Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:06:33.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The laboratory maintenance of Sanguinicola inermis Plehn, 1905 (Digenea: Sanguinicolidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. S. Kirk  and
J. W. Lewis
R. S. Kirk
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 OEX
J. W. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 OEX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Methodology is described for the laboratory maintenance of the life-cycle of Sanguinicola inermis, using common carp (Cyprinus carpio) as the definitive host and Lymnaea peregra as the intermediate host. Lymnaea auricularia was also infected but is not considered to be a suitable laboratory host. Tench (Tinca tinca) were susceptible to infection at high cercarial doses but subsequent infection rates were low. Goldfish (Carassius auratus) and Lymnaea stagnalis were refractory to laboratory infection.

Keywords

Sanguinicola inermisDigenealaboratory maintenanceCyprinus carpioLymnaea peregra
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chernogorenko, M. I. (1980). Sezonnaya dinamika zarazhennosti mollyuskov lichinkami i partenitami trematod v vodokhranilishchakh dnepra. Vestnik Zoologii (USSR) 0 (5), 53–6.Google Scholar
Ejsmont, DE M. L. (1926). Morphologische, systematische und entwickelungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Arten des Genus Sanguinicola Plehn. Bulletin Internal de l'académie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles 9–10B, 877–966.Google Scholar
Gladunko, I. I. (1968). Osobennosti morfologii i biologii nekotorykh predstavitelei poda Sanguinicola Plehn, 1905. Mater nauch konf vses Obshch Gel'mint No. 2, 81–7.Google Scholar
Iqbal, N. A. M. (1984). Studies on Sanguinicola inermis Plehn, 1905 from cultured carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in Britain. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
Lee, R. S. (1990). The development of Sanguinicola inermis Plehn, 1905 (Digenea: Sanguinicolidae) in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Macinnis, A. J. (1965). Responses of Schistosoma mansoni miracidia to chemical attractants. Journal of Parasitology 51, 731–46.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G. W., Holmes, J. C., Kuris, A. M. & Schad, G. A. (1982). The use of ecological terms in parasitology. (Report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists). Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, K. (1969). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fischparasitenfauna Ungarns. IV. Trematoden. Parasitologia Hungarica 2, 119–35.Google Scholar
Naumova, A. M. (1961 a). O razvitii kroveparazita karpa Sanguinicola inermis. Doklady moskovskaya sel'skokhozyaist Vennaya Akademiya imenika Timiryazeva, No. 65, 273–9.Google Scholar
Naumova, A. M. (1961 b). Zarazhenie karpov sangvinikoloi inermis v zavisimosti ot sezonagoda. Doklady moskovskaya sel'skokhozyaist Vennaya Akademiya imenika Timiryazeva No. 69, 211–16.Google Scholar
Rau, M. E., Bourns, T. K. R. & Ellis, J. C. (1972). An improved method for collecting schistosome miracidia. International Journal for Parasitology 2, 279–80.Google Scholar
Schell, S. C. (1974). The life history of Sanguinicola idahoensis sp. n. (Trematoda: Sanguinicolidae); a blood parasite of steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Journal of Parasitology 60, 561–6.Google Scholar
Scheuring, L. (1922). Der Lebenscyklus von Sanguinicola inermis Plehn. Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 44, 265–310.Google Scholar
Standen, O. D. (1951). Some observations upon the maintenance of Australorbis glabratus in the laboratory. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 45, 80–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strelkov, YU. A. (1971). Digeneticheskie sosalshchiki ryb Basseina Amura. In Parazitologicheskii Sbornik XXV. Parasity Ryb Amura (ed. Pavlovskim, E. N.), pp. 120–39. Leningrad: Izdatelvstvo Nauka Leningradskoe Otdelenie.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. (1959). The application of paper chromatography to a taxonomic study in the molluscan genus Lymnaea. Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology) 44, 222–37.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Edn.New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int., Inc.Google Scholar