. A., Machinandiarena, L., Ehrlich, M. D. and Parma, A. M. (2005). Early life history of the Argentine sandperch Pseudopercis semifasciata (Pinguipedidae) off northern Patagonia. Fisheries Bulletin 103, 195–206.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Edn.Prentice-Hall. Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NY, USA.Google Scholar