Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:45:56.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro feeding of Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles): effects of histamine and other mediators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. H. Paine
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N 0W0, Canada
D. H. Kemp
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N 0W0, Canada
J. R. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N 0W0, Canada

Summary

Female Dermacentor andersoni were induced to feed on defibrinated bovine blood through fixed mouse skin membranes. Their feeding behaviour was recorded electronically, the tick being incorporated into the circuit and acting as a variable resistor during the periods of sucking, salivation and rest. Recordings of the feeding behaviour of these ticks were similar to those of ticks feeding on rabbits. Known concentrations of histamine, serotonin, dopamine, prostaglandin E1 and prostaglandin F were added singly or in combination to the feeding medium of ticks attached to the mouse skin membrane. Addition of both histamine and serotonin was followed by a significant reduction in the amplitude or recordings associated with sucking and salivation. The concentration of mediators producing this effect was less than 10 mM, a concentration comparable to that of histamine found locally in the skin of tick-resistant guinea-pigs. Comparisons are made between the effects produced by these mediators in ticks and the effects of serotonin and other amines known to produce modulation of complex behaviour patterns in other invertebrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. R. (1973). Tick resistance: basophils in skin reactions of resistant guinea pigs. International Journal for Parasitology 3, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Askenase, P. W., Bagnall, B. G. & Worms, M. J. (1982). Cutaneous basophil-associated resistance to ectoparasites(ticks). I. Transfer with immune serum or immune cells. Immunology 45, 501–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Bagnall, B. G. (1975). Cutaneous immunity to the tick Ixodes holocyclus. Ph.D. thesis. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Berry, M. S. & Pentreath, V. W. (1976). Properties of a symmetric pair of serotonin-containing neurones in the cerebral ganglia of Planorbis. Journal of Experimental Biology 65, 361–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galli, S. J. & Dvorak, H. F. (1979). Cellular, Molecular and Clinical Aspects of Allergic Disorders (ed. Gupta, S. & Good, R. A.), pp. 148. New York.: Plenum Medical Book Company.Google Scholar
Gregson, J. D. (1967). Electrical observations of tick feeding in relation to disease transmission. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Acarology, pp. 329–39.Google Scholar
Gregson, J. D. (1973). Tick paralysis: an appraisal of natural and experimental data. Canada Department of Agriculture Monograph no. 9.Google Scholar
Kemp, D. H. & Bourne, A. (1980). Boophilus microplus: The effect of histamine on the attachment of cattle-tick larvae – studies in vivo and in vitro. Parasitology 80, 487–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koudstaal, D., Kemp, D. H. & Kerr, J. D. (1978). Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle. Parasitology 76, 379–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livingstone, M. S., Harris-Warrick, R. M. & Kravitz, E. A. (1980). Serotonin and octopamine produce opposite postures in lobsters. Science 208, 76–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, C. D., Lyman, M., Alberto, R. & Cheng, J. (1970). Procedures for immunochemical study of histamine release from leucocytes with small volume of blood. Journal of Allergy 46, 1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. A. (1968). Acquisition by the host of resistance to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Journal of Parasitology 54, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleger, A. V., Lincoln, D. T., McKenna, R. V., Kemp, D. H. & Roberts, J. A. (1976). Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachments and their relationship to host resistance. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 29, 499512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweatman, G. K., Tomey, G. & Katul, G. (1976). A technique for the continuous recording of tick feeding electrograms and temperature by telemetry from free-ranging cattle. International Journal for Parasitology 6, 299305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J., Carnell, R. & Kemp, D. H. (1972). Electrical studies on the feeding of cattle-tick, Boophilus microplus. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 38, 3244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trager, W. (1939). Acquired immunity to ticks. Journal of Parasitology 25, 5781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagland, B. M. (1975). Host resistance to the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Brahman (Bosindicus) cattle. I. Responses of previously unexposed cattle to four infestations with 20000 larvae. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 1073–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waladde, S. M., Kemp, D. H. & Rice, M. J. (1979). Feeding electrograms and fluid uptake measurements of cattle tick Boophilus microplus attached on artificial membranes. International Journal for Parasitology 9, 8995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, K. R., Cohen, J. L. & Kuppermann, I. (1978). Modulatory control of buccal musculature by a serotonergic neuron (metacerebral cell) in Aplysia. Journal of Neurophysiology 41, 181203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissbach, H., Waalkes, T. P. & Udenfriend, S. (1958). A simplified method for measuring serotonin in tissues: simultaneous assay of both serotonin and histamine. Journal of Biological Chemistry 230, 865, 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikel, S. K. (1983). Histamine content of tick attachment sites and the effects of H1 and H2 antagonists on the expression of resistance. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology.Google Scholar
Wikel, S. K. & Allen, J. R. (1976 a). Acquired resistance to ticks. II. Effects of cyclophosphamide on resistance. Immunology 30, 479–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Wikel, S. K. & Allen, J. R. (1976 b). Acquired resistance to ticks. I. Passive transfer of resistance. Immunology 30, 311–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Willadsen, P. (1980). Immunity to ticks. Advances in Parasitology 18, 293314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willadsen, P., Williams, P. G., Roberts, J. A. & Kerr, J. D. (1978). Responses of cattle to allergens from Boophilus microplus. International Journal for Parasitology 8, 8995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willadsen, P., Wood, G. M. & Riding, G. A. (1979). The relation between skin histamine concentration, histamine sensitivity and the resistance of cattle to the tick Boophilus microplus. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 59, 8793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar