Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:13:13.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions with ectoparasitic mites induce host metabolic and immune responses in flies at the expense of reproduction-associated factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Joshua B. Benoit Open the ORCID record for Joshua B. Benoit [Opens in a new window] ,
Joy Bose ,
Samuel T. Bailey  and
Michal Polak
Joshua B. Benoit*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Joy Bose
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Samuel T. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Michal Polak
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Joshua B. Benoit, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parasites cause harm to their hosts and represent pervasive causal agents of natural selection. Understanding host proximate responses during interactions with parasites can help predict which genes and molecular pathways are targets of this selection. In the current study, we examined transcriptional changes arising from interactions between Drosophila melanogaster and their naturally occurring ectoparasitic mite, Gamasodes queenslandicus. Shifts in host transcript levels associated with behavioural avoidance revealed the involvement of genes underlying nutrient metabolism. These genetic responses were reflected in altered body lipid and glycogen levels in the flies. Mite infestation triggered a striking immune response, while male accessory gland protein transcript levels were simultaneously reduced, suggesting a trade-off between host immune responses to parasite challenge and reproduction. Comparison of transcriptional analyses during mite infestation to those during nematode and parasitoid attack identified host genes similarly expressed in flies during these interactions. Validation of the involvement of specific genes with RNA interference lines revealed candidates that may directly mediate fly–ectoparasite interactions. Our physiological and molecular characterization of the Drosophila–Gamasodes interface reveals new proximate mechanisms underlying host–parasite interactions, specifically host transcriptional shifts associated with behavioural avoidance and infestation. The results identify potential general mechanisms underlying host resistance and evolutionarily relevant trade-offs.

Keywords

DrosophilaectoparasiteGamasodesmitesnutrient levelsparasite resistanceRNA-seqtrade-offs
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 147 , Issue 11 , September 2020 , pp. 1196 - 1205
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolger, M, Lohse, M and Usadel, B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brix, K, Dunkhorst, A, Mayer, K and Jordans, S (2008) Cysteine cathepsins: cellular roadmap to different functions. Biochimie 90, 194–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JKM and Tellier, A (2011) Plant–parasite coevolution: bridging the gap between genetics and ecology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 49, 345–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JB, Boley, N, Eisman, R, May, GE, Stoiber, MH, Duff, MO, Booth, BW, Wen, J, Park, S, Suzuki, AM, Wan, KH, Yu, C, Zhang, D, Carlson, JW, Cherbas, L, Eads, BD, Miller, D, Mockaitis, K, Roberts, J, Davis, CA, Frise, E, Hammonds, AS, Olson, S, Shenker, S, Sturgill, D, Samsonova, AA, Weiszmann, R, Robinson, G, Hernandez, J, Andrews, J, Bickel, PJ, Carninci, P, Cherbas, P, Gingeras, TR, Hoskins, RA, Kaufman, TC, Lai, EC, Oliver, B, Perrimon, N, Graveley, BR and Celniker, SE (2014) Diversity and dynamics of the Drosophila transcriptome. Nature 512, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzatto, BA, Kotiaho, JS, Assis, LAF and Simmons, LW (2019) A link between heritable parasite resistance and mate choice in dung beetles. Behavioral Ecology 30, 1382–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, JC, Creasy, T, Kumari, P, Shetty, A, Shokal, U, Tallon, LJ and Eleftherianos, I (2015) Drosophila anti-nematode and antibacterial immune regulators revealed by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics 16, 519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Champion de Crespigny, FEC and Wedell, N (2006) Wolbachia infection reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, 1455–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, YN, Tan, KJ, Chung, H, Lavrynenko, O, Shevchenko, A and Yew, JY (2016) Steroid hormone signaling is essential for pheromone production and oenocyte survival. PLoS Genetics 12, e1006126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combes, C (2001) Parasitism: The Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cortright, BA (2012) Variation Among Single-Gene Mutant Lines and Fitness Effects of Ectoparasitism in Drosophila melanogaster (Master's thesis). University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Duffield, KR, Bowers, EK, Sakaluk, SK and Sadd, BM (2017) A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71, 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkin, ES and Luong, LT (2019) Phenotypic plasticity more essential to maintaining variation in host-attachment behaviour than evolutionary trade-offs in a facultatively parasitic mite. Parasitology 146, 1289–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekengren, S and Hultmark, D (2001) A family of turandot-related genes in the humoral stress response of Drosophila. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 284, 998–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekengren, S, Tryselius, Y, Dushay, MS, Liu, G, Steiner, H and Hultmark, D (2001) A humoral stress response in Drosophila. Current Biology 11, 1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewald, PW (1995) The evolution of virulence: a unifying link between parasitology and ecology. The Journal of Parasitology 81, 659–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitze, PS, Tschirren, B and Richner, H (2004) Life history and fitness consequences of ectoparasites. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, RS and Simms, EL (1992) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, A (2010) Heritable Behavioral Resistance to Natural and Novel Ectoparasites in Drosophila melanogaster (Master's thesis). University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Hagan, RW, Didion, EM, Rosselot, AE, Holmes, CJ, Siler, SC, Rosendale, AJ, Hendershot, JM, Elliot, KSB, Jennings, EC, Nine, GA, Perez, PL, Rizlallah, AE, Watanabe, M, Romick-Rosendale, LE, Xiao, Y, Rasgon, JL and Benoit, JB (2018) Dehydration prompts increased activity and blood feeding by mosquitoes. Scientific Reports 8, 6804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, RB, Walter, DE and Polak, M (2005) A new species of Gamasodes oudemans from Australia (Acari: Parasitidae). Zootaxa 1001, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, JF and Roberts, SP (2000) Flight respiration and energetics. Annual Review of Physiology 62, 179–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henter, HJ and Via, S (1995) The potential for coevolution in a host–parasitoid system. I. Genetic variation within an aphid population in susceptibility to a parasitic wasp. Evolution 49, 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenike, J, Polak, M, Fiskin, A, Helou, M and Minhas, M (2007) Interspecific transmission of endosymbiotic Spiroplasma by mites. Biology Letters 3, 23–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, A (2007) Drosophila melanogaster's history as a human commensal. Current Biology 17, R77–R81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFlamme, BA and Wolfner, MF (2013) Identification and function of proteolysis regulators in seminal fluid. Molecular Reproduction and Development 80, 80–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leader, DP, Krause, SA, Pandit, A, Davies, SA and Dow, JAT (2018) Flyatlas 2: a new version of the Drosophila melanogaster expression atlas with RNA-Seq, miRNA-Seq and sex-specific data. Nucleic Acids Research 46, D809–D815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luong, LT and Polak, M (2007) Costs of resistance in the Drosophila–Macrocheles system: a negative genetic correlation between ectoparasite resistance and reproduction. Evolution 61, 1391–1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luong, LT, Horn, CJ and Brophy, T (2017) Mitey costly: energetic costs of parasite avoidance and infection. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 90, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, ZR, Schlenke, TA and de Roode, JC (2016) Evolution of behavioural and cellular defences against parasitoid wasps in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 29, 1016–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao-Yuan, Y, Yi, T-C, Guo, J-J, Polak, M and Jin, DC (2020) A new species and new record species of Gamasodes (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) from China, with a key to species known in China. Systematic and Applied Acarology, In press.Google Scholar
Marino, JA (2016) Interspecific variation in larval anuran anti-parasite behavior: a test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology 30, 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazé-Guilmo, E, Loot, G, Páez, DJ, Lefèvre, T and Blanchet, S (2014) Heritable variation in host tolerance and resistance inferred from a wild host–parasite system. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281, 20132567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mierzejewski, MK, Horn, CJ and Luong, LT (2019) Ecology of fear: environment-dependent parasite avoidance among ovipositing. Parasitology 146, 1564–1570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell-Olds, T and Bradley, D (1996) Genetics of Brassica rapa. 3. Cost of disease resistance to three fungal pathogens. Evolution 50, 1859–1865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montooth, KL, Marden, JH and Clark, AG (2003) Mapping determinants of variation in energy metabolism, respiration and flight in Drosophila. Genetics 165, 623–635.Google ScholarPubMed
Niwa, R and Niwa, YS (2014) Enzymes for ecdysteroid biosynthesis: their biological functions in insects and beyond. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 78, 1283–1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Leanos, A, Loustalot-Laclette, MR, Nazario-Yepiz, N and Markow, TA (2017) Ectoparasitic mites and their Drosophila hosts. Fly 11, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, LA, Holderbaum, L, Tao, R, Hu, Y, Sopko, R, McCall, K, Yang-Zhou, D, Flockhart, I, Binari, R, Shim, H-S, Miller, A, Housden, A, Foos, M, Randkelv, S, Kelley, C, Namgyal, P, Villalta, C, Liu, L-P, Jiang, X, Huan-Huan, Q, Wang, X, Fujiyama, A, Toyoda, A, Ayers, K, Blum, A, Czech, B, Neumuller, R, Yan, D, Cavallaro, A, Hibbard, K, Hall, D, Cooley, L, Hannon, GJ, Lehmann, R, Parks, A, Mohr, SE, Ueda, R, Kondo, S, Ni, J-Q and Perrimon, N (2015) The transgenic RNAi project at Harvard Medical School: resources and validation. Genetics 201(3), 843–852. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.180208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polak, M (1996) Ectoparasitic effects on host survival and reproduction: the Drosophila–Macrocheles association. Ecology 77, 1379–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polak, M (1998) Effects of ectoparasitism on host condition in the Drosophila–Macrocheles system. Ecology 79, 1807.Google Scholar
Polak, M (2003) Heritability of resistance against ectoparasitism in the Drosophila–Macrocheles system. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polak, M and Markow, TA (1995) Effect of ectoparasitic mites on sexual selection in a sonoran desert fly. Evolution 49, 660–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polak, M and Starmer, WT (1998) Parasite-induced risk of mortality elevates reproductive effort in male Drosophila. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 265, 2197–2201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polak, M, Simmons, LW, Benoit, JB, Ruohonen, K, Simpson, SJ and Solon-Biet, SM (2017) Nutritional geometry of paternal effects on embryo mortality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, 20171492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Radhakrishnan, P and Fedorka, KM (2012) Immune activation decreases sperm viability in both sexes and influences female sperm storage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 3577–3583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raudvere, U, Kolberg, L, Kuzmin, I, Arak, T, Adler, P, Peterson, H and Vilo, J (2019) g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Research 47, W191–W198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, MD (2001) Co-evolution and plant resistance to natural enemies. Nature 411, 857–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, MD, McCarthy, DJ and Smyth, GK (2010) Edger: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roff, DA (2011) Genomic insights into life history evolution. In Flatt, T and Heyland, A (eds), Mechanisms of Life History Evolution. Oxford University Press, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendale, AJ, Dunlevy, ME, McCue, MD and Benoit, JB (2019) Progressive behavioural, physiological and transcriptomic shifts over the course of prolonged starvation in ticks. Molecular Ecology 28, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salazar-Jaramillo, L, Jalvingh, KM, de Haan, A, Kraaijeveld, K, Buermans, H and Wertheim, B (2017) Inter- and intra-species variation in genome-wide gene expression of Drosophila in response to parasitoid wasp attack. BMC Genomics 18, 331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlenke, TA, Morales, J, Govind, S and Clark, AG (2007) Contrasting infection strategies in generalist and specialist wasp parasitoids of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathogens 3, 1486–1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, ME and Dobson, A (1989) The role of parasites in regulating host abundance. Parasitology Today 5, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorci, G, Møller, AP and Boulinier, T (1997) Genetics of host–parasite interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12, 196–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supek, F, Bošnjak, M, Škunca, N and Šmuc, T (2011) REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One 6, e21800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurmond, J, Goodman, JL, Strelets, VB, Attrill, H, Gramates, LS, Marygold, SJ, Matthews, BB, Millburn, G, Antonazzo, G, Trovisco, V and Kaufman, TC and Calvi BR and the FlyBase Consortium (2019) Flybase 2.0: the next generation. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D759–D765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D (1978) Genetic control of susceptibility and resistance to parasitic infection. Advances in Parasitology 16, 219–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, DE and Proctor, HC (2013) Mites: Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour. Life at a Microscale, 2nd Edn.Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheat, CW and Hill, J (2014) Pgi: the ongoing saga of a candidate gene. Current Opinion in Insect Science 4, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windsor, DA (1998) Controversies in parasitology, most of the species on Earth are parasites. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 1939–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingett, SW and Andrews, S (2018) Fastq Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000 Research 7, 1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfner, MF (2002) The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, D and Koganezawa, M (2013) Genes and circuits of courtship behaviour in Drosophila males. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14, 381–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, B and Horvath, S (2005) A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, W, McClure, CD, Evans, CR, Mlynski, DT, Immonen, E, Ritchie, MG and Priest, NK (2013) Immune anticipation of mating in Drosophila: Turandot M promotes immunity against sexually transmitted fungal infections. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280, 20132018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials 1

Download Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 23.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials 2

Download Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 258.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials 3

Download Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 354.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials

Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials 4

Download Benoit et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 11.8 KB