Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:30:59.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Malaria Survey in the Malay Archipelago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

N. H. Swellengrebel  and
J. M. H. Swellengrebel-de Graaf
N. H. Swellengrebel
Affiliation:
(From the Institute of Tropical Hygiene, Amsterdam.)
J. M. H. Swellengrebel-de Graaf
Affiliation:
(From the Institute of Tropical Hygiene, Amsterdam.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The great discovery of Sir Ronald Ross has not led to the suppression of malaria in the Netherlands' East Indian Colonies, where the disease is still all too prevalent. The failure is partly, if not wholly, due to the mistake that has been made in considering the facts revealed by this discovery as an all sufficient basis for practical sanitary measures, whereas they can only serve as a foundation for further research in which special and local conditions are taken into account, with the object of acquiring information which is essential for the success of a sanitary campaign.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1920 , pp. 180 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, (1918). Some observations and experiments on the Malayan Anopheles, with special reference to the transmission of malaria. Philip. Journ. of Sci. Sect. B xiii. 1.Google Scholar
Breemen Van, (1918). De verbreiding van de malaria in Weltevreden en Batavia. Geneesk tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, lviii. 623.Google Scholar
Breemen Van, (1919). Verdere gegevens betreffende het malaria vraagstuk te Weltevreden en Batavia. Geneesk tijdschr. v. ned. Indië lix. 311.Google Scholar
Citroen, (1917). Anophelinensoorten te Soerabaia. Geneesk tijdschr. v. ned. Indië lvii. 763.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, (1906). Über die Verbreitung der Anopheles auf Formosa und deren Beziehung zu den Malaria Krankheiten. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropenhygiene, x. 621, 676, 708, 741.Google Scholar
Roper, (1914). An account of some Anopheline mosquitoes found in British North Borneo. Butt. Entomol. Research, v. 137.Google Scholar
Schüffner, (1902). Die Beziehung der Malariaparasiten zu Mensch und Mücke an der Ostküste Sumatras. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infektionskr. xli. 89.Google Scholar
Schüffner, and Swellengrebel, (1914). De Anophelinen in Deli in verband met de uitbreiding der malaria. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, liv. 140.Google Scholar
Schüffner, and Van der Heyden, (1917). De Anophelinen in nederlandsch Indië. Meded. v. d. Burg. Geneesk. Dienst, No. 4, 1.Google Scholar
Schüffner, , Swellengrebel, , Swellengrebel-de Graaf and Mochtar, (1919). Over de biologie van M. ludlowi in Sumatra. Meded. v. d. Burg. Geneesk. Dienst No. 3, 65.Google Scholar
Schüffner, (1919 a). Twee onderwerpen uit de malaria epidemiologie. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, lix. 219.Google Scholar
Stanton, (1914). Anopheles and Malaria in the Oriental Region. Congress Far-East Assoc. Trop. Med. in Saigon, November 1913, 514.Google Scholar
Strickland, (1916). Considerations regarding an outbreak of malaria at Morib (F.M.S.). Parasitology, viii. 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1914). Myzorhynchus argyropus n. sp. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, liv.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1916). De Anophelinen van nederlandsch Indië. Meded. v. h. koloniaal Instituut te Amsterdam, No. vii. 182 pp.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1917). Myzomyia flava n. sp. een nieuwe Anopheline voor ned. Indië. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, lvii. 807.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1918 a). De infeetabiliteit van eenige nederlandsch-indisehe Anophelinen. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië lviii. xxxv.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1918 b). Beschrijving van drie nog niet of onvoldoende bekende larven van nederlandsch-indisehe Anophelinen. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië lviii. 398.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, (1919). Eenige voor ned. Indië nieuwe Anophelinen. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië lix. 1.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, Schüffner, and Swellengbebel-de Graaf, (1919). De ontvankelijkheid der Anophelinen voor malaria-infecties in nederlandsch Indië. Meded. Burg. Geneesk. Dienst, No. 3, 1.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, Schüffner, and Swellengbebel-de Graaf, (1919 a). Over de eischen die verschillende Anophelinen stellen aan de woon plaatsen hunner larven. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, lix. 267.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, Schüffner, and Swellengbebel-de Graaf, (1919 b). Beschrijving van de larven der ned.-indische Anophelinen voor zoover tot nu tot bekend. Meded. Burg. Geneesk. Dienst, No. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Vogel de, (1909). Myzomyia rossii als de overbrengster der malaria. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, xlix. 585.Google Scholar
Walker, and Barber, (1914). Malaria in the Philippine Islands. Philip. Journ. of Sci. Sect. B ix. 381.Google Scholar
Watson, (1911). The prevention of malaria in the Federated Malay States. Publ. by the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 139 pp.Google Scholar
Watson, (1915). Rural Sanitation in the Tropics. LondonMurray.Google Scholar
Winoto, (1918). Anophelinen van West-Java. Geneesk. tijdschr. v. ned. Indië, lviii. 462.Google Scholar